Michael Ramirez by Michael Ramirez

Michael Ramirez

Comments (23) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    Now the important fact is he kept Obama in the dark. He met with Obama many times but this did not go as planned so Obama is completely clueless. Or maybe it did go as planned but was not to get out? Either way minions must protect Obama. It is After the elections so the lies before congress don’t have to be as pronounced but Obama must stay in the dark.
    http://dailycaller.com/2013/05/29/irss-shulman-had-more-public-white-house-visits-than-any-cabinet-member/

  2. denis1112

    denis1112 said, over 1 year ago

    @Dycel

    Is this a stoned stream of conscious post?

  3. Sr NONliberal

    Sr NONliberal said, over 1 year ago

    are the footprints also giving us a hint on who is responsible? I see a big 0. libs, hang it up…you are either stupid or you are the biggest hypocrites…so which is it?

  4. Respectful Troll

    Respectful Troll said, over 1 year ago

    History shows that the truth comes out. If Mr. Holder lied to congress and ordered gov’t agents to act inappropriately or even illegally, he will deserve the same punishment as others who have abused their authority.
    That said,
    Pardon me if I don’t get his prison cell ready or warm up the electric chair yet. I’d like to see the arrest and trial take place first.
    Respectfully,
    C.

  5. d_legendary1 Demands Dr.C's Release

    d_legendary1 Demands Dr.C's Release said, over 1 year ago

    @DrCanuck

    They’re gonna find him in contempt of congress (again) for holding out on the non-existent evidence that brings down the Obama administration.

  6. jack75287

    jack75287 said, over 1 year ago

    @DrCanuck

    The fact he is investigating himself! On May 15 Holder was asked by Congressmen Hank Johnson if Holder thought the DOJ could prosecute reporters under the espionage act of 1917. Holder replied “In regard to potential prosecution of the press for the disclosure of material — this is not something I’ve ever been involved in, heard of, or would think would be wise policy,”

    Then NBC news broke the stroy that Holder signed a search warrant on Fox News reporter James Rosen.

    Maybe what you and I think of as evidence is two different things.

  7. disgustedtaxpayer

    disgustedtaxpayer said, over 1 year ago

    I agree with jack75287’s post. Obamaites live in fantasy land where the Constitution and Law of the Land do not exist, once elected or appointed and sworn to obey the laws, they Xout the oath in their minds and proceed to act in arrogance of the voters and taxpayers in working a Democratic Agenda, no matter how many civil rights they violate.
    -
    Obama and his cabinet work for Americans.
    They owe the US Public answers to every oversight Question.
    And they owe Honest Answers and do not deserve any 5th amendment claims in congressional hearings to try to find the TRUTH in every scandal.
    Benghazi, IRS, EPA misfeasances cause the news to be Scandals. “I didn’t know” and “I can’t recall” are not Honest Answers. Lies are even worse responses. Paid suspensions are not proper responses, as with Mz. Lerner. Some of the accused ought to be wearing orange suits in testifying to congressional hearings, IMO. Perjury and Lying ought to be severely punished, including jail time or at least being on a List of BANNED FOR FEDERAL EMPLOYMENT.

  8. Wraithkin

    Wraithkin said, over 1 year ago

    @DrCanuck

    Hate to break it to you Doc, but the others are right. Holder committed perjury before Congress. He stated he never had any involvement in the DOJ investigations into the news outlets, and yet his signature is on one of the forms authorizing those seizures. He lied, my friend. That’s perjury and contempt of Congress, at best.

    The more that gets uncovered, the more worrisome this situation becomes. I’m still withholding judgement on this, but it’s not looking good for the DOJ. If that ties to the White House? Then they deserve to burn for it to. But that connection hasn’t been made, yet. If it ever is? This will make Nixon look like a puddy cat.

  9. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, over 1 year ago

    @disgustedtaxpayer

    You are correct in many of your points. I’m sure you were equally disturbed when Alfredo Gonzalez couldn’t remember anything other than his own name when he “testified” to congress. And you were strongly demanding the heads of Condoleezza Rice, Paul Wolfowitz, Doug Feith, and of course Dubya and Darth Cheney when all that dirty dealing was going on. I know I was.

    Somehow or another, Congress didn’t do much about them.

    Now that it is no longer the case that you are a terrorist if you oppose the president, I have a feeling that something about Mr. Holder’s case will suddenly make them understand the law much better than they could in the past.

  10. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, over 1 year ago

    @PAJ

    “Will need a new POTUS that does not blindly protect his appointments.”

    I imagine you were saying this from 2000 to 2008, as well.

    “Meet the new boss…….Same as the old boss…”

  11. Harleyquinn

    Harleyquinn GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    @disgustedtaxpayer

    They owe the US Public answers to every oversight Question.
    And they owe Honest Answers and do not deserve any 5th amendment claims in congressional hearings to try to find the TRUTH in every scandal."
    The 5th.. you know what bothers me, she claimed to be innocent, then plead the 5th. Plead the 5th to what? what was she charged with? This was a fact finding hearing, not a ok if we can prove to the jury of the american public that you are an Obama hack, then maybe the 5th would apply. But what is up with it? did we forget to read her her miranda right? Imean really, if she was charged and asked a direct question or an indirect gotcha question then yeh, I do not have to say a word for you will have a sound bite that could be taken out of context. But she was asked nothing but to show up! Can you be in contempt of the hearing like you can for a court of law?

  12. raalden

    raalden said, over 1 year ago

    Bush Bush Bush. Is that all you retard libs have at THIS point. BO has far eclipsed ANYTHING anyone could call out Bush for. Morons.

  13. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    I’m with “I Play One on TV”. I don’t like “over reach” , but Holder can’t hold a candle to Ashcroft and Gonzales, and their “team”.

  14. cuchobear

    cuchobear said, over 1 year ago

    Holder and his “boy”: BO smelling their own sh|t.

  15. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, over 1 year ago

    @PAJ

    No argument here. Now is now. I just find it amusing that so many people are shocked by things they didn’t even seem to notice in the past.

    Why is it that suddenly what some of us used to yawn at is now the end of civilization as we know it?

    That was and still is my point. That, and the fact that, if we had followed the law of the land in the last administration, it would have been much less likely that this administration would feel privileged to flaunt the law now.

    At the time, I said, “Don’t give power to Mr. Bush that you wouldn’t want to give to Hillary Clinton.” You can see that nobody listened then…..

  16. Load the rest of the comments (8).