Michael Ramirez by Michael Ramirez

Michael Ramirez

Comments (25) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. wmconelly

    wmconelly said, about 3 years ago

    Here’s next: Global warming now ‘unequivocal.’ The UN’s climate panel says it is 95% certain that humans are to blame for global warming. Gads, when will those liberal pinko communist scientists ever STOP! Come on, Rush! Come on, you Ditto Heads! MAKE ’em stop! Turn off the rest of the world!

  2. Rockngolfer

    Rockngolfer said, about 3 years ago

    Holy mackerel, and this is a right wing cartoonist!

  3. Brutatowski

    Brutatowski said, about 3 years ago

    We simply cannot afford Obamacare. That’s why the debt ceiling debate. We’ll have to raise the debt ceiling in order to pay for it. It was predicated on the wrongheaded assumption that the ecomony would increase by 9% a year in order to pay for it. No one with a foothold in reality would ever believe that would happen.

  4. The Wolf In Your Midst

    The Wolf In Your Midst said, about 3 years ago

    He believes whoever tells him what he wants to hear: Everything is fine, and he doesn’t have to change his lifestyle one iota.

  5. jack75287

    jack75287 said, about 3 years ago

    Don’t see how Cruz is going backwards.

  6. jack75287

    jack75287 said, about 3 years ago


    Show me a post!

  7. disgustedtaxpayer

    disgustedtaxpayer said, about 3 years ago

    I expected better from Ramirez.
    This depiction of Cruz’ efforts exposes a lack of understanding of Conservative issues and principles, IMO.
    Article “Ted Cruz Extends the Buckley Rule”, 9/26/13, at
    http://spectator.org written by Jeffrey Lord. Printed 6 pages.
    “Cruz has effectively extended what is known as “The Buckley Rule” (Wm.F.Buckley, no doubt looking down approvingly at Senator Cruz) which is (changing) from a focus on candidates to A FOCUS ON ISSUES."
    Of course this is within the Republican Party. Democrats operate IMO in the nether regions of “issues”….and their presidential election Platform demonstrates it clearly, every 4 years. They don’t understand the necessity of this argument that if won by the Conservatives, may save the Elephant from extinction. The current GOP leaders in the Senate don’t get it…their go along to get along MO caused ex-GOP-voters to sit out elections and allow such Lefties as Obama to win.
    But Obamacare is too big a threat to our free enterprise system, to allow personalities to obscure what is at issue, and the American people need to follow the leaders who are supporting the principles that created and developed the best type of government on this planet. Period. Case closed.

  8. eugene57

    eugene57 said, about 3 years ago


    You don’t understand, period

  9. Enoki

    Enoki said, about 3 years ago

    Except the Romans didn’t use elephants… The Carthigenians did and they lost.

  10. eugene57

    eugene57 said, about 3 years ago

    Nuclear may be doing (or may do) better because of AGW.

  11. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, about 3 years ago


    Only until we find out what’s really happening to our oceans and its inhabitants as a result of what’s happening in Fukishima….which will affect anyone that uses the ocean dwellers as a food supply. This will have a much more chilling effect on the nuclear industry than Three Mile Island or even Chernobyl. And that is why the media is mostly silent. Anyone who needs proof that the media is truly not liberal: here it is.

  12. Uncle Joe

    Uncle Joe GoComics PRO Member said, about 3 years ago

    OK. Explain how the ice cap GREW by 60% in 2012 compared to 2011. All the top scientists can’t. The were embarrassed to try to explain to the UN how that happened, because they couldn’t.

    2011 set an all time record for the least amount of ice. The 60% figure is disputed, but even so:

    “Around 80% of the ~100 scientists at the Bjerknes [Arctic climate science] conference thought that there would be MORE Arctic sea-ice in 2013, compared to 2012.”

    Why would climate scientists expect more ice if global warming is real? They knew the summertime ice loss was less severe than the year before, and having one extreme year doesn’t mean the next will be even more extreme. It’s the trend over multiple years that matters.

    Despite the increase compared to 2011, there was less ice than a decade ago. The trend has been going on for decades. If we see more ice on average for the next ten years, you can write a breathless assertion that the polar ice is recovering.


  13. Uncle Joe
  14. Ardvarck

    Ardvarck GoComics PRO Member said, about 3 years ago

    They did explain and show the cycles over the past decades. You didn’t read far enough or didn’t want to.

  15. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, about 3 years ago

    WOW! Even Ramirez recognize the guy is an idiot!! (NOT “hate”, just an observation!)

  16. Load the rest of the comments (10).