Michael Ramirez by Michael Ramirez

Michael Ramirez

Comments (21) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Jeff H

    Jeff H said, over 1 year ago

    “My, there seem to be only 2 petals on this flower…”

  2. Mephistopholes

    Mephistopholes GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    I think the war on drugs has been an epic failure!!!!
    It has been expensive, unnecessary, and ruined countless lives by criminalizing a behavior that MIGHT lead further crime:

    The war on drugs decimated communities, left families fatherless, motherless and in poverty, helped bankrupt the country with all the money we spent on interdiction, prosecution and incarceration.

    That being said – I think Eric Holder is doing it wrong. He should be lobbying congress to change the laws and not just unilaterally decide he won’t enforce them because that is NOT the job of the executive branch.

    I rarely like his positions but on this one I applaud him for trying to do something. I just think it is the wrong thing.

    Lobby your congressmen people. Decriminalize much of the drug trade. Embrace freedom (including the freedom to do something as stupid as using drugs) and stay out of your neighbors business.

    For those of you who will spout the evils of drugs. Let me remind you that the world didn’t fall apart when we enacted the 21st amendment. Imagine all the money we would save if we could Half the number of prosecutions and incarcerations. Imagine the money we would save if we didn’t need enormous coast guard cutters running up and down the coast harassing fishermen and dayboaters. Imagine the growth in the economy if those that are incarcerated were allowed to be fully productive rather then languishing in a cell.

  3. ARodney

    ARodney said, over 1 year ago

    Since the GOP house is incapable of passing laws, all governing now has to come from courts, the president, the EPA, the Fed, and Eric Holder. There are too many non-violent criminals in jail, and it costs $80 billion a year. If the GOP actually wanted to solve this problem, they could pass a law changing mandatory sentencing. Or raise taxes to keep the criminals locked away at our expense. Either course requires governing, which the GOP is incapable of doing, so good on Eric Holder for taking action.

  4. wmconelly

    wmconelly said, over 1 year ago

    A survey from Fairleigh Dickinson University has found that viewers of Fox News are less informed about world events than people who do not watch ANY news; that is, 18 points less likely to know, for example, that Egyptians overthrew their government, six points less likely to know that Syrians have not yet overthrown their government; this in comparison to those who watch no news. Fairleigh Dickinson political science Professor Dan Cassino said, “The results show us that there is something about watching Fox News that leads people to do worse on these questions than those who don’t watch any news at all.”

    Goes for Ramirez’s cartoons, in my opinion: study ‘em and end up knowing less than you’d glean from common sense.

  5. DGF999

    DGF999 said, over 1 year ago


    Drugs have decimated communities, left families fatherless, motherless and in poverty,


  6. The Wolf In Your Midst

    The Wolf In Your Midst said, over 1 year ago


    Seeing you demonize the people you hate is nothing new, but at least you’ve embraced multimedia. That’s progress, I guess….

  7. jack75287

    jack75287 said, over 1 year ago

    Issues with holder include, AP investigation, Fast and Furious, in contempt of the House with no less than 17 Democrats crossing party lines. There is a lot more please add your own.

  8. Rad-ish

    Rad-ish GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    The right wing really fear Holder, thats why they have to hate him and demonize him.

  9. Uncle Joe

    Uncle Joe GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago


    “It always ends up “Not enforce the law” for Holder.”

    You realize he’s deciding whether or not to prosecute George Zimmerman for for hate crimes…

  10. denis1112

    denis1112 said, over 1 year ago


    I think the conclusion is ‘watch fox news then believe the opposite’

    Those pesky videos .How does FOX get the dims to say and do that stuff for them over and over and over?

  11. denis1112

    denis1112 said, over 1 year ago

    The Democrats will never do anything to endanger stupifying
    drug use.Nor would the dims do anything to endager the supply of dope like enforce border security.They would soon have a lot fewer voters that vote 4-5 times and for 10-12 years after they die.
    Folks that sit around drunk and high all the time that get food stamps,rent subsidies,Obama phones,and free medical will always vote against the people that work 6-7 months a year to pay for their free ride.
    If the tax payers complain ,they must be racists.

  12. Mephistopholes

    Mephistopholes GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    @DGF999 – I concede that excessive use of drugs have brought about the demise of some people and families; but so have many other activities.

    If we can agree the goal of the government is to help families and communities (as opposed to harm them) and either path (intercede or ignore) can lead to harm then I argue the Government should take the least obtrusive path.

    What you are seeing is the ultimate outcome of the nanny state. The government can’t win at prohibition – Why do you think we have the 21st amendment?

    Not only do I not want my government unnecessarily trodding on the rights of my neighbors. I don’t want them using my tax dollars to do it.

  13. Uncle Joe

    Uncle Joe GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago


    “If the tax payers complain ,they must be racists.”

    When you put it like that, I can’t help but agree. Whatever your point is, you’d be more convincing if you brought up facts instead of racist stereotypes. Rural whites rely on most of the same programs in equal numbers as urban blacks. Are they just sitting around getting drunk & high, too?

  14. Wraithkin

    Wraithkin said, over 1 year ago


    Food for thought: The War on Drugs wouldn’t have decimated those families and communities if drugs weren’t present to begin with. Those who turn to drugs, regardless of the type, are guilty of a crime and should face the penalty for committing said crime.

    What you’re supporting is tantamount to legalizing the import of dangerous, addictive, and deadly drugs. Those boats coming from South America aren’t carrying fluffy bunnies and rainbows. They are carrying death in a needle: Heroine, Crack, etc.

    And for those incarcerated individuals who would be “productive” members of society, you are making a massive assumption regarding their capability to hold a job. You also are assuming there are jobs for those people to fill. They are probably costing us less in Prison than if they were on some eleventy versions of social aid.

  15. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, over 1 year ago


    Well written, and to the point. Certainly some drugs are more debilitating than others. I read that Denmark has eliminated all drug laws and have methadone trucks on street corners. The idea is that children will see the people strung out on methadone and decide for themselves that it’s a path they don’t want to follow. A big gamble, to sacrifice part of one generation to better the next one, but it seems to be working.

    But most people know that pot does not make anyone angry, vicious, or violent, as opposed to, say, alcohol, or caffeine in large enough quantities. And most people jailed for drugs are jailed for small amounts of pot.

    10 years ago, a friend of mine flew on a commercial flight. The guy next to him was a DEA agent, who told him that—at that time—it was estimated that 3 out of 5 American households had pot in it.

    If everyone who ever smoked pot walked to the police station and turned themselves in, we’d have more people in jail than out of it.

    Legalize and tax marijuana. Way fewer single-parent families as a result, and you’d be surprised how the debt would reduce.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (6).