Nonsequitur_board_header_600x120

Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller

?fh=a17f7978fe3701b647243aa01c52794e

Comments (10) Jump to Comments Form

  1. AZPrairiedog

    AZPrairiedog said, about 1 year ago

    I truly do enjoy this strip…if only Wiley wasn’t such a flaming left-wing liberal…sigh. On the bright side, I see that Paul Newman kicked the bucket…now if only we could get Alec Baldwin to take the hint & drop dead too!!!

  2. stpatme

    stpatme said, about 1 year ago

    Why don’t you set an example for him, jerk!!!

  3. Wiley

    WileyGenius_badge said, about 1 year ago

    lib·er·al   
    adj.
    1. a. Not limited to or by established, traditional, orthodox, or authoritarian attitudes, views, or dogmas; free from bigotry.
    b. Favoring proposals for reform, open to new ideas for progress, and tolerant of the ideas and behavior of others; broad-minded.

    Can you explain to me why you see anyone being called a “liberal” is bad thing?

  4. robertolopez144

    robertolopez144 said, about 1 year ago

    liberal is not a definition but an idea, one with which some people are prone to have excess to(in case you don’t get it, that means you) !!

  5. robertolopez144

    robertolopez144 said, about 1 year ago

    Oh, and leave Alec Baldwin alone-No one dies for the Righteous- and also includes you All Of You

  6. Wiley

    WileyGenius_badge said, about 1 year ago

    “liberal is not a definition but an idea…”

    Since I just provided the dictionary definition for you, that proves you’re wrong. You are entitled to your own opinion, but you are not entitled to your own facts.

  7. DigitalFrog

    DigitalFrogGenius_badge said, about 1 year ago

    Actually, you provided the definition for a liberal, AZ was specifically referring to a “flaming left-wing liberal” which unfortunately is miles away from your idealistic defiinition. That being said, I don’t think Wiley or the strip are that far out in left field. I lean to the right and still enjoy them.

  8. auricle

    auricle said, about 1 year ago

    Heh, heh, “Dirtnap Acres”. Excellent.

  9. lalas

    lalas said, about 1 year ago

    Wow AZPD – I bet you’re the same douchebag that thinks liberals are ‘happy’ when our soldiers die in Iraq because it helps prove W is an idiot. Or that we were sad when nobody died in hurricane Ike because we couldn’t slam Bush for it.

    Really shows how pathetic of a human being you must be.

  10. tobybartels

    tobybartels said, about 1 year ago

    Roberto Lopez wrote in part:


    liberal is not a definition but an idea,


    Then Wiley Miller replied in part:


    Since I just provided the dictionary definition for you, that proves you’re wrong.


    This is what philosophers call a ‘category error’. Liberalism is an idea (or more properly, an ideology, that is a coherent system of ideas about some domain, in this case politics), and Wiley gave a definition of that ideology (or more properly, of the adjective ‘liberal’ that describes a follower of that ideology).

    (I have to write everything properly, or some other would-be philosopher will jump on me! ^_^ And I hope that I don't have to explain that ‘ideology’ is not a naughty word either.)

    Without disagreeing with Wiley (in that being called a ‘liberal’ is not a bad thing), Roberto has a point: that whatever the definition of a word may be, the property that it describes could be taken to excess. (But I also agree with DigitalFrog that Wiley is hardly a liberal to excess, so I'm not sure where Roberto is going with his point.)

    Full disclosure: I'm a flaming left-wing anarchist; I usually don't call myself ‘liberal’, since that's easily misunderstood and not as descriptive as other words, although I do fit the definition that Wiley gave.