Pat Oliphant by Pat Oliphant

Pat Oliphant

Comments (17) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Bensondonald

    Bensondonald GoComics PRO Member said, over 3 years ago

    For those keeping score, a highly respected married man in a position of global responsibility has (allegedly consensual) sex with a hotel employee he evidently never met before that moment.

    Now we get stories demonizing the housekeeper. This just might help him beat a rape verdict, but it still points to amazingly stupid, reckless, irresponsible and immoral behavior on his part. For all we know recent IMF policy has been dictated by mobsters who have film of him with other housekeepers. At the very least, the IMF should be investigating that possibility.

  2. trimguy

    trimguy said, over 3 years ago


    There won’t BE a verdict: all charges have been dropped.

  3. meetinthemiddle

    meetinthemiddle said, over 3 years ago

    Ironically, the story in the US has gotten other people in France to come forward with similar allegations and file charges there. And DSK has file counter slander suits.

  4. grapfhics

    grapfhics said, over 3 years ago

    Ah, the French, so suave, so debonaire, so, so, so human.

  5. bdaverin

    bdaverin said, over 3 years ago


    Which is a shame. A woman can be a rape victim regardless of what other crimes she’s committed. But since character impeachment has long been a tradition in defending a client against rape charges, her checkered past is denying her the chance to plead her case.

  6. Clark  Kent

    Clark Kent said, over 3 years ago

    Put him in gitmo or abu ghraib. Correction, put IT in gitmo or abu ghraib. It does not deserve to be called a him.

  7. jack75287

    jack75287 said, over 3 years ago

    Kind of agree with you there Clark. Still putting him in Gitmo would only give him attention he should not have. General population at any prison would do.

  8. Simon_Jester

    Simon_Jester said, over 3 years ago

    In like Flynn

  9. Margaret

    Margaret GoComics PRO Member said, over 3 years ago


  10. dfowensby

    dfowensby said, over 3 years ago

    do they still use tape?

  11. phuh knees

    phuh knees said, over 3 years ago

    Brain transplant?
    Know any viable donors?
    Heck, your brain will do.
    It’s never been used…

  12. pirate227

    pirate227 said, over 3 years ago

    Oh, THE DSK, at first I thought it was a new dance. ;-)

  13. Michael wme

    Michael wme said, over 3 years ago

    English common law on rape isn’t a ‘he said, she said’ thing. The prosecution must prove sex took place (based on the story of Joseph and Pharaoh’s wife). A ‘Feminazi’ writing an op-ed for the NYT said that the woman’s word should be accepted disirregardless, she should need no objective evidence of sex provided by male forensic physicians.

    Under common law, once it has been proved that sex took place, the burden of proof is on the defence to prove she said ‘Yes.’ Defence attorneysslimeballs often claim that the victim’s clothes constitute an implicit ‘Yes,’ but this defence should always be (and often is) disallowed. Only a very clear indication of ‘Yes’ absolves the accused of rape.

    Of course, a taped call by the woman to her boyfriend saying that it was all a set-up is a valid defence, if that’s what it was. The supporters of the victim (if that’s what she was) say she knew about civil suits, and hoped to get some money for damages suffered, which is a perfectly legitimate desire on the part of a rape victim. Or was she saying she’d scammed a rich man? What the actual call by the victim meant will be argued for decades in law schools. Since she was told that the room was empty, a planned scam seems less likely, but an unplanned scam is still possible.

    But, at this point, nothing is clear, and, as with a certain woman in Florida very recently, or a football star in California a few years ago, under US law, anyone not accused of being an Enemy of the State is innocent until proven guilty.

  14. phuh knees

    phuh knees said, over 3 years ago

    Well, now that the object of my former retort has deleted their comment concerning “Libtards & Feminazis needing brain transplants,” my earlier statement has no context.
    But I continue to stand behind it, I mean, who couldn’t use nice, fresh, unused brain?

  15. jaxaction

    jaxaction said, over 3 years ago

    weak toon Pat! give us some MEAT (if you still can…

  16. Load the rest of the comments (2).