Mike Luckovich by Mike Luckovich

Mike Luckovich

Comments (29) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Enoki

    Enoki said, over 2 years ago

    Siblings are not a lifestyle choice. Gay marriage is.

  2. Enoki

    Enoki said, over 2 years ago

    More like caving into the intolerance of the Progressive Left.

  3. mikefive

    mikefive said, over 2 years ago

    Arizona’s SB 1062 is written in such a manner that it should be found unconstitutional just on the basis of it’s lack of clarity.

  4. magicwalnut

    magicwalnut GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    When I was on a high school senior trip in 1958, two bus loads of kids descended on a Hot shoppe in Virginia. The first bus load had already ordered when the second bus arrived, bearing…gasp!….a Negro! “We don’t serve that kind here”… quoth the manager. I’m proud to say that both bus loads of kids quietly rose from their seats and filed out the door, without any prompting from the chaperones. My first protest march! Sounds like it’s time to gather some folks together and do this again!

  5. wmconelly

    wmconelly said, over 2 years ago

    Are we brothers and sisters, the lot of us, or what? Separate herds with Rush and Fox Noise the cattle drovers? Questions, questions?

  6. vwdualnomand

    vwdualnomand said, over 2 years ago

    so, conservatives love religion and money. they can’t have 2 masters.

  7. Stipple

    Stipple said, over 2 years ago

    @wmconelly

    “If all men were brothers would you let one marry your sister?”

    Theodore Sturgeon

  8. goweeder

    goweeder said, over 2 years ago

    @Enoki

    “Siblings are not a lifestyle choice. Gay marriage is.”
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Heterosexual marriage is a lifestyle choice, too.
    I assume you want to deny ‘choice’ to people who do not think like you do.
    I don’t have a dog in this fight - I am straight (what difference does it make?)
    .
    I have a very simple philosophy -
    Live and Let Live. Try it sometime.

  9. goweeder

    goweeder said, over 2 years ago

    @Enoki

    “More like caving into the intolerance of the Progressive Left.”
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    .
    Wow! Have you got your wires crossed!
    I’d rather be a Progressive Dem than a Regressive Repub. (and check the definition of ‘intolerance.’)

  10. goweeder

    goweeder said, over 2 years ago

    @magicwalnut

    “…..chaperones. My first protest march! Sounds like it’s time to gather some folks together and do this again!”

    “…..chaperones. My first protest march! Sounds like it’s time to gather some folks together and do this again!”
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Let me know the time and place — I’ll be there!

  11. Cripplious

    Cripplious said, over 2 years ago

    This is the second such bill which she vetoed also

  12. bueller

    bueller said, over 2 years ago

    Actually it’s the proposed Arizona law that’s
    strange . Okay, setting aside the aspect of
    the Human Condition that we seem to need
    to have some group to discriminate against -
    how would this law be enforced? wouldn’t it
    simply open the door ( see above, Human
    Condition, etc. ) for a lot of ridiculous profiling? A scenario exactly like the cartoon
    portrays could happen. Business owners
    claim the right to refuse service, but some
    aren’t above harboring petty prejudices.
    Been there, seen it happen.

  13. hippogriff

    hippogriff said, over 2 years ago

    Never mind “how does your marriage suffer because someone else gets married too?” How does your religion suffer because you can’t use the law to force your cultic quirks against other peoples’ religions. The first clause of the Bill of Rights prohibits an establishment of religion, and just to make sure the “states rights” anti-Americans don’t say states can do it, Section 1 of the 14th amendment says it applies to the states too.

  14. echoraven

    echoraven said, over 2 years ago

    @vwdualnomand

    …and the left love and worship their anointed.

  15. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, over 2 years ago

    Oh, to be an attorney licensed in Arizona….a veritable cornucopia of riches if this bill is signed into law. Between anti-discrimination lawsuits going all the way to the SCOTUS, and lots of “I’ll sue because you thought I was gay” lawsuits, this is another example of a law that we all know will be struck down. The only questions are how long it will take, and how many attorneys will gain how much in the process.

    It was so nice to see the end of “whites only” signs in business establishments. Now, 50 years later, legal discrimination is coming back (everything old is new again).

    Bigotry in the name of religion is still bigotry.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (14).