Comments (8) (Please sign in to comment)

1. 

   cfimeiatpap said, almost 3 years ago

   Just the tip of the iceberg (so to speak)……….. http://www.energybulletin.net/node/9524
2. 

   Ken Warren said, almost 3 years ago

   I’m confussed! Are going to kill a GP excutive a day until the oil leak is plugged?
3. 

   rottenprat said, almost 3 years ago

   Draconian measures, next on Oprah.
4. 

   SuperGriz said, almost 3 years ago

   Ken Warren said, about 9 hours ago

   I’m confused! Are going to kill a GP executive a day until the oil leak is plugged?

   Sounds like a plan.
5. 

   W(ar).Crime said, almost 3 years ago

   No Ken. He wants the BP exec. to put the gulf coast in there.
6. 

   W(ar).Crime said, almost 3 years ago

   ^^Don’t you know we’re a nation of junkies? We go to Canada for our legal drugs, go to Mexico for the illegal drugs, and go to China for our cheap cr@p.

   We’re dependent on the world now. Take care of us d@mmit!
7. 

   Corosive Frog said, almost 3 years ago

   ^ You wouldn’t be if people wouldn’t want so much of all that crap.

   But wasting and consuming is seen as a right. People hate Carter like he was a war criminal just because he told suburbanites to stop acting like four-year olds in a candy store and spend a little less. They love Bush because he told the exact opposite; “Go shop”.
8. 

   W(ar).Crime said, almost 3 years ago

   ^Its all up to what gets the tax breaks. If we gave breaks on cleaner energy alternatives people would be making and creating cleaner ways of moving around. But instead, we’re giving tax breaks on gas guzzling s.u.v. (as much as $25,000 lifetime of the car as depreciation for a small business) for being “light non-commerical vehicles” weighing a little above 6,000 pounds.

   See why we’re so backwards?
9. Refresh Comments.