Non Sequitur by Wiley Miller
- August 10, 2008
- From Beginning
- Previous feature
- Show Calendar
- Next feature
- Current
Comics A-Z Navigation
New Adventures of Queen Victoria by Pab Sungenis
The Norm by Michael Jantze
About Non Sequitur
Collectible Prints are always available for all editions. Original art is available on a first-come, first-served basis. Just contact Wiley Miller for either.
Information on Non Sequitur original art:Upon availability, the original art sells for $350 for a daily edition, and $450 for a Sunday edition.
All original art, including most Sunday editions, are in black & white line art (color in newspapers is done in a separate process).
Prints are available (black and white only) for any edition of Non Sequitur for $75 each.
Most Sunday editions are available in color prints for $150 each.
All prints are on high quality, 11" x 14" cardstock, suitable for framing.
If you would like to have either a print or original personally inscribed, please include a note indicating who it is to inscribed for. Otherwise, the work will NOT be signed.
About Non Sequitur
Non Sequitur is Wiley Miller’s wry look at the absurdities of everyday life. A hit with fans of all ages, the strip is syndicated in more than 700 newspapers. Non Sequitur has received four National Cartoonists Society divisional awards, the most prestigious in cartooning. It is the only comic strip to win the coveted award in its first year of syndication and the only one to ever win in both the best comic strip and best comic panel categories.This hilarious creation is not only creative but also clever. It tackles current cultural issues such as politics, celebrities, male-female relations, materialistic desires and society’s obsession with weight. Non Sequitur will have you laughing at the controversy of everyday life.
© 2009 Universal Press Syndicate - All Rights Reserved.
Comments (2) Jump to Comments Form
aerwalt
said,
about 1 year ago
I prefer;
“fe-fi-fo-fat…I tawt I taw A putty tat !”
geeknerd said, about 1 year ago
How PC is calling him an Englishman? Shouldn’t that be “Person of the United Kingdom”?