Comments (17) (Please sign in to comment)

1. 

   legaleagle48 said, 4 months ago

   Cheer up, Venus. I love you, you love you, and we love you, even if he, she, and they don’t love you! How’s that for a verb conjugation? :)
2. 

   Nabuquduriuzhur said, 4 months ago

   Psychobear is happy today.
3. 

   Sisyphos said, 4 months ago

   Cheer up, Venus! Bi-polar Bear loves you. We love you. And I’ll bet even Justin loves you!
4. 

   Night-Gaunt49 said, 4 months ago

   @legaleagle48

   Venus helps us to conjugate alight.
5. 

   Stephen Gilberg said, 4 months ago

   This punchline is too good for the “Love Is…” comic.
6. 

   scsurfer said, 4 months ago

   Poor Venus, that’s what happens when you pin your dreams to chance. Gamblers know the feeling well.
7. 

   The Life I Draw Upon said, 4 months ago

   Always count the petals first.
8. 

   mythtickle said, 4 months ago

   Yes, I do love her.
   But she’s not easy to draw.
   :)
9. 

   bmonk said, 4 months ago

   amo, amas, amat, amamus, amatis, amant.

   amabo, amabas, amabat . . .
10. 

    ujean said, 4 months ago

    @mythtickle

    But she’s so incredibly cute. Even when she’s frowning and feeling blue.
11. 

    Alain Harper (מיכאל בן-אברם) said, 4 months ago

    @mythtickle

    Pardon my Jung-speak, but I’d be willing to bet that no ENFP-preferenced character ever is. :D
12. 

    Alain Harper (מיכאל בן-אברם) said, 4 months ago

    @bmonk

    Excellent! Now don’t tempt me to exercise my Hebrew conjugation of *ahav and rename her Ashtoreth.
13. 

    legaleagle48 said, 4 months ago

    @bmonk

    Very good; in fact, you beat me to it! :) However, you’ve conflated the Latin Imperfect and the Future (which is, incidentally, exactly what happened when Latin became Italian). The correct conjugation of amare in those tenses is: amabam, amabas, amabat, amabamus, amabatis, amabant (Imperfect); amabo, amabis, amabit, amabimus, amabitis, amabunt (Future). In Italian, it became amavo, amavi, amava, amavamo, amavate, amavano (Imperfect only).
14. 

    Night-Gaunt49 said, 4 months ago

    @legaleagle48

    Very informative but do you have anything to say about today’s comic?
15. 

    JusSayin said, 3 months ago

    @Alain Harper (מיכאל בן-אברם)

    Jon-boy, we have bee through this before. Myers-Briggs is not Jungian, two housewives came up with those categorisations because they misunderstood Jung’s introduction to typology. Jung is still laughing at your lack of understanding and Myers and Briggs leaving out important parts of the enneagram.
    
    Venus CANNOT be one of those boxes you try to put her in because she is an ARCHETYPE, not a kind of type.
    
    And many languages predated Hebrew. Phoenician is a better source for ahav to become ashteroth, but there are three known cases where Aramaic ahava declines to astaroth.
16. Load the rest of the comments (2).