Michael Ramirez by Michael Ramirez

Michael Ramirez

Comments (23) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. piobaire

    piobaire said, 10 months ago

    Excellent questions!

  2. John Locke

    John Locke said, 10 months ago

    9 / ll is the reason. Have you forgotten?

  3. John Locke

    John Locke said, 10 months ago


    You asked why we went to war in Afghanistan. I gave you the answer. Your new question is beyond the scope of a cartoon blog.

  4. Jase99

    Jase99 said, 10 months ago

    Is Ramirez suggesting we stay and sacrifice more “lambs”?

  5. Robert Landers

    Robert Landers said, 10 months ago

    And your name calling and obvious hatred of anyone to theeft of such as Rush Limbaugh is somehow going OT solve all of our problems?

  6. warjoski

    warjoski GoComics PRO Member said, 10 months ago


    Bush started the wars. Obama continued them. Even after winning the Nobel Peace Prize. Let’s face facts. They’re both terrible presidents.

  7. jack75287

    jack75287 said, 10 months ago

    @CCNJ's say the sky is falling

    He is in un-teachable.

  8. josefw

    josefw GoComics PRO Member said, 10 months ago

    The health department should shut that kitchen down!

  9. jack75287

    jack75287 said, 10 months ago

    @John Locke

    Woolner hasn’t forgotten he is in denial.

  10. jack75287

    jack75287 said, 10 months ago

    Who wants salmonella.

  11. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, 10 months ago

    The PNAC folks had the invasion of Iraq planned before “W” even took office, Afghanistan was just an “inconvenient side-step”, that they killed a lot of folks with, but didn’t get the guys responsible for 9/11. Then they dreamed up WMDs that everyone knew didn’t exist in viable form, but anyone crossing the PNAC folks was a “traitor” (hmm, there’s some AIPAC influence there as well.).

    Obama followed yes, the reduction in force policy from "W"s time, but when he did, all the repubtards like Ramirez say that it’s suddenly all wrong?

    Al Qaeda surged in numbers, and came into existing at all in Iraq, as a result of "W"’s running of the wars. Gates was part of that, and the real, total, and absolute “politics” and screwup, was invading EITHER country with huge numbers of troops to replace the regimes in the first place, PERIOD!

    My friends and family were "W"’s sacrificial lambs, either dead or disabled for life, and yes BUSH DID IT!

    Interesting that the same folks who didn’t blame Nixon for running Viet Nam longer than LBJ, are the same ones blaming Obama for getting us OUT of Iraq and Afghanistan.

    Oh, right, he’s now cooking up more sacrificial lambs because he has NOT started a war with Iran, that so many repubtards (term used to apply to a specific sub-group of greedheads, chidkenhawks, and moronic supporters) are stoking for???

    First person who can prove we have a right or responsibility under law, U.S. or international, to run Afghanistan, Iraq, or Iran, may take the floor.

  12. wbr

    wbr said, 10 months ago

    overtaxed barry soetoro will run in 2016

  13. furnituremaker

    furnituremaker said, 10 months ago


    if memory serves, Obama GOT us out of Iraq, and is in the process of getting us out of Afganistan (sp)…or am I dreaming?

  14. Robert Landers

    Robert Landers said, 10 months ago

    When you use such terms as libtroll you lose all credibility. The worst term I have ever used (to my knowledge) is ultra conservative, and that is only telling the truth about many here, and is not meant as a hate term at all. In fact in some areas (such as crime) I am just as ultra conservative as most such on these boards I am against the death penalty only because it is so permanent, and it is not enough punishment for some crimes, life in prison without the possibility of ever being paroled is a far harsher punishment anyway. I would guess by your reasoning that makes me hateful against extreme criminals!!

  15. Robert Landers

    Robert Landers said, 10 months ago


    Thanks for the vote of confidence, on this site that iS deeply appreciated! But you know, cubefarmer’s remarks are just the classic definition of the remarks of an internet troll. That is, remarks designed to inspire nothing but anger in others!! I must admit, that to me at least, he did at least somewhat succeed!!

  16. Load the rest of the comments (8).