Paul Szep by Paul Szep

Paul Szep

Comments (4) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Rad-ish

    Rad-ish GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    Ima loves murderous corruption.

  2. Zuhlamon

    Zuhlamon GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    So the existence of lobbyists for other interests excuses the murderous result of the NRA?

  3. mickey1339

    mickey1339 GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    “Not one word do I hear about non-lethal….”


    I thought you might find this interesting. It’s along the line of the “non-lethal” genre of weapons. I rarely agree with Ima (the idea makes me itch) but her remark about the NRA is true. They spent 20 million dollars lobbying congress. Many other huge corporate conglomerates have spent that and more. Both sides of the aisle need the bashing you refer to, I’d prefer to replace the whole mess and start over. First rule would be no one over 50 would be allowed to run. Lobbying would be a 10 year felony punishable in a “hard time” prison, no country club resorts like they have now.


    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-lethal_weapon

  4. mickey1339

    mickey1339 GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    “Sorry msima, the NRA will be by shortly.”


    I read your link and did the math for a sampling size using the NRA membership at 4 million. Their 1,000 person sampling is .025% of the total. Unless I’m missing something my statistics training would consider that an insufficient sampling size for a valid result. If they sampled 4,000 that would at least be 1%.


    I personally support background checks but I’m a Libertarian and generally disagree with both “mainstream parties.”

  5. Refresh Comments.
Calvin and Hobbes 30th Anniversary