Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller

Non Sequitur

Comments (20) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. pouncingtiger

    pouncingtiger said, over 5 years ago

    Ah! To have it both ways.

  2. LordDogmore

    LordDogmore said, over 5 years ago

    And remeber, he who ticks off the most people in the shortest amount of time, WINS!

  3. Baslim the beggar says, "Vanished is not vanquished."

    Baslim the beggar says, "Vanished is not vanquished." GoComics PRO Member said, over 5 years ago

    I think there is evidence that snakes used to have legs, so half of it works really well.

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2000/03/000317051940.htm

  4. LordDogmore

    LordDogmore said, over 5 years ago

    Of course snakes have legs. How else do you think Congress gets to their offices everyday?

  5. Manhunter808

    Manhunter808 said, over 5 years ago

    LOL! Good one, LordDogmore. (And unfortunately, TRUE!)

  6. Submachine

    Submachine said, over 5 years ago

    Kinda like the old “new math”.

  7. JonD17

    JonD17 said, over 5 years ago

    LordDogmore, I like your thinking.

  8. Radical-Knight

    Radical-Knight said, over 5 years ago

    It does say “Theory” which is to say no basis on fact or proof, just abstractions based upon perceived observations and imagination; whereas Theorems are derivations of logic, proof and existing evidence to provide a solution to real world situations.

    • That’s just my opinion, I could be wrong. Yeah, Jon … What LordDogmore said. >D

  9. DesultoryPhillipic

    DesultoryPhillipic said, over 5 years ago

    theorem are not antithetical to theories, indeed they can be an idea accepted or proposed as a demonstrable truth often as a part of a general theory

  10. Doctor Toon

    Doctor Toon GoComics PRO Member said, over 5 years ago

    Wiley - I think it’s brilliant. I’m also amazed the stupid debate hasn’t started yet. Let’s just enjoy this very funny comic and not spoil it by arguing all day folks, OK?

  11. ArthurAllen

    ArthurAllen said, over 5 years ago

    Radical-Knight: I have a “theory” that you exist based on images on my computer screen. But since it’s “just a theory,” I have to conclude that you don’t exist. Makes sense to me.

  12. benbrilling

    benbrilling GoComics PRO Member said, over 5 years ago

    Adam and Eve-olution!

  13. plus4

    plus4 said, over 5 years ago

    Sort of like “theistic evolution”: The compromise that retains the least appealing aspects of both sides! No wonder it would “tick off everyone,” as Wiley says. (I’m still waiting for someone to go the opposite route and propose “non-theistic creation.”)

  14. cartwrights

    cartwrights said, over 5 years ago

    Actually, for a lot of religious people (like myself), “theistic evolution” is very appealing as a personal belief, though we wouldn’t want it taught in public schools.

  15. grazer

    grazer said, over 5 years ago

    Good one, Wiley! Assuming you’re goal is to make everyone laugh, I will offer this….

    Science will prove the existance of God long before religion does.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (5).