Nick Anderson by Nick Anderson

Nick Anderson

Recommended

Comments (42) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. ConserveGov

    ConserveGov said, 6 months ago

    All The Presidents Women are bailing on him. Can’t blame them.

  2. saywhatwhat

    saywhatwhat said, 6 months ago

    Nick may be exaggerating a little bit.
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2012/12/20/two-words-missing-from-benghazi-report/

  3. Tigger

    Tigger said, 6 months ago

    @saywhatwhat

    How so? NBC News has Clinton taking Responsibility for Benghazi

  4. Rx71Wm29

    Rx71Wm29 said, 6 months ago

    So much for a 2016 run for POTUS!

  5. zoidknight

    zoidknight said, 6 months ago

    @saywhatwhat

    Not really, since she is the one who insisted that US Marines no longer guard our embassies, and the ones there to not have any ammo.

  6. Ms. Ima

    Ms. Ima said, 6 months ago

    Come on guys, she has a sniffy nose and feels sick.

  7. ODon

    ODon said, 6 months ago

    @zoidknight

    What you state and the truth are in disagreement, nothing new.

  8. Libertarian1

    Libertarian1 said, 6 months ago

    The report also justifies the criticism of Susan Rice. Five times she went on TV and said the entire attack was a spontaneous outpouring of hatred because of the video. We know for certain that was untrue. The fact that it occurred exactly on 9/11 was coincidental.

    She either knew the truth and lied (my belief) or the ultimate inside brilliant Obama crony did not know what was happening. Either way she should not be SOS.

  9. ODon

    ODon said, 6 months ago

    Hillary has bigger b*lls then most of the above posters.

  10. onguard

    onguard said, 6 months ago

    Hillary knows where the Tall Grass is, Bill showed her…….She only needs to avoid the Main Stream Media there are in there too.

  11. TheTrustedMechanic

    TheTrustedMechanic said, 6 months ago

    @Ms. Ima

    She is under a doctor’s supervision and was advised to “take it easy.” Granted there is probably a certain level of collusion to help her avoid the high profile of a congressional hearing. But she is still scheduled to appear. If she says anything you can be guaranteed that the republicans will either twist it and take it out of context or flat out lie to make it seem she said something she did not. And If she says anything they agree with they will either ignore it because it does not fit their wanted narrative, or faux “news” and limbo will rant on and on about it for weeks. Let us not forget that this witch hunt is nothing more than a political grand-standing measure to try and make the sheople think the reDUMBlicans care. In fact they don’t but they have to put on a good show to even have any chance of remaining relevant. This reminds me of the little lizard, while he himself was playing around on his wife, unrelenting in his quest to try and destroy President Clinton by pushing what really was a non-issue. If the little lizard hadn’t pushed the issue so hard, the President would not have lied under oath. Which when considering that was the only reason he was impeached demonstrates how serious his forays with the intern really were, not very except to make political brownie points for the reDUMBlicans.

  12. ossiningaling

    ossiningaling said, 6 months ago

    @Libertarian1

    Same crap that Condi handed out. So why was she SOS? McCain and Graham only went after Susan Rice so that Kerry would get the SOS nom and Brown could run again for the Senate

  13. Libertarian1

    Libertarian1 said, 6 months ago

    @ossiningaling

    What lies did Condi tell before she was SOS?

    I think the reason Rice was opposed was multi-fold.
    A) to deeply embarrass Obama (it succeeded)
    B) open up the seat
    C) she openly lied and the independent report proved it

    Don’t you think there should be consequences for lying? Who was she trying to fool? The terrorists knew the facts. She lied to the American people. She didn’t want to say anything that could possibly harm Obama’s re-election.

  14. corzak

    corzak said, 6 months ago

    @Libertarian1

    “What lies did Condi tell before she was SOS?”

    Really? Do you people really want to revisit the entire Iraq debacle again?

    Here’s from one hearing of many: “Secretary Rice falsely stated that she never saw intelligence casting doubt on the Bush Administration claims that Saddam possessed weapons of mass destruction. This unbelievable statement is flatly contradicted by numerous government reports and CIA testimonials.”

    http://youtu.be/qyKOkGjodhY

  15. Bruce4671

    Bruce4671 said, 6 months ago

    You are looking for a politician to take responsibility? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA……….(sigh)

  16. Load the rest of the comments (27).