Matt Wuerker by Matt Wuerker

Matt Wuerker

Comments (21) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, almost 4 years ago

    MItt did turn in the most fantastic performance I’ve ever seen, from any politician. “Tricky Dick” wouldn’t have begun to insult people’s intelligence with such a pack of absolute lies, flip-flops, and gall. The Republicans, media, and bloggers, must not have seen a single one of his speeches, or the primary debates, to even BEGIN to believe such a load.

  2. saywhatwhat

    saywhatwhat said, almost 4 years ago

    I didn’t see it live and haven’t finished listening to the recording. But the whole President by popularity contest is the real problem. The Founding Fathers got a lot of things right (the compromise they hammered out could be considered a miracle), but they were wrong about trying so hard to avoid political parties.
    Obama wasn’t in top form. It must be hard playing “vote for me, I’m wonderful” when you have a day job.
    http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/07/world/middleeast/syria.html?ref=world&_r=0

  3. Tue Elung-Jensen

    Tue Elung-Jensen said, almost 4 years ago

    True. Wether or not it was due to bad strategy, or having his mind on other things he could have performed alot better.

  4. avarner

    avarner said, almost 4 years ago

    It was simply a contest between Style and Substance.

    Substance won, as it always does.

  5. walruscarver2000

    walruscarver2000 said, almost 4 years ago

    @avarner

    If you’re referring to Romney as “substance”, please be sure to clean the substance fromyour shoes before entering.

  6. Jeddidyah

    Jeddidyah said, almost 4 years ago

    @dtroutma

    Maybe that is why Obama just looked down and shook his head. Every time he made a point Willard responded with a pack of lies. No sense in debating with anyone who makes up their facts on the fly. It is just a waste of time.

  7. Jeddidyah

    Jeddidyah said, almost 4 years ago

    “just like his five boys always lied when they’d done something wrong. (Which also shows that he was a great father who taught his sons well.)

    "
    .
    Like father, like Sons…they must have been all good Mormons.

  8. thebaldtexican

    thebaldtexican said, almost 4 years ago

    OMG, a politician lying. Where are my heart pills! Thank goodness, Obama has been a true saint, and never ever told a lie, stretched the truth, prevaricated…..

  9. Machado

    Machado GoComics PRO Member said, almost 4 years ago

    Hey Matt, save some excuses for the next debates, you going to need them…

  10. disgustedtaxpayer

    disgustedtaxpayer said, almost 4 years ago

    History proved that reducing tax rates can provide increased IRS revenue…..check gov’t numbers on Reagan’s term…lowering the super-high tax rate on “the rich” caused different behaviour by the “rich” who had protected their money during high rate times, and when Reagan’s rates took effect, the “rich” began using their idle $s to do more investing and that increased economic activity all across the board…thereby raising revenues to a historic new high of an annual $900 billion, plus, in the 1980s.
    -
    same deal in 1961 with JFK.

  11. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, almost 4 years ago

    Folks need to pay more attention to what the Republican controlled House, and Republican “restricted” Senate have done. If Mitt gets in, the House stays in Republican control, and gain any more power in the Senate, I would predict a near total economic collapse within four months of the change in the White House, and the total destruction of everything America has built, conserved, and preserved for over 200 years.


    The fact that Mitt would be the first “Total liar in chief”, with the brain of a walnut, smacked, cracked, and controlled by such as Adelson, Rove, Norquist, and Cheney, would be our biggest disaster, ever.

  12. walruscarver2000

    walruscarver2000 said, almost 4 years ago

    No. As usual you display your wanton refusal to understand plain English. I’d go further, but you’ve already been told by another “You are becoming more and more irrelevant.”

  13. walruscarver2000

    walruscarver2000 said, almost 4 years ago

    To Ima: “You are becoming more and more irrelevant.”
    I take it you don’t come here very often.

  14. Jeddidyah

    Jeddidyah said, almost 4 years ago

    @disgustedtaxpayer

    “thereby raising revenues to a historic new high of an annual $900 billion, plus, in the 1980s.”
    .
    Pure BS. Federal tax revenues were 347 billion in Reagan’s first year and 496 billion in his last year in office, that is a gain of only 149 Billion over 8 years. His first term in office there was a net loss of tax revenue and you conveniently ignored the fact the he raised taxes 11 times in his second term.
    .
    If the federal tax income went up so much, how is it that the National debt went from 996 billion in 1981 to 3.1 trillion in 1988 ?
    .
    http://www.usgovernmentrevenue.com/downchart_gr.php?year=1980_1988&view=1&expand=&units=b&log=linear&fy=fy12&chart=10-fed&bar=0&stack=1&size=m&title=&state=US&color=c&local=s

  15. Jeddidyah

    Jeddidyah said, almost 4 years ago

    @walruscarver2000

    Please find me a post where ima was even relevant, let alone coherent.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (6).