Nick Anderson by Nick Anderson

Nick Anderson

Comments (29) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, about 3 years ago

    “Bubble boy” still not exposed to germs, or the germ of a thoought?

  2. sw10mm

    sw10mm said, about 3 years ago

    Neither one of you read for yourselves. Radish, you should just change your name to parrot. Everything you’ve written is denied by the ‘scientists’ you have your faith in.

  3. Jase99

    Jase99 GoComics PRO Member said, about 3 years ago

    @sw10mm

    “Everything you’ve written is denied by the ‘scientists’ you have your faith in.”

    Which specific scientist is denying which specific statement in Radish’s comment?

  4. avarner

    avarner said, about 3 years ago

    In the real world, Chakra Al Gore is enjoying his new multi-million $$ beach house..

    He doesn’t seem to be too concerned about the sea rising.

  5. Nancy

    Nancy GoComics PRO Member said, about 3 years ago

    perfect response Jeff!
    Thanks!

  6. motivemagus

    motivemagus said, about 3 years ago

    This is not about “tolerance” of other views. It’s about facts. Global warming is a fact. Human contribution is a fact. What the science actually says is that it is 95% certain — which is generally accepted by the scientific community — that there is significant global warming primarily caused by human beings. (The acceptance of global warming itself is higher still.)
    There is no need to be “tolerant” of people who reject the facts. It’s like being tolerant of the Flat Earth Society.

  7. motivemagus

    motivemagus said, about 3 years ago

    Ah, yes, the idiot graph again. That percentage of alcohol in your blood would significantly change YOUR behavior and ability to drive. That percentage of arsenic in your system would kill you.
    Quit posting this! It doesn’t mean anything. Or I can restate it for you: The percentage of CO2 is small, but its impact is so large that a meaningful increase will have major effects on the climate.
    And that is what has happened.

  8. motivemagus

    motivemagus said, about 3 years ago

    @sw10mm

    I am a scientist, as is dtroutma. We know what we are talking about. You don’t, or you wouldn’t have posted your comment. Over 97% of papers discussing climate agree that Anthropogenic Climate Change is happening. Who are your “scientists?” The most notable and credible denier — one funded by the oil barons the Koch brothers — has agreed based on his data that AGW is happening!

  9. Stipple

    Stipple said, about 3 years ago

    Going out on a limb to piss off the folks that understand science.
    Use the same reasoning just a little, “denier”, what part of that word confuses you?
    By definition they will not acknowledge facts, but instead deny them.
    .
    How many times? How many studies? How much history?
    .
    Give it up as wasted bandwidth, most of them are merely posturing anyway. Nobody that can read is really that ignorant, it is deliberate, and they certainly are effective at upsetting those who care.

  10. lonecat

    lonecat said, about 3 years ago

    onguard asks “Are there any Dem Libs posting here that are not Doctors or Scientists?” Are there any conservatives posting here who are doctors or scientists?

  11. Enoki

    Enoki said, about 3 years ago

    The IPCC, the leading advocate of Gorebal Warming has been wrong on virtually every prediction it has made. But, what else should one expect from the UN, that gentleman’s debating society that has produced nothing of real value in its entire history.

    Then there’s the the cult leader himself, Al Gore. He produced a book of drivel and a mediocre move that wanted us to believe that ancedote and story telling equal scientific proof.

    Three alternatives to Gorebal Warming:

    Changing albedo of the Earth
    Increased water vapor in the atmosphere in large part due to contrails.
    Decreased particulates in the atmosphere due to a global reduction in air pollution.

    All three can be demonstarted to have far greater effect on climate than a miniscule change in CO2 content in the atmosphere.

  12. ConserveGov

    ConserveGov said, about 3 years ago

    HOUSE #1 is outside of Nashville , Tennessee ; it is the abode of the “environmentalist” Al Gore;
    HOUSE #2 is on a ranch near Crawford, Texas ; it is the residence the of the President of the United States , George W. Bush.
    An “inconvenient truth.”

    GREAT STUFF!

  13. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, about 3 years ago

    On "belief/faith without accurate facts, versus science based on fact: IF I go goose hunting, the theory and data reveal that if I use 00 buckshot and shoot at a goose, there is a probability, based on skill levels, that I may, or will actually shoot a goose, but still might miss. If I take that same shotgun with 00 buckshot, stick it in my mouth, and pull the trigger, it WILL basically blow my head off.


    Deniers believe misrepresented “facts”, or outright lies, to say climate change isn’t happening, or isn’t human caused. Even the latest report does give the “scientific” benefit of the doubt there’s a whole 5% chance humans aren’t the ENTIRE cause of global warming, but still doesn’t absolve them of the majority of “blame”. This “deniers” grab on to to claim that 5% margin of error is the only “truth”.


    Ernest Hemingway DID prove the facts of shotgun “science”. Yes, that WAS a “theory”, and DID HAVE “proofs”, which is where in science, hypothesis becomes either theory, or “rule”.


    And yes, I guess three degrees and over 30 years of experience in the field working on “science” research would classify me as a “scientist” of sorts. Having over time read books, research papers, and other documents from other fields, like engineering, as well as talking to people with other expertise over 5 or so decades, equivalent to several additional degree programs in other fields, might give credence to thoughts and convictions on those other “subjects”.


    Of course, those who listen to Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity, or other “pundits” obviously have a higher degree of education with regard to “facts”. Right….

  14. ThePupUnbound!

    ThePupUnbound! said, about 3 years ago

    …and “climate change” believers ? Well at least they believe in something that is GUARANTEED to happen…

  15. lonecat

    lonecat said, about 3 years ago

    Well, I’m not a scientist, so I don’t post my opinions about climate change. But I do read the links that other people post, and I find that those posted by the liberal/science crowd are much more detailed and comprehensive than the links provided by the deniers, which often are just newspaper articles. As for attacks on Al Gore, those are simply irrelevant and silly. Those who post them are motivated by personal animosity rather than an interest in answering the real questions.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (14).