A Recent Favorite:

Uh Oh, Nothing Here Yet

Why don't you go browse some Comics or Editorials and pick a few to favorite?

Recent Comments

  1. micalk commented on Calvin and Hobbes almost 4 years ago

    you misspelled ‘servants’.

    :~)

  2. micalk commented on Calvin and Hobbes almost 4 years ago

    Better to send a message than to take one.

  3. micalk commented on Doonesbury almost 4 years ago

    Party in Power

    Civil War ………………… Republican Spanish American …. Republican Grenada ………………… Republican Panama …………………. Republican Persian Gulf …………… Republican Iraq ………………………… Republican AfPak ……………………… Republican

    What’s yer point?

  4. micalk commented on Calvin and Hobbes almost 4 years ago

    he’ll be lucky to live so long…

    me: some stupid remark using the word “Pig!” Officer: “How old are you, kid?” me: “Fifteen.” Officer: “Want to live to see sixteen?”

  5. micalk commented on Doonesbury almost 4 years ago

    JP- Please cite a valid reference to your assertion that he (or his campaign) stated he was born in Kenya. The way you present it (“it was told”) is exactly like the current ‘birther’ argument. Somebody said it, so “it was told”. Who told it, and were they in a position to know? WND refers to an “apparently archived” report from 2004, but the html structure for the archived newspaper articles and the “apparently archived” report are different, and other articles referenced have been since corrected.

    Saying so doesn’t make it so.

  6. micalk commented on Calvin and Hobbes almost 4 years ago

    Yukoner said He has the makings of a politician.

    Yes, but for good or for evil?

  7. micalk commented on Doonesbury about 4 years ago

    Willy ‘n Ethel today:

    If you want to be all you can be… You have to eat all you can eat!

  8. micalk commented on Doonesbury over 4 years ago

    Lou/Fred-

    wow, you guys are harsh. I’ll bet people are glad when you take time off from your jobs.

  9. micalk commented on Doonesbury over 4 years ago

    Why do people think that their cause is necessarily that of (insert name here). Is it because they share a common view of one issue or even several issues? Goals are different from cause of the day, tho, and certainly, GBT has goals that differ as widely from mine as anyone’s here. You can criticize or praise him for what he does with his strip, but it is unfair to aim that criticism (or praise) against him for what he doesn’t cover. Why doesn’t he cover pro-choice/anti-abortion? Why doesn’t he cover spousal abuse? (Maybe he has, I’m not so much an aficionado that I’d know.) Why doesn’t he cover the fact that my Wired magazine didn’t arrive in time for me to take it on my flight last week? Maybe he doesn’t care. Or maybe his goals for the strip are different than mine and yours, different than what you think they should be.

  10. micalk commented on Doonesbury almost 5 years ago

    She should be in the Olympics! Note how she kips her feet around, then jumps inside her pivot arm? She’s AWESOME!