A Recent Favorite:

Uh Oh, Nothing Here Yet

Why don't you go browse some Comics or Editorials and pick a few to favorite?

Recent Comments

  1. dmishkin GoComics Pro Member commented on Gary Varvel 3 months ago

    Oops, I see the address I pasted in wasn’t automatically converted to a hyperlink. Here’s a shorter URL if anyone wants to read the article: http://tinyurl.com/k35ymg7

  2. dmishkin GoComics Pro Member commented on Gary Varvel 3 months ago

    Re activist conservative judges overreaching to achieve the political result they wanted, see http://www.newrepublic.com/article/118803/halbig-v-burwell-ruling-anti-obamacare-lawsuit-could-backfire-gop

  3. dmishkin GoComics Pro Member commented on Gary Varvel 3 months ago

    Haha. It’s so funny when a political cartoon makes the opposite point of the one the cartoonist thinks he’s making. Too bad there wasn’t room for the balloon where the judge says, “Yes, he did, but we activist conservative judges have deliberately misconstrued the health care law to keep affordable insurance out of the hands of millions.”

  4. dmishkin GoComics Pro Member commented on Ken Catalino 12 months ago

    Separate from anyone’s personal politics, isn’t it a little odd to be using this quote on Veteran’s Day? Jefferson was talking about domestic tyrants, after all, and I don’t recall that our current veterans had to face any of those.

    There’s also Catalino’s unfortunate misstatement of the quotation, which loses the stirring cadence of Jefferson’s actual words: The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.

    In any case, props to those who served.

  5. dmishkin GoComics Pro Member commented on Chip Bok about 1 year ago

    I don’t think a Republican-imposed requirement that members of Congress and their staff must now get their insurance on the exchanges — treating them unlike any other Americans who already have insurance through their employers and stripping them of their existing benefits — counts as “exempting.”

    They would have been treated like everyone else if not for the GOP’s political grandstanding. Nor would a special provision have been required to maintain the federal government’s employer contribution at the same level it was previously.

    http://tinyurl.com/mp3span

  6. dmishkin GoComics Pro Member commented on The Duplex almost 2 years ago

    And here we all thought it was some kind of Christmas miracle (or else a disturbing fixation you were going to need to seek professional help for). Thanks for the explanation.

  7. dmishkin GoComics Pro Member commented on Candorville almost 2 years ago

    Props to Darrin Bell for placing “gobbledygook” in 1944, the year the term was first used. I looked it up because I thought it was a postwar coinage.

    (From Wikipedia: According to Michael Quinion on his World Wide Words website the word was first coined on 21 May 1944 by Maury Maverick, a congressman from Texas. His comments, recorded in the New York Times Magazine, were made when Maverick was the Democratic chairman of the US Congress Smaller War Plants Committee. He was being critical of the obscure language used by other committee members. The allusion was to a turkey, “always gobbledy gobbling and strutting with ludicrous pomposity”. It is sometimes abbreviated slightly to gobbledygoo.)

  8. dmishkin GoComics Pro Member commented on Tom the Dancing Bug over 2 years ago

    Sorry, that’s http://heroinitiative.org.

  9. dmishkin GoComics Pro Member commented on Tom the Dancing Bug over 2 years ago

    If you loved the Avengers movie, but also care about the treatment of comic book creators, go to http://www.heroinitative.org and consider making a contribution.

  10. dmishkin GoComics Pro Member commented on Zack Hill almost 3 years ago

    Now that Vince has been identified, helping us to see that what panel 3 contains is a recommendation for Zack to tell his teacher that some of his best friends are gay (but doesn’t help us see anything funny in the panel 4 punchline), let’s return to the overlooked second panel, and its reference to “those among us with identity issues.”

    I’m not going to try figure out what that phrase is supposed to mean exactly, but the message is clear: poor Zack is struggling with the impossible task of tiptoeing around other people’s incomprehensible “issues.” No, Zack (and John and John): saying “That’s so gay” to describe something you think is bad means that you’re saying “gay” equals “bad.” Maybe I’ll start saying “That’s so Presbyterian” about anything I don’t like, and if any Presbyterians get upset I’ll just throw up my hands about how hard it is to please those among us with religious identity issues.