Prickly City by Scott Stantis

Prickly City

Comments (36) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. exoticdoc2

    exoticdoc2 said, over 1 year ago

    And now the Obamanation declares he has the right to use drones to kill Americans on American soil. Normally, if these people were terrorists I would agree. The point is that if a conservative president had made this claim the libs would be going hog wild denouncing him. Conservatives are supposedly the warmongers and along comes the Obamanation to demonstrate their hypocrisy.

  2. jnik23260

    jnik23260 said, over 1 year ago

    I thought you Neoclowns would be glad the Dems are behaving the way you would! But no, you gotta object because they’re Dems!

  3. randayn

    randayn GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    @jnik23260

    You’re both wrong. If a principle is valid, it will carry. If it is okay under Obama, then it was okay under Bush. Likewise, if you objected when Bush did it, you must object to Obama doing it. Anything else is intellectually dishonest.

  4. Johnathon Handy

    Johnathon Handy said, over 1 year ago

    This administration is just continuing on the principles of the last one. The Govt. is not in our control, and it hasn’t been for a long time. Because just in case you haven’t noticed, only one congressman has come out hard against this and they are portraying him as a nut. Objection to killing americans on american soil should be causing riots in the halls of congress, but instead we are getting silence, from both sides of the aisles, that Is disturbingly deafening.

  5. zellman

    zellman said, over 1 year ago

    @exoticdoc2

    “Normally, if these people were terrorists I would agree.”
    This is a bit of a slippery slope, it all depends on what constitutes a terrorist, and since drone strikes are carried out without a trial, the feds would be prosecutor, judge, and executioner. No American, even criminal ones, should fall into a category where they are not “protected” by the courts from militant police action.

  6. zoidknight

    zoidknight said, over 1 year ago

    @zellman

    Actually the Constution does protect them. However bills passed by the democrats and Obama eliminate that protection.

  7. zoidknight

    zoidknight said, over 1 year ago

    @Johnathon Handy

    Actually, no he is not. He is following the principles established by Castro, Stalin, Chavez, and such.

  8. bluffwood

    bluffwood said, over 1 year ago

    people who support the president are fools. You’ll be in his sights just like the rest of us.

  9. Davison77

    Davison77 said, over 1 year ago

    Using drones to kill enemy combatants in a war zone is one thing, but using drones to kill American citizens in the U.S. is unconstitutional. U.S. citizens have a right to a trial by a jury of their peers. The president can’t be judge, jury, and executioner.

  10. no1scouse

    no1scouse said, over 1 year ago

    @randayn

    Agreed. Most political parties when in office behave just like the others. Bureaucratic intransigence governs the country. Or is that bureaucratic incompetence?

  11. Davison77

    Davison77 said, over 1 year ago

    @ Ionizer
    The constitution states that the president can’t be judge, jury, and executioner. Of course that doesn’t stop some people.

  12. Doctor Toon

    Doctor Toon said, over 1 year ago

    If only there were anti-Troll drones…

  13. Tigger

    Tigger GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    @jnik23260

    No, just showing the irony,you’re agaisnt War unless a Democrat President starts the war. You want Gitmo closed unless a Democrat President wants to keep Gitmo open

  14. Tigger

    Tigger GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    @randayn

    Thank You!

  15. Tigger

    Tigger GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    @Johnathon Handy

    Agreed

  16. Load the rest of the comments (21).