Michael Ramirez by Michael Ramirez

Michael Ramirez

Comments (42) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. sw10mm

    sw10mm said, 2 days ago

    Anyone on the left yelling traitor or treason at little o? No? Didn’t think you’d have a spine either.

  2. tom

    tom GoComics PRO Member said, 2 days ago

    “says sw10mm about 1 hour ago: Anyone on the left yelling traitor or treason at little o? No? Didn’t think you’d have a spine either.”
    =
    Obama is neither a traitor nor treasonous; just incompetent and narcissistic.

  3. Observer fo Irony

    Observer fo Irony said, 2 days ago

    @tom

    Well he did promise to close Gitmo when he was first elected.

  4. logicalone

    logicalone said, 2 days ago

    It is hard to grasp the justification for this trade. Every reasonable explanation sounds crazy. We can’t have a president that actually hates his own country. Even if every day we see American-hating leftist on display in these pages spewing anti-American bile, it just can’t be that.


    I think we should have closed Gitmo (actually, never would have opened it, would have done it “over there” or sent them to regular prison’s where the inmates might do what they do to child molestors), but this is beyond reason.


    Spell it out for me lefty nut-jobs, please.

  5. Comicsfan222

    Comicsfan222 said, 1 day ago

    Logicalone: Whose logic? try this logic: Hypothesis One: A. Bergdahl is innocent until proven guilty. B. Bergdahl has not been tried yet, C. Being tried in the press is pretty stupid. D. People who support trying a person in the press must be pretty stupid. Hypothesis Two: A. The US Armed Forces are committed to leaving no one behind. B. Begdahl was left behind. C. Therefore Bdgdahl should be rescued. Hypothesis Three: A. Keeping people in Gitmo costs an aveerage of $2m each per year. B. Exchanging these men for Bergdahl saves $10 m per year, or $100m over a ten year period. C. This more than compensates for the cost of a Bergdahl trial. D. Having a Bergdahl trial will determine if he is guilty or innocent. Is that logic enough for you? I can go on.

  6. ODon

    ODon said, 1 day ago

    @Comicsfan222

    And let’s not forget that Obama did try to move the Gitmo group to stateside prisons but who stopped that…not “lefty-nut jobs”

  7. logicalone

    logicalone said, 1 day ago

    @Comicsfan222

    1. The military justice system is FAR superior to our civilian one. They would not have brought the charges without a preponderance of evidence. The men that had to risk their lived due to his actions have made it clear that he was a deserter.


    This “no man left behind” crap is just that. As a former Marine, I can tell you it does not apply to traitors or deserters. It is okay to shoot them whenever you find them.


    3. I said I was against Gitmo, so again, your poor intellect is showing. There will be a trial. He will go to prison (at least) and then you can petition for his sex change operation like manning.


    What kind of person defends traitors and cowards? I’ll be kind and just call you naive.

  8. logicalone

    logicalone said, 1 day ago

    @Comicsfan222

    Here is the truth in his own words. “I am sorry for everything,” he wrote. “The horror that is America is disgusting.”


    As an American, you have every right to think and express these views. As a soldier, you simply need to leave the service or take your complaints up the chain of command.

  9. WiseOrator

    WiseOrator said, 1 day ago

    @Comicsfan222

    STOP IT! Just STOP IT!
    You’re talking all crazy there using facts, logic and reality.
    Besides that you will never change the mind of someone who never makes it up for themselves. When your opponent has their ideas, opinions and verbal abuses provided to them by the Ministries of Faulty Information, you will never win with logic, reason, reality or facts.

  10. logicalone

    logicalone said, 1 day ago

    @WiseOrator

    Yes, stop pointing out that the president broke the law… as shown in this report from the Government Accounting Office

    http://www.gao.gov/products/B-326013#mt=e-report

  11. WiseOrator

    WiseOrator said, 1 day ago

    @logicalone

    “so again, your poor intellect is showing. "
    You do know that blatant personal attacks like you make regularly are supposed to get you banished, right?
    But since you appear immune to the same treatment as other “lesser” people I will simply point out that when someone has to resort to personal attacks like yours, the ONLY explanation is that the person doing the attacking has no valid or legitimate point to argue. So in desperation they attack and try to put the person with the more valid point on the defensive. I think it’s called misdirection/redirection.

  12. WiseOrator

    WiseOrator said, 1 day ago

    @logicalone

    “As a soldier, you simply need to leave the service”
    When your hitch is up, sure. But what about when you were promised a certain length of time but the Bush regime extended your “tour?” Granted this was during Obama’s tenure, but it just serves to prove your point is of very marginal validity.
    .
    “…or take your complaints up the chain of command.”
    My son is in the Army. You don’t “take it up the chain of command” because if you do, you suffer, you get punished and you wish you had deserted.
    .
    “This “no man left behind” crap is just that. I can tell you it does not apply to traitors or deserters. It is okay to shoot them whenever you find them.”
    So we can shoot the 47 Republicans on sight? Oh, wait, subverting the CONSTITUTIONAL actions of the President is not traitorous, it’s heroic because if a Republican does it, anything is okay. But as for Bergdahl, at the time no one knew he was a deserter. Do you know what a deserter is? You are a deserter if you are at the front gate of your compound when you are not supposed to be, if you do not intend to return to your assigned post. Even if that assigned post is patrolling that wall.

  13. logicalone

    logicalone said, 1 day ago

    @WiseOrator

    So what do you call saying things like “When your opponent has their ideas, opinions and verbal abuses provided to them by the Ministries of Faulty Information,”?
    Your insults are okay, right? Obviously anyone that disagrees with you isn’t worth talking to. They are less human. You are so blind to your own brain-washing you don’t know when you are calling the kettle black or when you are the black kettle.

  14. logicalone

    logicalone said, 1 day ago

    @WiseOrator

    You say a complete falsehood and admit it in the first paragraph. Amazing.


    I was in the military, if you don’t have the guts to stand up for your convictions. Keep your mouth shut, fulfill your term of service (that you volunteered for) and leave.


    You have no trouble throwing the word traitor around at people that in their hearts are trying to save our country from future nuclear horrors. You may not see it that way, but they do. So, again, who is the name caller?


    Obviously you don’t know what a deserter is…A.W.O.L. is what you described.


    Here is the government saying the president broke the law in relation to this trade…
    Use facts, I do.


    http://www.gao.gov/products/B-326013#mt=e-report

  15. canFunny

    canFunny said, 1 day ago

    You guys had a nice argument going on there; however, there is a missing fact, if you sign up for the military and don’t realize that you could be sent to war, you are an idiot. T

  16. Load the rest of the comments (27).