A Recent Favorite:

Uh Oh, Nothing Here Yet

Why don't you go browse some Comics or Editorials and pick a few to favorite?

Recent Comments

  1. John Locke commented on Ted Rall 4 days ago

    Government training programs are notoriously ineffective. The best training for a job is a job. Government doesn’t make jobs, other than public employees. “Rich” people and corporations make jobs. So, if the economy is good, employment is good.

  2. John Locke commented on Ted Rall 11 days ago

    Where did you get the idea that God was all merciful and forgiving? God CAN be merciful and forgiving, but he is most certainly JUST. Be good. A warning.

  3. John Locke commented on Ted Rall 11 days ago

    Atheism = the belief that the world was created by random chance. Out of chaos, order by accident. . .

    And the Lord said, let there be light, and there was a Big Bang.

  4. John Locke commented on Ted Rall 11 days ago

    When the atheist dies, and there is no God, no loss. When he dies and finds there is a God, he’s cooked. When the believer dies, and there is no God, no loss. When he dies, and finds there is a God, he’s good. Which set of odds seems the best to play?

  5. John Locke commented on Pat Oliphant 14 days ago

    OK. I take your meaning. I should have used only one (vicious) adjective for the noun instead of (vicious AND cold-blooded) two. I guess that could be argued. You certainly aren’t arguing against using the noun, killers, are you? Whew! You are a tough editor.

  6. John Locke commented on Pat Oliphant 14 days ago

    Well, I guess you’re saying it is gratuitous. Please explain why a clear and accurate description of Islamic terrorists as vicious, cold-blooded, killers is “uncalled for” or “lacking good reason” or “unwarranted”. Are they not vicious? Are they not cold-blooded? Are they not killers?

  7. John Locke commented on Michael Ramirez 14 days ago

    Surely, he wouldn’t have traveled to France with a pharonic court of hundreds of retainers following along, costing fabulous amounts of tax dollars. Or, would he have? Surely, he wouldn’t have played golf while in France! Or, would he have? Surely, men of good concience can examine the actions of those in power and draw their conclusions without ridicule. Or, can we?

  8. John Locke commented on Michael Ramirez 14 days ago

    I agree that that is O’s intent, but when it is too obvious/flagrant, the ploy is exposed as a ploy.

  9. John Locke commented on Pat Oliphant 14 days ago

    Gratuitous? Are you saying that it would be gratuitous insult to call Islamic terrorists vicious, cold-blooded, killers?

  10. John Locke commented on Michael Ramirez 14 days ago

    Using a favorite term of the Administration, the “optics” on the President’s absence is terrible! Major, major goof.