In the run-up to the Iraq invasion and the killing of hundreds of thousands of innocent people to find non-existent WMDs, the message was you don’t criticize your president in his job as commander in chief, and to do so is traitorous. Why have the rules changed? Except now the commander in chief is seeking to enforce International law for the actual use of WMDs, and he gets non-stop derision and under-mining. Furthermore, progress is being made without any loss of life. I don’t get it.
In the run-up to the Iraq invasion and the killing of hundreds of thousands of innocent people to find non-existent WMDs, the message was you don’t criticize your president in his job as commander in chief, and to do so is traitorous. Why have the rules changed? Except now the commander in chief is seeking to enforce International law for the actual use of WMDs, and he gets non-stop derision and under-mining. Furthermore, progress is being made without any loss of life. I don’t get it.