Nick Anderson by Nick Anderson

Nick Anderson

Comments (39) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. ConserveGov

    ConserveGov said, 10 months ago

    Funny how all these lefty cartoonist seem to “forget” their team controls the Senate and the White House who refuse to negotiate on anything.

  2. Rad-ish

    Rad-ish GoComics PRO Member said, 10 months ago

    He wants to be free to disobey any law he disagrees with.

  3. NoMo'ol'tomcats

    NoMo'ol'tomcats GoComics PRO Member said, 10 months ago

    Koch’s Minions are ever so full of freedumb.

  4. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, 10 months ago

    So making someone buy a product or pay a fine is NOT tieing up a persons income? Just saying it is Obama don’t care that is the locks and the Tea party have the keys.

  5. vwdualnomand

    vwdualnomand said, 10 months ago

    this is nuts….syria even if their strife and problems are still paying the bills and workers’ wages. but, we can’t because the gop has no control over their party, and their media arm will not even entertain the idea of being wrong.

  6. Gregg Hazen

    Gregg Hazen GoComics PRO Member said, 10 months ago

    “About Nick Anderson
    Nick Anderson of the Houston Chronicle is an avowed independent”

    Independent? Looking at the volume of his work he is almost as far left as they come.

    It just goes to show you how blinded they are in their ridged ideology.

  7. Robert Landers

    Robert Landers said, 10 months ago

    @Harleyquinn

    Do the people in your state have to buy auto insurance in order to drive on the highways of your state? They do in mine, and nobody seems to be complaining here about that lack of freedom!!

  8. sw10mm

    sw10mm said, 10 months ago

    Being a ‘pro’ gives you the right to start name calling again? Moderators don’t seem to notice.

  9. ossiningaling

    ossiningaling said, 10 months ago

    Funny how rightie commentors forget that the House proposed an all Republican budget and wants to add defunding of a constitutionally tested law as part of their “negotiation.”

  10. Enoki

    Enoki said, 10 months ago

    @ConserveGov

    Pretty much… But then the Left pretty much has a one track mind and this time it leads straight to a huge train wreck….

  11. mikefive

    mikefive said, 10 months ago

    “yeah there are only 30 of us”


    Just being nit picky here, David, but if you’re talking tea party caucus types, there are 49.

  12. pirate227

    pirate227 said, 10 months ago

    The freedom to throw a temper tantrum when you cant’ have your way after losing the vote (it became a law), the election (Obama was reelected), and the court case (despite GOP lies, it is Constitutional).

  13. Dogday88

    Dogday88 GoComics PRO Member said, 10 months ago

    @Robert Landers

    First, I don’t have to pay for auto insurance if I don’t have a car or a license. If ACA applied to drivers, I would. (The argument that driving doesn’t strike like illness is another issue.) Second, here in Illinois we actually got something right: you can be a self-insured driver (you have to be able to prove it) and you don’t get fined if you don’t buy insurance. Third, I am no scholar on these matters, but no other scenario comes to mind wherein citizens are required to pay for something that directly enriches private businesses; must then also pay fees and costs to those corporations; and then are taxed by the government if they opt out. I think it is obscene that we have the ability to save lives but are prevented by monetary concerns. But I also am not willing to roll over for such an ill-conceived solution as the ACA. The constant focus on self by the “I…I…I” president who rammed this through doesn’t help.

  14. midaswelby

    midaswelby said, 10 months ago

    @Robert Landers

    Robert, are you comparing the right to live with the privilege of driving? If they were somehow equivalent, you’d need to pass a written test and a skills test before leaving your parents home, and your license to live could easily be revoked for any combination of minor offenses. Is that how you think it should be?
    Don’t like that analogy? OK, you decide for the rest of us just how much government intrusion we must endure. No matter how much, it will soon be exceeded. That’s the nature of government.
    It is not just the right, but the duty of free people to deny any attempt at restricting our freedom. One day they may come for a freedom you hold dear. If that happens, you will not feel the same.

  15. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, 10 months ago

    I agree with much of what you say. However, I think it is unfair to blame “those people” for taking away your money. While I recognize that there are way too many free-loading individuals in our society, we must also recognize that corporate welfare creates at least as much waste, and certainly more income inequality, than welfare cheats.

    Tens of billions to oil companies in subsidies, allowing agribusiness to have their cows graze on federal land for far less cost than smaller farms must spend, building tanks that no one wants, just to buy votes from a firm that is based in Ohio….all of these and more create a heavy burden on the economy. Blaming only poor people ignores a large portion of the problem.

    Both sides have their “takers” lining up at the trough. Both sides protect their takers. So, I will paraphrase: I think Harry Reid, Obama, Mitch McConnell, Nancy Pelosi, and their cadre of takers need to come to the table with some concessions or we are headed for a global recession.

    I’m glad we are both prepared, because I do not see any one of them being willing to do anything different.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (24).