Michael Ramirez by Michael Ramirez

Michael Ramirez

Comments (23) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. petergrt

    petergrt said, over 2 years ago

    The end of the Cold War released the American leftists from the underground – out into the Congress and the White House . . . . . the real Cold War Dividend.

  2. Redeemd

    Redeemd said, over 2 years ago

    One debt-ridden country for sale! Yuans and riyals accepted!

  3. Wraithkin

    Wraithkin said, over 2 years ago

    @rvernon

    Quite the contrary. Today’s conservatives look like the liberals of the early 20th century.

  4. jack75287

    jack75287 said, over 2 years ago

    @rvernon

    “If only that were so. We’ve drifted so far to the right in the last 30 years that everything, to you, looks “left.””
    Explain Obama, Reed & Pelosi?

  5. jack75287

    jack75287 said, over 2 years ago

    Let’s remember what the left did in the early 20th century. Woody Wilson Segregated the Country & we are still paying for that. Roosevelt said he would fix the economy 8 years and WWII later our industry was rebuilt.

  6. NebulousRikulau

    NebulousRikulau GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    Anybody remember “Better dead than Red”?

  7. jack75287

    jack75287 said, over 2 years ago

    NebulousRikulau the red ink is an old accounting statement. Red for debt black for profit. $750,000 of the red ink is a soccer field for the Islamic Freedom Fighters being held by the Imperialist Americans Of the United States at Guantanamo Bay Cuba. It was paid for by the Progressive tax payers of the United States. Hey wait?

  8. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    Reid has been in the pocket of mining and grazing folks in Nevada for a long time, plus the casino money; well Newt seems to be really dipping into THAT cash! The simple fact is that despite their tax increases under Reagan and Bush 41 in an effort to reverse the error of “voodoo economics”, that disaster REMAINS responsible for most of our debt. It should be noted that “voodoo” includes war-making to instill fear in the nation, and maintain war spending, and profiteering, no matter the cost to taxpayers, and those shedding the blood. (Think Grenada and Panama in that “overkill effect”, not just Afghanistan and Iraq.)

  9. Rad-ish

    Rad-ish GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    Reagan proved that debt does not matter, as Cheney said.

  10. yohannbiimu

    yohannbiimu said, over 2 years ago

    @Rad-ish

    At one time running up the debt was “unpatriotic” (Barack Obama on July 3, 2008, after 4 trillion of spending over eight years). Now, Obama has spent trillion over less than four years, and there’s nothing to see.

  11. yohannbiimu

    yohannbiimu said, over 2 years ago

    @dtroutma

    You are a sad casualty of the indoctrination of the American youth, who bend your spine leftward in knee-jerk fashion whenever you hear that there’s a problem with the economy. Reagan’s tax policy was the same as Kennedy’s and Coolege’s, and it brought about INCREASES in tax revenues. Read this: http://www.house.gov/jec/fiscal/tx-grwth/reagtxct/reagtxct.htm and this: http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2002/12/tax-cuts-increase-federal-revenues The debt increased during the ;80’s because massive spending increases. It explains why California (the most taxed state in the country) is flat broke. It isn’t Reagan’s error, but rather John Maynard Keynes’.

  12. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    ruff, and yes, California’s base economic problems DO trace to Reagan’s time as “Governator”.

  13. RGRodgers

    RGRodgers GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    Using the term “right-wing nuts” disqualifies you from intelligent discussion.

  14. Heavy B

    Heavy B said, over 2 years ago

    @yohannbiimu

    Anyone else remember when st reagan raised taxes 11 times. He cut them in ’81, then went on a tax hiking spree

  15. UU Admin

    UU Admin GoComics PRO Member said, over 2 years ago

    @Eryx

    Eryx, as I told you in our correspondence, I try to give some leeway on the editorial pages. I do delete personal attacks, insults and name-calling, when I see them. If I see someone who’s a repeat offender with personal attacks, I’ll ban them. Most of what I’m alerted to is because of the flagging system.
    Just be sure that what you flag deserves to be flagged. I saw three people conspire to flag “libby times” every time he posts. I simply ignore the flags from those individuals. But if something deserves to be deleted, feel free to flag it.
    And trust me on this: I show no favoritism for one point of view over the other. I just want to keep things (somewhat) civil.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (8).