Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller
- December 08, 2008
- From Beginning
- Previous feature
- Show Calendar
- Next feature
- Current

Register for a FREE GoComics account and get this plus any other comic strip delivered to your Personalized Comic Page, Daily. With a free account you will be able to build a Comic Page filled with the Comics you want to see each day.
With the largest collection of Comics and Editorial Cartoons online there is plenty to choose from. Upgrade to a Comic Genius account (Only $.99/Month) and have unlimited archive access to decades of comics.
Register for a FREE GoComics account and get this or any other comic strip daily emailed daily. Comics and Editorial Cartoons are updated everyday so there is always something new.
With a free account you will receive one comic from your Personalized Comic Page daily. Upgrade to a Comic Genius account (Only $.99/Month) and get all of your comics emailed daily plus receive unlimited archive access to decades of comics.
Collectible Prints are always available for all editions. Original art is available on a first-come, first-served basis. Just contact Wiley Miller for either.
Information on Non Sequitur original art:Upon availability, the original art sells for $350 for a daily edition, and $450 for a Sunday edition.
All original art, including most Sunday editions, are in black & white line art (color in newspapers is done in a separate process).
Prints are available (black and white only) for any edition of Non Sequitur for $75 each.
Most Sunday editions are available in color prints for $150 each.
All prints are on high quality, 11" x 14" cardstock, suitable for framing.
If you would like to have either a print or original personally inscribed, please include a note indicating who it is to inscribed for. Otherwise, the work will NOT be signed.
About Non Sequitur
Non Sequitur is Wiley Miller’s wry look at the absurdities of everyday life. A hit with fans of all ages, the strip is syndicated in more than 700 newspapers. Non Sequitur has received four National Cartoonists Society divisional awards, the most prestigious in cartooning. It is the only comic strip to win the coveted award in its first year of syndication and the only one to ever win in both the best comic strip and best comic panel categories.This hilarious creation is not only creative but also clever. It tackles current cultural issues such as politics, celebrities, male-female relations, materialistic desires and society’s obsession with weight. Non Sequitur will have you laughing at the controversy of everyday life.
© 2009 Universal Press Syndicate - All Rights Reserved.
Copyright © 2009. UCLICK LLC, All rights reserved. Terms & Conditions - Privacy Policy


Comments (19) Jump to Comments Form
wndrwrthg
said,
11 months ago
The sharks circled slowly,cautiously. The smell of blood that had attracted them was faint,lingering,creating half formed memories of frenzies from the past. They were patient, they could wait, they could wait, and there were always the celebrities.
attyush said, 11 months ago
Reminds me of McCain’s joke in the late night show. “What is the difference between a lawyer and a catfish? One is a scum-eating, bottom-dwelling, low-life and the other is a fish”.
Doctor Toon
said,
11 months ago
The next step in the equal rights battle is gay marriage, which will indeed lead inevitably to some gay divorces. Lawyers are probably excited. It will be so much fun for them to fight it out over who gets to keep the house.
bilson said, 11 months ago
I just love the way WM always gives the protagonist an umbrella drink and the mainstream guy a big ol’ beer.
Danny Holstein said, 11 months ago
Good thing for the comments, I hadn’t realized a zig-zagged purple stripe on yellow meant, “gay”.
(I thought the umbrella drink signified that)
BirishB said, 11 months ago
bilson – Good call. Never noticed that before.
But if the suit’s got an umbrella drink, it makes me think he’s the antagonist, while the beer swiller is the protagonist. Maybe that’s my rose-colored glasses view …
GuntotingLiberal said, 11 months ago
Or maybe they’re just two (straight) guys at a bar, having a real discussion. You know, the type I haven’t seen in about a decade, since before everyone and his brother had a cellphone, much less text messaging.
There is so little love for one’s fellow man already in our so-called modern society. Isn’t it ridiculous to get on the hate train about how other people LOVE one another? Especially when there are so many better things to get your knickers in a twist over.
But then again, I forget that getting upset about politics or war or the economy generally requires one to be informed. Getting mad about whether gay people should have the right to marry only requires an opinion.
GuntotingLiberal said, 11 months ago
Besides, I haven’t seen a gay man so lacking in fashion sense as to wear a shirt like that anyway.
DigitalFrog
said,
11 months ago
What do you call 50 lawyers jumping from a plane?
.
Skeet :)
cleokaya
said,
11 months ago
I think his mother bought him that sweater and he’s awaiting her arrival. Otherwise, I can’t think of any reason anyone would wear something so hideous.
Wildmustang1262 said, 11 months ago
It is up to people who want to be involved in the same sex marriage so that’s their problems, not mine. I just back off and make a neutral. :-)
plus4 said, 11 months ago
For so many people, an given issue only matters in terms of what it does for them. That’s what’s great about today’s cartoon, regardless of what else you think about the issue at hand.
plus4 said, 11 months ago
Calvin (as in “and Hobbes”) once said something to the effect of this: “If something can’t be explained in 10 seconds, it’s not worth knowing.”
Unfortunately that’s how many people (on both sides) approach complex issues like those involving gays. They only want to know what can be understood without much thinking – and of course, they can’t get anything like an accurate understanding that way.
“Isn’t it ridiculous to get on the hate train about how other people LOVE one another?”
I’m sorry, but if that sums up the extent of your understanding of the position of those you disagree with, then you pretty much waive your right to an opinion on the matter. (To be fair, I’d say the same to someone who disagrees with you but shows a similar comprehension level regarding the issue.)
circuit7 said, 11 months ago
I think it’s time for me to go to law school.
And I will avoid jumping from planes.
Brian Chapman said, 11 months ago
Man…I should have been a lawyer…Mom was right!!!
westiewest Great-gra... said, 11 months ago
The sweater reminds me of the sweaters Bill Cosby would wear on the Cosby Show!
weasel_monkey said, 11 months ago
I’m sorry plus4 but it IS as simple as two people loving each other. In an age where many men and women get married and choose not to have children; where poorer people marry into wealth for purely financial reasons; where immigration is circumvented with a marriage of convenience; what possible reason could there be to deny same sex couples the right to officially recognise their relationship in the eyes of the community and the law? And if you sight religion as a reason I’ll scream. Religion has been at the root of much of the worlds intolerance, bigotry and violence. It has a nice message at it’s core but the implementation has been twisted by politics and egos.
…and sometimes a sweater is just a sweater.
GuntotingLiberal said, 11 months ago
Dear Plus4: Before you attempt to use your wit to cut someone to ribbons, perhaps you’d better make sure that you’re equipped with more than a proverbial butter knife in the fight.
Unfortunately for you, my previous comment does not more or less sum up my “understanding of the issue.” I could argue, depending on where you’re living, your general orientation, and your sources of information, that I am far more educated on the subject than you can even imagine.
But this is not the forum for those sorts of proverbial wall-peeing contests, and in any event my point that I think the general debate over the whole issue is a waste of time when there are more important things to worry about still stands.
Your arrogance in talking about how people should be deprived of an opinion on an issue strictly based on what your perception of their stance is is amusing and ironic.
ds133
said,
5 months ago
Okay, is it just me, or does the guy in the sweater look like an easter egg?