Paul Szep by Paul Szep

Paul Szep

Comments (8) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Rad-ish

    Rad-ish GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    The squawks of hawks.

  2. Silmenume

    Silmenume said, about 1 year ago

    As bad a Chamberlain’s efforts were and I agree they were awful, he WAS negotiating from a position of weakness while trying to buy time to rearm England. Obrainless is not negotiating from a position of weakness and offered concession without ANY solid changes on the central problem. IOW he gave away and got nothing in return. And for those so called “doves”, remember Iran is the one rushing to dominate. Note also this accord is already driving other ME powers to seek nuclear weapons. This treaty is absolute idiocy on every level.

  3. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    At least one thing in his “credit”(?) Netanyahu HAS participated personally in the killing “game”, unlike our own “CHICKENhawks”. I still don’t like, or trust the guy, a whit, he’s NUTS! (and, even though he’s “sabra”, born in Israel, he was mostly raised, and educated, in the U.S. gaining him more “cred” with AIPAC, our own little “radical group”)


    Again, I don’t have a problem with many Israelis, and Jewish people in general, but the extremist right-wing Zionist wing, is a bird that carries many bombs, and uses them regularly, and is definitely NOT the “sitting duck” they like to play at being on the world stage. Their little , preemptive attacks, “wars”, and invasions such as Lebanon, have more than proved they’re quite capable of defending themselves, and they have the only nukes in the Middle East.


    WE don’t need to keep fighting THEIR wars for THEM, and sacrificing the blood of OUR troops!

  4. lonecat

    lonecat said, about 1 year ago

    @Silmenume

    You say “his accord is already driving other ME powers to seek nuclear weapons.” Gosh, do you think Israel will seek nuclear weapons, too?

  5. churchillwasright

    churchillwasright said, about 1 year ago

    Why do those on the left only think there were 2 choices: this idiotic agreement or war? The sanctions that were in place were working, and was the only thing that brought Iran to the negotiating table. Instead of negotiating from a position of strength, the G5 + 1 capitulated and signed a deal that was weaker than the previous UN’s resolutions, and get nothing in return.

  6. ODon

    ODon said, about 1 year ago

    @lonecat

    “…the Lord’s our Shepard says the psalm, but in case…we better get a bomb.”
    My thanks to the great Tom Lehrer.

  7. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    ChurchIe: because those on the extreme right keep chanting “bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb Iran”. A true position of “strength” would be letting Iran pursue their commercial, peaceful, use of nuclear energy, like we allowed Japan, Germany, France, and encourage other third world countries to ACCEPT as viable, while using the international community (not Israel’s view) to regulate that use (which Israel refused to comply with).

  8. churchillwasright

    churchillwasright said, about 1 year ago

    @dtroutma

    I take it from your post that you are unaware of that Zionist political body, the UN, and their sanctions and resolutions regarding Iran?

  9. Refresh Comments.