Matt Wuerker by Matt Wuerker

Matt Wuerker

Recommended

Comments (25) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. mikefive

    mikefive said, 7 months ago

    Funny ’toon, Not so funny for some in Washington.

  2. jonesb

    jonesb said, 7 months ago

    They’re also doing all the stuff they’ve made it illegal for us to do.

  3. walruscarver2000

    walruscarver2000 said, 7 months ago

    The true Washington contest: FBI v CIA over your privacy.

  4. masterskrain

    masterskrain said, 7 months ago

    EVERYBODY PANIC!!!

  5. ansonia

    ansonia said, 7 months ago

    LOL

  6. onguard

    onguard said, 7 months ago

    The Pot must be stirred regularly …..Term Limits.

  7. walruscarver2000

    walruscarver2000 said, 7 months ago

    Well. at least we don’t have to worry about finding Republicans with other women.

  8. Fourcrows

    Fourcrows said, 7 months ago

    “I once sent a dozen of my friends a telegram saying ‘flee at once – all is discovered.’ They all left town immediately.”
    - Mark Twain

  9. Tue Elung-Jensen

    Tue Elung-Jensen said, 7 months ago

    @jonesb

    ofc. we are all equal, but some are more equal than others :)

  10. ARodney

    ARodney said, 7 months ago

    Term limits would have done NOTHING in the current scandals. They’ve done nothing positive where they’ve been tried. If you want turnover, the solution is to let candidates compete on a level playing field — eliminate gerrymandering, limit campaign contributions — not “affirmitive action” style firing of everyone regardless of competence.

  11. braindead08

    braindead08 said, 7 months ago

    @ARodney

    Yeah, well, term limits are a quick fix, easily conprehended by the electorate, and require little, if any reinforcement. Are they better than nothing?
    -
    Elimination, or at least reduction, of gerrymandering in California has Republicans screaming and filing suits — Democrats are just screaming.
    -
    Campaign finance reform? Wasn’t that part of Newt’s Contract with America? Never even got a committee vote.

  12. walruscarver2000

    walruscarver2000 said, 7 months ago

    @Fourcrows

    Didn’t know Twain hung around with the GOP.

  13. walruscarver2000

    walruscarver2000 said, 7 months ago

    @braindead08

    Yeah, term limits, Wouldn’t want to hold the public responsible for who they vote for. And God forbid they should be able to hold on to a good one if they get one.

  14. 1opinion

    1opinion said, 7 months ago

    @walruscarver2000

    Lobbyist already “help” the newly elected write and interpret bills. Term limits without some way of preparing new congress-people and senators , could work against the american people. I also realize it may in some ways be advantageous, but probably the negatives outweigh the positives.

  15. walruscarver2000

    walruscarver2000 said, 7 months ago

    @1opinion

    Maybe, and I know this is radical thinking, maybe we should get rid of the lobbyist.
    (last I heard,they outnumbered the members of congress.)

  16. Load the rest of the comments (10).