Paul Szep by Paul Szep

Paul Szep

Recommended

Comments (23) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. lisapaloma13

    lisapaloma13 said, about 1 year ago

  2. Tigger

    Tigger GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    Protected

  3. Adrian Snare

    Adrian Snare said, about 1 year ago

    @Tigger

    There is NO earthly need for lethal self defense.
    There is a need for 100% computerized “background checks, my version”.

  4. zoidknight

    zoidknight said, about 1 year ago

    @Adrian Snare

    No, there is a need. When seconds count, the police are minutes away. The only ones who think that we do not have the right to defend ourselves are those criminals who are protecting the criminals.

  5. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    What about cannons? protected. what about a blunderbuss? protected. or how about the sniper rifle of the time the Kentucky long rifle? protected. how about the bayonets that are still used today Mr. President. protected. Obama an expert on the constitution, not, or history, not.
    Again the 2nd is about personal responsibility and what mommy government “shall not infringe” on you. Not the other way around.

  6. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    @Adrian Snare

    New button “I only use non lethal self defense in this house” I will put that with my bullet proof “gun free zone” sticker and your button “I know how to call 9 11”

  7. ODon

    ODon said, about 1 year ago

    @zoidknight

    When seconds count I don’t want to have to get to my gun safe. I’d rather call 911 and grab a can of mace. My family may get teary eyed but they can live with that.

  8. furnituremaker

    furnituremaker said, about 1 year ago

    the average person will hesitate before using lethal force…
    the average criminal probably won’t…so who gets shot?

  9. mickey1339

    mickey1339 GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    @Adrian Snare

    “There is no earthly need for lethal self defense.”


    Home invasion robberies, sometimes including rapes and murders were gaining popularity amongst the criminal elements, hitting those “quiet middle class neighborhoods.”
    Then an amazing thing happened, people started shooting the home invasion types and the frequency dropped off amazingly quickly. To the credit of the police they just considered it ’self defense."

  10. bubblehead

    bubblehead GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    the 2nd amendment doesn’t say anything about guns either. it says “arms”, which are any weapon. And unless we are going to go all the way and say govt can’t regulate nuclear weapons, rocket launchers, etc., then why not guns. there is nothing in the Constitution or bill of rights that protects all guns specifically. we regulate speech, why not arms. let’s debate what is “reasonable” regulation regarding arms as a Constitutional issue and then lets also have an evidenced based discussion on the effectiveness of public policies. the screaming 2nd amendment defenders and the anti-guns crowd calling anyone that supports guns as crazy doesn’t help, unfortunately it all plays well in the lazy mainstream media (no, not left or right, just lazy and greedy).

  11. Kylie2112

    Kylie2112 said, about 1 year ago

    @Harleyquinn

    Cool, I want some anti-aircraft turrets and a nuclear missile silo in my backyard.

  12. Bruce4671

    Bruce4671 GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    At the time, muskets WERE assault weapons.

  13. mickey1339

    mickey1339 GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    @Mr. King

    King, that’s why one reason they need to add in a ’secure storage" clause to the law.

  14. Gresch

    Gresch GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    …so what stop Washington from declaring himself King?

  15. cb1966

    cb1966 said, about 1 year ago

    It seems that Mr. Szep is suggesting that the 2nd amendment was written in the 18th century when “arming” oneself was completely different in scope and magnitude, and that now that times have changed, it is time to modify the 2nd amendment to reflect current “arms”.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (8).