Comments (8) Jump to Comments Form

1. 

   GNWachs said, 4 months ago

   Isn’t it ironic that Congress wants everyone else to have an inferior plan but for themselves and their families…

2. 

   4uk4ata said, 4 months ago

   Well, most everyone else already has an inferior plan… Jokes aside, did not Obama’s proposal call for the public option being based on what Congress is using?

3. 

   rlsaxion said, 4 months ago

   Well, why should they live under the same constraints as commoners? Surely you don’t think you are the same as they are? Please! Do you get 110% of your salary when you retire? I sure won’t. So why would you think that the rich politicians would provide everyone else with what they work so hard to give themselves? Delusional much?

4. 

   believecommonsense said, 4 months ago

   Yep, most others already have an inferior plan, and at greater personal cost out of pocket. But then we commoners don’t get a free car and driver, tax-free per diem payments, etc.

   New constitutional amendment: Congress shall receive compensation and benefits no greater than the median compensation and benefits of the U.S. population.

   I vote YES!

5. 

   fennec said, 4 months ago

   Congress has the same health plan coverage that all the rest of the Feds have. (You know, all us lazy layabout civil servants.) Look it up by Googling FEHP and educate yourselves on what exactly it is.

6. 

   dtroutma said, 4 months ago

   Actually the FEHB is the plan option, with options available from “private” companies, they’re looking at. While not every employee has access to Walter Reed and other perks, one might also look back at how “wonderful” going to Reed really was.

7. 

   churchillwasright said, 4 months ago

   Read and sign the petition supporting House Resolution 615 here:

   http://tinyurl.com/m8xxud

8. 

   Cpt. Jay said, 4 months ago

   Yeah, I wish I had the Congressional plan: Primera Blue Cross Blue Shield…