Non Sequitur is Wiley Miller's wry look at the absurdities of everyday life. A hit with fans of all ages, the strip is syndicated in more than 700 newspapers. Non Sequitur has received four National Cartoonists Society divisional awards, the most prestigious in cartooning. It is the only comic strip to win the coveted award in its first year of syndication and the only one to ever win in both the best comic strip and best comic panel categories.
This hilarious creation is not only creative but also clever. It tackles current cultural issues such as politics, celebrities, male-female relations, materialistic desires and society's obsession with weight. Non Sequitur will have you laughing at the controversy of everyday life.
Collectible Prints:
Collectible Prints are always available for all editions. Original art is available on a first-come, first-served basis. Just contact Wiley Miller for either.
Information on Non Sequitur original art: Upon availability, the original art sells for $375 for a daily edition, and $500 for a Sunday edition.
All original art, including most Sunday editions, are in black & white line art (color in newspapers is done in a separate process).
Information on prints:
Prints are available (black and white only) for any edition of Non Sequitur for $75 each.
Most Sunday editions are available in color prints for $150 each.
All prints are on high quality, 11" x 14" cardstock, suitable for framing.
If you would like to have either a print or original personally inscribed, please include a note indicating who it is to inscribed for. Otherwise, the work will NOT be signed.
© Wiley - All Rights Reserved.
New Adventures of Queen Victoria by Pab Sungenis
The Norm Classics by Michael Jantze
Comments (71) (Please sign in to comment)
comicgos said, about 2 years ago
Hmmm… I think Hell would be more interesting!
Earl Wash said, about 2 years ago
He wouldn’t fit even without the camel.
Dogsniff
said, about 2 years ago
Go for the wormhole.
rayannina said, about 2 years ago
A lot of people think that. It isn’t.
Clark Kent said, about 2 years ago
The fools are in “heaven” doing nothing but standing still on clouds, staring unblinking at “god” singing praises and hosannas to him in ever higher crescendos nonstop forever. That is the worst thing I can think of.
Thirdguy said, about 2 years ago
excuse me Clark but when the lightning hits, I really don’t want to be this close to you.
Lewreader said, about 2 years ago
Oh CLARK It might be standing for eternity knowing there was a great party and you refused the invitation.
As for the “eye of the needle”, it is a gate in Jeruselem a camel may enter by kneeling. Allegory, perhaps. You got forever to decide.
gmartin997
said, about 2 years ago
In truth, the Biblical “Eye of the Needle” was a narrow mountain pass where a rider had to dismount his camel to pass through it. Like most of the Bible, the statement was purely allegorical.
SQLMamma
said, about 2 years ago
“Eye of the needle” is not a gate in Jerusalem. That was a lie, probably fabricated by a ‘man of the cloth’ to assuage his guilt surrounding his greed.
When Jesus said that it’s easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich man to get into heaven, the disciples didn’t say, “Oh yeah, tough, but not impossible. Camels go through the gate all the time.”
No, they were shocked. They thought that wealth was a sign of God’s love and wondered then WHO can possibly get into heaven? Jesus was talking about the impossible.
The important thing is what comes next. Jesus looked at them and said, “With man this is impossible, but with God all things are possible.”
Monkmunk said, about 2 years ago
Haha! This is so true! How stupid is it that we don’t take everything the bible says completely seriously?
JohnnyDiego said, about 2 years ago
I always thought “Eye of the Needle” was a mundane novel by Ken Follett or an even worse movie by Richard Marquand. An allegory for boring, perhaps.
cdward said, about 2 years ago
Lewreader, SQLMamma is correct about the “Eye of the needle.” When Jesus said it, he meant it to be understood in those terms. Ultimately, what he meant was, those who have great wealth are condemning themselves because they love it more than pretty much anything else. Certainly, they love it more than the poor.
Regardless of your faith or lack thereof, love of wealth will kill your soul (or whatever life-giving force you choose). Say what you will about Jesus, in the gospels he is far more concerned with how the poor and disenfranchised are cared for than about sex. I recommend his approach.
cdward said, about 2 years ago
Oh, and Clark, I assume you don’t believe in heaven. Fine, but then it’s disingenuous to say what heaven is like. Generally, neither scripture nor the church say anything about what goes on there or what it looks like - only that it is a place of joy.
I know too many people who have all the goodies and parties and sex they want and are still miserable. So I’m assuming joy doesn’t reside there (even though I like those things okay).
grapfhics said, about 2 years ago
What will the GOP think now. SQLMomma? Does God love them or not? Tune in tomorrow, while the Government reassesses the budget and revenues.
BlackKnight15 said, about 2 years ago
and yet just by changing one letter in Koine Greek, camel becomes rope. “It is easier for a rope to pass through the eye of a needle…” Makes more sense. Nobody has the original to check…