Mike Lester by Mike Lester

Mike Lester

Comments (17) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Peabody-Martini

    Peabody-Martini said, over 1 year ago

    After this weeks nothingburger in Congress the media, particularly fox news, continues to push this story in the absence of any actual evidence backing up the spurious allegations. We even saw republican members of Congress attempt to correct the testimony of their own whistleblowers.

  2. Peabody-Martini

    Peabody-Martini said, over 1 year ago

    Incorrect, the media didn’t cover the break in at the Watergate. In that case the evidence led to the investigation by the media. Here it’s working backwards, we have media, again largely fox, deciding that there must be a scandal and trying to make it appear so through repetition.

  3. Chillbilly

    Chillbilly said, over 1 year ago

    Jeez, I avoid the popstream news and still see the word “Benghazi” at least 300 times every day.

  4. dannysixpack

    dannysixpack said, over 1 year ago

    time for all the republican revisionists to come out and claim Watergate was about the media. wrong. President Nixon ordered the breakin, then ordered the coverup. the first a crime, the second a crime to coverup the first crime.

    in bill Clintons impeachment the alleged crime was lying under oath (something the republicans seem to like in republicans – along with marital infidelity, but find intolerable in democrats).

    in the case of benghzai, there is NO crime. lying and covering up a non-criminal incident, is not a crime. but the republicans are hoping that like the birthers et al…. that this time the distinction will be lost on the public.

    I suggest anyone who comments on this watch the hearings on cspan. in case you don’t know, cspan is a protector of our democracy by having non-editorial cameras rolling during the hearings, no commercials, no commentators, just raw original source feed, where you can observe for yourself and listen to the testimony.

    btw, Watergate wasn’t a witch hunt, because there were crimes committed.

  5. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago


    Tigger said, about 1 hour ago
    There was evidence.. 18 minute gap in tape which had been erased.
    And Obama has a whole night gap. Where in wich Stand down orders where handed down from somewhere.

  6. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago


    Jeez, I avoid the popstream news and still see the word “Benghazi” at least 300 times every day…
    and before the election all I heard was the buzzword lie “spontaneous and YouTube”

  7. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    @Genome Project

    Genome Project said, 13 minutes ago
    You must only watch Fox News. A lot of us heard differently. Obama called it a terrorist attack the next morning. "
    No that was a moderator LIE. Obama said terrorism was a bad thing but he did not say Benghazi was terrorism even after Hillery said it was ten days later. Obama was sticking to the lie buzzwords “YouTube” and “Spontaneous”

  8. denis1112

    denis1112 said, over 1 year ago

    Because the leftwing news nerds don’t want to cover killing of a U.S. Ambassador and the men fighting the attackers.Some how there must be something wrong with FOX because they do want to cover it.
    Why is the CBS news woman who has been covering it being fired? Look up some foreign news sources and read about how they say the attackers claim they raped the ambassador before they killed him.A french news source reported it first.

  9. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago


    What possible difference does it make at this point what LABEL you put on it? The point is, four Americans were killed. Why do you keep ignoring that fact?

    what difference does it make? Obama is incompetent and this is part of the proof! The dumbmasses where LIED to and just took it and still are taking it. A “moderator” LIED for Obama in a debate! Do you really think Obama could have gotten elected or relected if the lame stream media was not in his back pocket? this is an example of just how far they will go to stick up for the guy. yes I do not think it will do anything from the past like bringthe guys back to life. But maybe if Obama tells the truth about radical Islamic factors wanting to KILL the USA then maybe we can prevent more from happening. I am NOT saying the boston bombing could have been prevented but don’t you find it disturbing that they used the same buzz words to play it down. They were self radicalized by YouTube and spontaneously decided to go to NY to do more harm.

  10. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    @Genome Project

    Don’t forget the guy who made the YouTube Video is still in jail. And so is the Doctor who helped us carry out the plan W put in place to get Bin Lauden

  11. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago


    Even Clinton said it was bangazi was an act of terrorism.. 10 days later, then Obama denied saying he needed more information.

  12. wmconelly

    wmconelly said, over 1 year ago

    “I’m still not getting the GOP point on this more-Bengazhi-everyday-Behgazhi-protest-of-the-day.
    “The GOP has unveiled Gregory Hicks, the No. 2 official at the American Embassy in Tripoli, who criticizes the failure to deploy military assets under the control of the Department of Defense — even though the Department of Defense has explained that the requested air resources were (1) too far away to arrive within a reasonable time, and (2) the necessary re-fueling resources to permit such a long flight were not available in any event. In addition, a criticism of the Department of Defense is not a criticism of The Department of State and Hick’s belief that a mere “show of air power” in Behgazhi skies would have driven away the attackers was surely speculative."
    Tip o’ the hat to Dallee Florida

  13. Stipple

    Stipple said, over 1 year ago

    You keep saying “what does it matter” out of context.
    I listened to her speaking, she said exactly the opposite of what you keep implying. I am guessing you listened as well, along with most posters here, so why are you being silly on this?

  14. cubefarmer

    cubefarmer said, over 1 year ago

    You can tell exactly what time a Dem, or their pet trolls for that matter, realise they’ve been caught lying: On cue they start ranting irrelevant hate fantasies about either FNC or Bush.

  15. lonecat

    lonecat said, over 1 year ago


    I guess Obama just kind of accidentally used the phrase “acts of terror” in a speech specifically about the Benghazi incident. I mean just because the whole speech was specifically about the incident, that doesn’t mean that he was talking about it or anything. It was a kind of random comment, like about the weather or something. No connection.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (2).