The original Butterfly Effect was a weakness of a climate model having too few data points. i.e. if I make a climate model and have only 100 places where I collect data, each of those 100 points has a huge effect on the model. Hence a butterfly flapping at a collection point makes the model go haywire and extreme, and predict a huge storm.
Since then, chaos theory does seem to show small changes in a system sometimes have huge real consequences. And the Butterfly Effect seems to be accepted by the public as real, and not as a flaw in climate modeling.
I put after tax money in an IRA in the 1970’s. When I started to take RMD’s in 2011, I found the 1976 form 8606. Without that old 8606, I would have had to pay taxes on some money that had already been taxed.
The original butterfly effect was a comment about models that had too few data inputs. If you only had 100 data points in your model, odd data in one of them – the butterfly flaps its wings there – could cause your model to erroneously predict a hurricane. Somehow this is now used as if its real.
It’s hard for us Scrooge’s to understand this joke if we NEVER spend money at a Starbucks, but always make coffee at home. Always because of the cost.(What’s a Venti? The joke implies it costs more than a Grande. But Grande sounds like it’s very grand.)
When I was 12, I got ether for having tonsils out. I dreamed I was a round ball, alone in a dark universe, spinning and saying “being, being, being.” This Boltzmann stuff scares me that my dream might be true.
I’m reading this with a cardboard box under my monitor. With Amazon swooshes on the box.