Prickly City by Scott Stantis

Prickly City

Comments (16) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. langchris70

    langchris70 said, almost 2 years ago

    @ReFlex-76

    I just LOVE how drug addicts can apparently post something extremely false on a comic strip site at 2am and get away with it.

  2. j gray

    j gray said, almost 2 years ago

    Perhaps not one was turned down, but apparently several dozen are STILL waiting for an answer years later.

    And a few just quit

  3. langchris70

    langchris70 said, almost 2 years ago

    @ReFlex-76

    Here you might want to read this after coming down from your last toke, if you can read at a higher level than People magazine:

    http://conservativeintel.com/2013/06/25/no-there-are-no-indications-irs-targeted-progressives-as-it-did-tea-party-groups/#

  4. pallent

    pallent GoComics PRO Member said, almost 2 years ago

    The tea-buggers just happened to get caught in the same net as thousands of other fish: they were the only ones who felt the need to call out the man they most hate. Another non-story full of old news on a slow news week.

  5. Davison77

    Davison77 said, almost 2 years ago

    “Teabagger” is a disgusting term and shouldn’t be used.

  6. catzilla23

    catzilla23 GoComics PRO Member said, almost 2 years ago

    I have no problem with denying conservative political groups tax exempt status by claiming they are community service groups, I have a problem with liberal/progressive groups getting that status with no scrutiny whatsoever.

  7. Comic Minister

    Comic Minister said, almost 2 years ago

    Oh no! Kevin’s back.

  8. Night-Gaunt49

    Night-Gaunt49 said, almost 2 years ago

    @ReFlex-76

    Also the IRS didn’t do anything illegal or unethical. Strange but true.

  9. Night-Gaunt49

    Night-Gaunt49 said, almost 2 years ago

    @Ionizer

    Cons used it till they found out it is also slang for a type of sexual activity. I guess they didn’t want to fight to get it back.

  10. Potrzebie

    Potrzebie said, almost 2 years ago

    @Ionizer

    T-baggers hould not have adopted that name before testing marketability. According to lore, t-baggers started using it to describe themselves.

  11. Tax Man

    Tax Man said, almost 2 years ago

    @ReFlex-76

    Many of them are still waiting. Not being approved is being denied.

    And I notice that, once again, because facts are not on your side you resort to name calling. How old are you—12?

  12. Night-Gaunt49

    Night-Gaunt49 said, almost 2 years ago

    Guessing that I am one what?
    -
    I’d tell you to read more of my writings first.

  13. Night-Gaunt49

    Night-Gaunt49 said, almost 2 years ago

    @ReFlex-76

    They targeted also those groups with “Progressive” and also “Israel” in their names. No favoritism. Darrel Issa kept that back so he can continue is witch hunt and waste millions of dollars.

  14. Night-Gaunt49

    Night-Gaunt49 said, almost 2 years ago

    @swr

    You do a poor job of defining what you mean.

  15. langchris70

    langchris70 said, over 1 year ago

    @ReFlex-76

    And thousands that were in processes not getting any sort of paperwork at all.

    You want to try to misuse semantics, go to the Webster’s site.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (1).