Matt Bors by Matt Bors

Matt Bors

Comments (32) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. BrassOrchid

    BrassOrchid GoComics PRO Member said, almost 2 years ago

    Mostly, I just use it to cut down straw men… that I constructed… to cut down in a heavy firefight… after I’m sure that they are unarmed and indefensible.

  2. ARodney

    ARodney said, almost 2 years ago

    A kid was just arrested in Utah for bringing a gun to school to protect against shooters. Fortunately, they took it out of school. Because it turns out, more guns do not make a place safer. They make it more dangerous. Remember the Wall Street shooting? Imagine if instead of trained police popping off and wounding innocent bystanders, it had been your average gun nuts. Or imagine if the Aurora Theater had been packed with people packing heat, each shooting at everyone else who drew a gun. The solution is taking away the weapons of mass destruction, not in killing more people.

  3. masterskrain

    masterskrain GoComics PRO Member said, almost 2 years ago

    You know, you MIGHT just be able to get a few more people to pay attention to your right-wing ranting if you learned how to spell, and punctuate properly, as well as actually using proper English!
    It’s “Too dumb”, not “To dumb…”
    And, you do know what capital letters are for, don’t you?
    By the way, the first of the “Weak Anti-Gun” arguments were buried the other day…

  4. ronald rini

    ronald rini said, almost 2 years ago

    @masterskrain

    one of the reason people kill. because they are put people down because of they are not as smart as they are. Of course they may be

  5. ronald rini

    ronald rini said, almost 2 years ago

    Heck I like the Idea. Its like archie bunker said when people get on a plane give them a gun. And see how many people stand up and say this is a hi jacking

  6. Jase99

    Jase99 said, almost 2 years ago

    to dumb to really make a comment on except how stupid this is and how weak of an anti gun argument the loony left has.

    In other words, you have no counter argument.

  7. masterskrain

    masterskrain GoComics PRO Member said, almost 2 years ago

    @ronald rini

    Please see the comment about proper spelling, punctuation, and the use of capitals.
    Seriously, I’m not “putting anyone down”, but those mistakes do enforce the stereotype of the “semi-illiterate redneck, wearing the camo, and screaming about the Government coming to take all his guns away, while sitting in his single-wide trailer!” that a lot of people have.
    By the way, I live in Kentucky, and I actually KNOW some of those people.

  8. Fourcrows

    Fourcrows said, almost 2 years ago

    You know, Clinton’s assault weapon ban expired in 2004, and Obama’s election caused a rush on gun buying, particularly assault weapons and high capacity ammo magazines. I think the empirical evidence shows that more guns is not the answer.
    On the other hand, countries with more retrictive gun laws have fewer crimes in general, since guns make committing crimes easier.

  9. bigal666

    bigal666 said, almost 2 years ago

    There are 250,000,000 privately owned guns in the USA. They aren’t going to go away. Instead of dumping mentally ill people on the street for lack of profit in treating them, we should concentrate on helping those who need it, and punish those who commit any crime whatsoever with a weapon.

  10. I Play One On TV

    I Play One On TV said, almost 2 years ago

    If you want to see how well a society functions when everybody has full access to all weapons, look no further than Iraq.

  11. spyderred

    spyderred said, almost 2 years ago

    This posturing by Congress continues because it’s easier than funding a program to treat the mentally ill. Might mean fewer bombs or ships. And after all, the mentally ill don’t make “campaign contributions” or hire K Street lobbyists, so as long as issues about guns (in the world’s biggest arms seller country) can distract the populace, why not.

  12. Tue Elung-Jensen

    Tue Elung-Jensen said, almost 2 years ago

    @ARodney

    Unfortuntely people would not understand that till it actually happened. As in you can´t make an omelet till you break a few eggs.

  13. ahab

    ahab GoComics PRO Member said, almost 2 years ago

    @Molon Labe

    Our country still far surpasses many others in the frequency and numbers killed,injured,and in the number of massacres. This wasn’t happening in the 40’s,50’s,or60’s. The NRA status quo isn’t working.

  14. Jase99

    Jase99 said, almost 2 years ago

    No, you’re just an idiot.

    In other words, you agree with Harley and, like him, have no counter argument.

  15. dannysixpack

    dannysixpack said, almost 2 years ago

    @theophilous
    you are a piece of work, arent’ you. it wassn’t wall street, it was 34th street in front of macy’s flagship store, and the police shot and killed the better part of 9 innocent bystanders, the “shooter” didn’t shoot anyone on the street. I’m not condemning the police, they HAD to do what they did, it’s a damned shame how it turned out, and that the officers have to live with it.

    you also seem quite bright and you know that whether ‘high powered rifles" or “simply semi-auto carbines” is a poor veiled attempt to minimize the damage weapons we call assault rifles can do, do do, and are INTENDED to do. It is specious to try to distract the discussion with such BS.

    your charactarizations of native americans as “savages” is just inflamatory, ignorant, and over the top. If you were on the receiving end that they were, and knew the history,you’d know it’s not too difficult to determine who the ‘savages’ were.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (17).