Nick Anderson by Nick Anderson

Nick Anderson

Comments (28) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. ConserveGov

    ConserveGov said, over 3 years ago

    All The Presidents Women are bailing on him. Can’t blame them.

  2. saywhatwhat

    saywhatwhat said, over 3 years ago

    Nick may be exaggerating a little bit.
    http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2012/12/20/two-words-missing-from-benghazi-report/

  3. Rx71Wm29

    Rx71Wm29 GoComics PRO Member said, over 3 years ago

    So much for a 2016 run for POTUS!

  4. zoidknight

    zoidknight said, over 3 years ago

    @saywhatwhat

    Not really, since she is the one who insisted that US Marines no longer guard our embassies, and the ones there to not have any ammo.

  5. ODon

    ODon said, over 3 years ago

    @zoidknight

    What you state and the truth are in disagreement, nothing new.

  6. Libertarian1

    Libertarian1 said, over 3 years ago

    The report also justifies the criticism of Susan Rice. Five times she went on TV and said the entire attack was a spontaneous outpouring of hatred because of the video. We know for certain that was untrue. The fact that it occurred exactly on 9/11 was coincidental.

    She either knew the truth and lied (my belief) or the ultimate inside brilliant Obama crony did not know what was happening. Either way she should not be SOS.

  7. ODon

    ODon said, over 3 years ago

    Hillary has bigger b*lls then most of the above posters.

  8. ossiningaling

    ossiningaling said, over 3 years ago

    @Libertarian1

    Same crap that Condi handed out. So why was she SOS? McCain and Graham only went after Susan Rice so that Kerry would get the SOS nom and Brown could run again for the Senate

  9. Libertarian1

    Libertarian1 said, over 3 years ago

    @ossiningaling

    What lies did Condi tell before she was SOS?

    I think the reason Rice was opposed was multi-fold.
    A) to deeply embarrass Obama (it succeeded)
    B) open up the seat
    C) she openly lied and the independent report proved it

    Don’t you think there should be consequences for lying? Who was she trying to fool? The terrorists knew the facts. She lied to the American people. She didn’t want to say anything that could possibly harm Obama’s re-election.

  10. corzak

    corzak said, over 3 years ago

    @Libertarian1

    “What lies did Condi tell before she was SOS?”

    Really? Do you people really want to revisit the entire Iraq debacle again?

    Here’s from one hearing of many: “Secretary Rice falsely stated that she never saw intelligence casting doubt on the Bush Administration claims that Saddam possessed weapons of mass destruction. This unbelievable statement is flatly contradicted by numerous government reports and CIA testimonials.”

    http://youtu.be/qyKOkGjodhY

  11. Bruce4671

    Bruce4671 said, over 3 years ago

    You are looking for a politician to take responsibility? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA……….(sigh)

  12. josefw

    josefw said, over 3 years ago

    The “Convenient Concussion!”


    Sure would be a shame if the truth was ever got out. “THE TRUTH!?!? DEMOCRAT’S CAN’T HANDLE THE TRUTH!”


    thanks Jack.

  13. Ransom D Stone

    Ransom D Stone said, over 3 years ago

    Thanks! Until your post it was all Troll talk.

  14. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, over 3 years ago

    Hmm, and when will Condoleezza Rice, and “W” take direct responsibility for the civilian contractors killed in Fallujah and hung from a bridge?? Right, non-existent WMDs don’t count, thousands dead don’t matter, because it’s evil and short-sighted to “blame Bush”.

  15. Robert Landers

    Robert Landers said, over 3 years ago

    Good Grief, the world must actually be ending, here Ima is being kind to a Democrat!!

  16. Load the rest of the comments (13).