Pat Oliphant by Pat Oliphant

Pat Oliphant

Comments (15) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. ahab

    ahab GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    Funny stuff! Ah pageantry, ain’t it grand? Love the priest’s handshake, kinda like milking a cow.

  2. Rad-ish

    Rad-ish GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    He’s been married to long and wants to play the field.

  3. Godfreydaniel

    Godfreydaniel said, about 2 years ago

    Not milking a cow so much as picking a pocket, when it comes to most priests, reverends, clerics, bishops, Popes, televangelists, ayatollahs……is there anybody here I haven’t offended?

  4. cjr53

    cjr53 said, about 2 years ago

    @Godfreydaniel

    Atheists perhaps.

  5. walruscarver2000

    walruscarver2000 said, about 2 years ago

    @cjr53

    I’m an atheist myself, but I keep it very quiet since most of the atheist I see go out of their way to be offensive to others who are not.

  6. pif71vder

    pif71vder GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    The righteous straight strangely interested in the variants and their violent adventures.

  7. walruscarver2000

    walruscarver2000 said, about 2 years ago

    @DrCanuck

    Sorry, I’ll go quietly.

  8. emptc12

    emptc12 said, about 2 years ago

    @Godfreydaniel

    Johannes Brahms, as quoted by Oscar Levant:
    .
     “If there is anyone here whom I have not insulted, I beg his pardon.”
    .
    And another quote from Brahms I found while verifying the above:
    .
    “Those who enjoy their own emotionally bad health and who habitually fill their own minds with the rank poisons of suspicion, jealousy and hatred, as a rule take umbrage at those who refuse to do likewise, and they find a perverted relief in trying to denigrate them.”
    .
    O tempora! O mores!

  9. Leo Autodidact

    Leo Autodidact said, about 2 years ago

    @Ms. Ima

    That’s why Lawyers are bankrolling the “Gay Marriage” movement, theey want their “Cut” when Fred and Larry hit the skids.

  10. hippogriff

    hippogriff said, about 2 years ago

    Leo: You may be right, although I have found no evidence of it. Even if true, it is no excuse for deprivation of civil rights.

  11. dfowensby

    dfowensby said, about 2 years ago

    @hippogriff

    technically, there is no such category of “civil rights” supported anywhere in the Constitution. deviance and homosexual conduct were dealt with via banishment, or hangings back then. good policy.

  12. Ketira shena Pretarasedrin

    Ketira shena Pretarasedrin GoComics PRO Member said, about 2 years ago

    @dfowensby

    Excuse me? You may want to read this:
    http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/Civil_rights

  13. 38lowell

    38lowell said, about 2 years ago

    See the parishoners. Is the writing on the wall?

  14. Newenglandah

    Newenglandah said, about 2 years ago

    @dfowensby

    Slavery and wifebeating were ok back then too according to the law. Was that “good policy” as well?

  15. SABRSteve

    SABRSteve said, about 2 years ago

    That would be the 1600’s ailurophile. And tell me if it’s any worse than the past half century of the liberal decadence foisted on this country.

  16. Refresh Comments.