Comics A-Z Navigation
Nick and Zuzu by Nick Galifianakis
The Norm 4.0 by Michael Jantze
About Non Sequitur
Non Sequitur is Wiley Miller's wry look at the absurdities of everyday life. A hit with fans of all ages, the strip is syndicated in more than 700 newspapers. Non Sequitur has received four National Cartoonists Society divisional awards, the most prestigious in cartooning. It is the only comic strip to win the coveted award in its first year of syndication and the only one to ever win in both the best comic strip and best comic panel categories.
This hilarious creation is not only creative but also clever. It tackles current cultural issues such as politics, celebrities, male-female relations, materialistic desires and society's obsession with weight. Non Sequitur will have you laughing at the controversy of everyday life.
Information on Non Sequitur original art: Upon availability, the original art sells for $375 for a daily edition, and $500 for a Sunday edition.
All original art, including most Sunday editions, are in black & white line art (color in newspapers is done in a separate process).
Information on prints: Prints are available (black and white only) for any edition of Non Sequitur for $75 each.
Most Sunday editions are available in color prints for $150 each.
All prints are on high quality, 11" x 14" cardstock, suitable for framing.
If you would like to have either a print or original personally inscribed, please include a note indicating who it is to inscribed for. Otherwise, the work will NOT be signed.
© Wiley - All Rights Reserved.
Comments (54) (Please sign in to comment)
cleokaya (THE FLASH) said, over 7 years ago
Logic…a lost art. Danae has created an alternate universe.
Joe Minotaur said, over 7 years ago
No. She just created Math Jeopardy.
pouncingtiger said, over 7 years ago
Danae just rediscovered political logic.
grazer said, over 7 years ago
I think our government beat her to it. They have mastered indepth feasibility studies over needless answers.
c00k13m0n5t3r said, over 7 years ago
Guys, guys…you make fun of her, but basically she re-invented inductive reasoning…first used by Aristotle, it is THE basis for the scientific method. Kudos to Danae…
Dutchboy1 said, over 7 years ago
That sounds like how evolutionists do it: come up a theory, then make up some ‘facts’ to explain it.
Michael Farren said, over 7 years ago
Better than Dutchboy’s process, where it’s lies from top to bottom.
Jackone said, over 7 years ago
Danae wears the same outfit summer & winter. She must not admit that winter is cold.
prasrinivara
said, over 7 years ago
Jackone, are you familiar with Little Dot? Dot had a closetful of near-identical (all polka-dotted, black-on-red) dresses. Maybe Danae has a closetful of skull-logo outfits, including seasonally-apt ones?
GuntotingLiberal said, over 7 years ago
Yes the “Shazam!” theory of life on earth is so much more factual and correct than the theory of evolution. Tell me, did God use a magic wand or just wave his arms? And on what evidence do you base your assertion.
Teresa said, over 7 years ago
So I guess if it isn’t about politics the debate randomly turns to evolutionary theory? I think my head needs to just remain firmly planted on my desk while reading Mr. Wiley’s daily cartoons. Or maybe I just need to stop looking at the frikken comments because of their pointlessness.
JonD17 said, over 7 years ago
Teresa, you head is much better off there firmly planted on your desk, than where some of the other talking heads on here are firmly planted. At least you can enjoy the sun when it is shining.
vexatron1984 said, over 7 years ago
It amuses me how people purely come on here to complain about the comments posted. If you don’t like them, then ignore them and comment on the ones you do like. Yes, I do realize I am now complaining about other comments myself, but this is the only time, I swear!
c00k13m0n5t3r, good observation, I hadn’t thought about it that way. Now if only my math instructors gave me the answers so I can try out this new system…
LeonardWatson said, over 7 years ago
furlong64 and others who buy into the THEORY of evolution:
One question: Have you ever actually read Darwin’s Origin’s of the Species or are you just parroting back what they taught you in biology class and in the media?
If you were to actually read Darwin you would find that while he personally believed in evolution, his thesis was really about adaptation and natural selection. He, himself never made the argument that humans evolved from apes or ultimately from a single celled organism that came out of a primordial ooze.
All of that nonsense is often credited to Darwin but in reality came from others who extrapolated on what Darwin wrote.
In the end there is as more scientific evidence for Intelligent Design, or even pure creationism, than there is for evolution.
PorkyPine said, over 7 years ago
Leonard Watson says:”In the end there is as more scientific evidence for Intelligent Design, or even pure creationism, than there is for evolution.”
Name one that isn’t just a negative attack on evolution or a “Evolution can’t explain x”.
The Theory of evolution is used to by biologists to determine what flu vaccines to use from one year to the next. What practical applications use Intelligent Design?
Name a peer-reviewed article that has been published in favor of Intelligent Design.