A Recent Favorite:

Recent Comments

  1. WillowsDreaming GoComics Pro Member commented on Rose is Rose 4 months ago

    And I know he’s Rose’s nephew so it’s his Meemaw too but as I said his mother is not there so he shouldn’t be there either. Waste of ink.

  2. WillowsDreaming GoComics Pro Member commented on Rose is Rose 4 months ago

    Happy Independence Day to you as well. :)

    Now then….What is the reason for ruining that lovely scene by putting the nasty little gluttonous brat in the middle of it? His mother isn’t there, why does he need to be in the middle of Rose’s family? Seriously enough of that horrid little character. It’s way past time for him to be retired.

  3. WillowsDreaming GoComics Pro Member commented on Rose is Rose 4 months ago

    I’m on the Clem needs to go bandwagon!!!!!
    There are no redeeming characteristics to that character at all. I agree with Sharon Hayes, It sets a bad example for kids who might still get to read the strip. The times Clem has any sort of repercussions are sadly too few and way too far between. When he does something bad he should have to face a not pleasant to him consequence of his behavior.

  4. WillowsDreaming GoComics Pro Member commented on Working Daze 8 months ago

    Hey John what’s up are you a king.com shareholder?

    Two years before Candy Crush there was an app for a game called Candy Swipe. It was developed by a small independent developer who taught himself code and developed the game in memory of his mother. (see the link at bottom of comment) Basically King stole the whole design for Candy Crush from Candy Swipe.

    King has been trying to copyright the name “Candy” but this hasn’t went thru yet. In the mean time they pulled some fast deals to buy up an old defunct company that used the name Candy Crusher way back in 2004. So now they can say they had the rights to the name before Candy Swipe and can therefore negate Candy Swipe’s Trademark and totally get away with literally stealing an independent developers game from him. It is absolutely disgusting!

    Here’s more on the story from Forbes.com

    http://www.forbes.com/sites/davidthier/2014/02/12/candy-swipe-dev-pens-furious-open-letter-to-candy-crush-makers/

  5. WillowsDreaming GoComics Pro Member commented on Working Daze 8 months ago

    Basically King stole the whole design for Candy Crush from Candy Swipe. They then pulled some fast deals to buy up an old defunct company that used the name Candy Crusher way back in 2004 so now they can say they had the rights to the name before Candy Swipe and can therefore negate Candy Swipes Copyright and totally get away with literally stealing an independent developers game from him. It’s disgusting!

    Open letter to King.com who wants to cancel the registration of the CandySwipe trademark.

    http://www.candyswipe.com/king.html

  6. WillowsDreaming GoComics Pro Member commented on Off the Mark 11 months ago

    They’re burning some of Santa’s coal they got on the QT from some enterprising young Elves! =D lol

  7. WillowsDreaming GoComics Pro Member commented on Thatababy about 1 year ago

    Mom & Dad need to go to Think Geek and get him the TaunTaun sleeping bag! ;)

  8. WillowsDreaming GoComics Pro Member commented on Get Fuzzy over 1 year ago

    I’m wondering why we are getting reruns from 2011 and have been for months? So Darby what’s going on?

  9. WillowsDreaming GoComics Pro Member commented on Over the Hedge over 2 years ago

    Silly Verne, Turtles have to make snow angels on their tummies!! :D

  10. WillowsDreaming GoComics Pro Member commented on Lio about 3 years ago

    Oh hecks yeah Lio’!!! Rock on with the classic!

    Those sparkly things are not worthy of being called vampires of anything except the wallets of stupid teenage girls.