Comments (10) (Please sign in to comment)

1. 

   legaleagle48 said, 4 months ago

   Actually, that’s the Bible, not Shakespeare.
2. 

   Bruno Zeigerts said, 4 months ago

   But a Hollywood producer might not know that.
   I have a computer game called Galactic Battlegrounds … set in the Star Wars Universe … with scenes from the original three and the first two sequels.
   Oddly enough, the original effects …the ships, etc, seemed more realistic!
3. 

   Alain Harper (מיכאל בן-אברם) said, 4 months ago

   @Bruno Zeigerts

   But a Hollywood producer might not know that.
   
   And I suspect that’s Justin’s point, too. :)
4. 

   Sisyphos said, 4 months ago

   Bang-Zoom bang! Stunt Bee needs a good labor relations lawyer to take that dude down a few notches….
5. 

   Nabuquduriuzhur said, 4 months ago

   A lot of the CGI doesn’t look real. The models used in 70s and 80s movies generally looked more realistic.
6. 

   jason thompson said, 4 months ago

   Once again, thanks for my laugh for the day. The CEO of Bang-Zoom Pictures looks like he’s in need of a little bit of rest, but he looks exactly what I would picture a Hollywood talent agent to look like.

   @Gweedo Murray…I too love the Hollywood sign through the window. It’s those little, or not so little, details that make Mythtickle so very interesting.

   Great work big brother ;:^)
7. 

   capndunzzl said, 4 months ago

   …that 3rd panel makes a lot of sense.
8. 

   Stephen Gilberg said, 4 months ago

   If you think CG animals will never look real, watch “Life of Pi.”
9. 

   Coyoty said, 4 months ago

   He could do cereal commercials.
10. 

    Night-Gaunt49 said, 4 months ago

    @Nabuquduriuzhur

    There is so much CGI you don’t notice in movies. It is that real. Putting things in and taking things out. Oh the effects look better than ever..
11. Refresh Comments.