Member since September 15, 2008
This user has no shared collections.
View More Collections
Why don't you go browse some
and pick a few to favorite?
commented on Michael Ramirez
2 days ago
All those who think congress needs to ignore racial bigotry and discrimination… move to…er……South Africa…..er……Nazi Germany……er……the Jim Crow South…..er………..dang, I cannot think of any place in 2014 where you would be happy.
Just because like to hear yourself talk ad nauseam , doesn’t make you sound any smarter. So just keep being a parrot for Fox News and the right wing, it’s actually pretty funny!
I would hardly call you representative of the “general public”.
commented on Annie
4 days ago
I still want to know why loyal, all-American superpatriot Oliver Warbucks moved his operations out of the US.
commented on Steve Benson
5 days ago
OK, I’ll change my post. Had FDR reacted to Pearl Harbor the way Bush did to 9/11, we would have gone to war against the Dominican Republic.
Had FDR reacted to Pearl Harbor the way Bush did to 9/11, we would have gone to war against Luxembourg.
commented on The Martian Confederacy
8 days ago
It seems to me that someone mixed up the order of installments for this story.
commented on Jane's World
10 days ago
I often eat a bowl of ice cream while watching “Rachel Maddow”. I suppose that a bowl of Frosted Flakes wouldn’t be any less healthy. At least it has some fiber.
Harvey Kellogg was a nutritionally conscious physician whose idea was to create a healthy, convienient, whole grain food. He would be aghast if he could see the sugary rot-tooth stomach ache garbage that is being marketed under his name today.
commented on Jerry Holbert
10 days ago
Bush/Cheney/Rummy had anointed international con-artist Ahmed Chalabi to be Iraq’s puppet dictator. When that didn’t work, they installed Al-Maliki
commented on Matt Wuerker
12 days ago
What is needed is an “instant runoff” voting system, where voters can designate their second choice and even third choice..Suppose, for example, a certain race has three candidates, a conservative Republican, a moderate Democrat, and a Socialist. Let’s say that the Republican gets 45% of the vote, the Democrat 43%, and the Socialist 12%. Under our present system the Republican would win. Under an instant runoff system the Socialist would be eliminated and those who voted Socialist would have their second choice votes tallied. Presumably, most of the Socialist voters would have designated the Democrat as their second choice, so that the Democrat would win with roughly 55% of the votes..Lest someone accuse me of favoring a system that would favor the left, I will point out that the system works both ways. Suppose, for example, a certain race has three candidates, a moderate Republican, a liberal Democrat, and a Tea Party candidate. Let’s say that the Democrat gets 45% of the vote, the Republican 43%, and the Tea Party candidate 12%. Under our present system the Democrat would win. Under an instant runoff system the Tea Party candidate would be eliminated and those who voted Tea Party would have their second choice votes tallied. Presumably, most of the Tea Party voters would have designated the Republican as their second choice, so that the Republican would be the winner with 55% of the votes.
Copyright © 2014. Universal Uclick, All rights reserved.