Enjoy GoComics?

A Recent Favorite:

Uh Oh, Nothing Here Yet

Why don't you go browse some Comics or Editorials and pick a few to favorite?

Recent Comments

  1. Anarcissie commented on Ted Rall 2 days ago

    The far Left and the far Right are the only political categories not involved in the present election disaster.

  2. Anarcissie commented on Lay Lines 13 days ago

    This is funny. Years ago I had a friend who arranged her life exactly like this, including the last panel! But then after dating for years the two of them spoiled it all by running away together.

  3. Anarcissie commented on Ted Rall 16 days ago

    Yes, the good old Communist Party of the USA, with two or three dozen ancient but semi-active members, decided to support Clinton. A sad betrayal of all they once claimed to stand for, but there it is. Anyone heard from the Temperance Party?

  4. Anarcissie commented on Ted Rall about 1 month ago

    Smaller parties, like the Greens, do run candidates in local elections.

  5. Anarcissie commented on Ted Rall 3 months ago

    I think Mr. Rall’s point is not that the situation in the US is equal to the Third Reich, but that you can easily put the arguments of racists into a Nazi context without alteration, for example, ‘What about Jew on Jew violence?’ For racists, this means their arguments are no longer entertaining, and they should come up with some new ones. Too limited mentally? Work harder, guys!

  6. Anarcissie commented on Ted Rall 5 months ago

    Clinton voted in favor of the invasion of Iraq, which was a war crime by the standards of the Nuremberg War Crimes trials. Given her supposed powers, intelligence, experience, and connections, it is very difficult to believe that she didn’t know that the justification for the war was bogus. She was, then, almost certainly an informed, willing accomplice before the fact, that is, guilty of participating in a war crime. I don’t see this as being much different from the other war criminals of the era such as Bush, Cheney, Rice, Powell, Rumsfeld, and so on. Of course the facts could only be established positively by a formal war crimes trial, which we will never have, so we have to go by what we can observe. Her political behavior since 2002 shows that she is enthusiastic about military operations and indifferent to both practical and moral objections to them.

    To vote for a criminal is to attach oneself morally to their criminality. Your vote will probably not change the outcome of the election, but it might change you.

  7. Anarcissie commented on Ted Rall 5 months ago

    Unfortunately, she is one of the problems. She is certainly a warmonger, and is possibly an outright war criminal by the standards of the Nuremberg War Crimes trials. I don’t see anything insane in calling attention to the fact that she supported to murder of hundreds of thousands people in Iraq and elsewhere not as necessity, but simply for political advantage. Yes, Trump has indicated he would act similarly. It is morally impossible to vote for either of them.

  8. Anarcissie commented on Ted Rall 5 months ago

    Strategic voting has always been pointless with regard to the outcome of elections, but it makes the voters who practice it feel savvy and important. This is especially gratifying to marginal-group voters such as those who call themselves ‘progressives’, since they can have endless discussions and arguments about it, producing great quantities of verbiage.

  9. Anarcissie commented on Ted Rall 6 months ago

    Both of them are dangerous. Clinton is a war freak and a plutocrat, and nobody knows what Trump is. Clinton’s machine has handed us a choice between two monsters.

  10. Anarcissie commented on Ted Rall 7 months ago

    Real estate in fashionable places like San Francisco and New York is inflated by funny money from the Federal government, which is available to the rich at near-zero interest. This is not going to go on forever.