Prickly City by Scott Stantis

Prickly City

Comments (12) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. zoidknight

    zoidknight said, over 2 years ago

    But we have to make sure you are loyal to Chairman Obamao, or we will be forced to send in the drones to enforce your loyalty.

  2. KPOM

    KPOM said, over 2 years ago

    You could send an e-mail instead. Or maybe not. The Obama administration wants to expand warrant-less e-mail searches:

    http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57552225-38/senate-bill-rewrite-lets-feds-read-your-e-mail-without-warrants/?part=rss&subj=news&tag=title

  3. George Buce

    George Buce GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    Silly troll, learn your history before you post. Instead of blaming the “other” (Kenyan) for your loss of civil liberties, know that this all started under W….

  4. wagnertinatlanta

    wagnertinatlanta said, over 2 years ago

    How mucn of the word “expand” do I have to explain to you?

  5. Badfisherman

    Badfisherman said, over 2 years ago

    @George Buce

    Maybe started BUT, Barry’s “Executive Orders” are destroying the entire Constitution.

  6. Night-Gaunt49

    Night-Gaunt49 GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    @George Buce

    Then you would know that it started some time before Bush & Reagan.

  7. Night-Gaunt49

    Night-Gaunt49 GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    @Badfisherman

    So did you complain when Shrub had many more executive orders that helped things along including creation of the Department of Homeland Security? If not then the partisanship will cut your throat for being blind.

  8. Night-Gaunt49

    Night-Gaunt49 GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    @zoidknight

    The Surveillance state was a bi-partisan affair oh blind one. They are both in it. But then Pres. Obama is a Conservative and Regressive. So no joy there for us.

  9. KPOM

    KPOM said, over 2 years ago

    @Night-Gaunt49

    Ah, yes, the old “Bush did it, so it must be OK” argument from an Obamanot. It ranks right up there with the “it’s Bush’s fault” argument.

    I don’t care whether the people snooping on my phone calls or reading my e-mails have (D) or® after their names.

  10. KPOM

    KPOM said, over 2 years ago

    @Night-Gaunt49

    From what I recall, the DHS had strong bi-partisan support, as did No Child Left Behind and the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

  11. scsurfer

    scsurfer said, over 2 years ago

    Come on guys, this all started back when Nixon’s feds started following war protesters and such around. What makes you think it ever stopped?

  12. spamster

    spamster said, over 2 years ago

    Actually the attack on civil liberties in the USA started about 1776. That why the bill of rights had to be added as amendments. The constitutional congress couldn’t get the constitution ratified with those rights in it. But they were fairly certain they could get them passed after the fact. If individual rights and liberties had really been a priority in the first place it wouldn’t have been a problem.

  13. Refresh Comments.