Lisa Benson by Lisa Benson

Lisa BensonNo Zoom

Comments (30) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. C. A. Brobst

    C. A. Brobst GoComics PRO Member said, almost 6 years ago

    The extra heat evaporates more water from the warmer oceans, which meets the ordinarily cold polar air, and plops down on us. So yes, extra snow is global warming.

  2. wolfhoundblues1

    wolfhoundblues1 said, almost 6 years ago

    Funny how the “experts” predicted that the children of the world would soon never experience snow again.

  3. Brian Baer

    Brian Baer GoComics PRO Member said, almost 6 years ago

    It is sad when editorial cartoonists have such a poor understanding of the subject they are lampooning.

  4. HabaneroBuck

    HabaneroBuck said, almost 6 years ago

    No significant rises in temperature since 1998, guys…just stop defending it, life here in the great Northeast is continuing on just as it ever has.

    Oh, Lisa, don’t you know….it’s “climate change”…yeah, they gave up on global warming years ago. Maybe you’ll buy that one?

    CA, milder and drier winters were predicted. That’s just fact.

  5. Alteri

    Alteri GoComics PRO Member said, almost 6 years ago

    With so little understanding of the phenomenon of weather, to think that one can simply dismiss the concept of global weather change as easily as one can support it is equally ignorant.

    I’ve never seen an intelligent benson cartoon.

  6. Dale Hopson

    Dale Hopson GoComics PRO Member said, almost 6 years ago

    Yes, we’ve been experiencing hotter summers and colder winters… and this cartoon makes no sense ( unless it’s an ad for snow tires ).

  7. eepatte

    eepatte said, almost 6 years ago


    No experts ever predicted that we’d never see snow again. Every time it snows or we get a cold spell, those who have bought the corporate line of climate change denial point to the weather incident as proof that “global warming” is a myth. Why don’t you get your information from science and not from corporate sponsored propagandists? Rush and company are not scientists.

    Global climate change has predicted that as the average temperatures rise, weather events like droughts, floods, hurricanes, and even blizzards, will become more intense.

  8. halfabug

    halfabug said, almost 6 years ago

    It’s easy, it’s all a crock

  9. Fluffy67

    Fluffy67 said, almost 6 years ago

    It’s hard to take any information from the “experts” seriously when we find out that their own e-mail communications exposed the fact that conspired to mislead the public with faked information they believed but could not prove. At this point, I don’t have any faith in the “experts” who feel the need to lie in order to further their agenda. The fact is everybody lies. So both sides need to get off of their high horses and admit that they just don’t know for sure. Everyone on this message board included.

  10. pavlov

    pavlov said, almost 6 years ago

    I might start worrying when Greenland becomes green again and in a hundred years it won’t matter. Until then let it snow let it snow let it snow.

  11. eepatte

    eepatte said, almost 6 years ago

    @fluff: Look at the misleading emails again. Do they really say what your right wing corporate sponsored “experts” say they say? You appear to be grasping at straws in order to believe what is convenient rather than what is true. This is almost exactly what smokers did when confronted with the overwhelming truth that smoking caused cancer. Corporate sponsors wanted it that way then, and they are spending big bucks for you to believe that way again. Do you remember the TV footage of the big tobacco execs(represented by Ken Starr!) swearing that they did not know that smoking caused cancer?

  12. disgustedtaxpayer

    disgustedtaxpayer said, almost 6 years ago

    the Left uses deceptive language and marxists moved into the “Green” arena as deception, and “global warming” changed to “climate change” is just the latest deception.

    the THEORY has been disproved, by the Eco-nut emails that document deliberate deception in the publicity for a “cause” to increase central government controls.

    And just a few years ago in the 1990s the Left Wing of Science was posing the THEORY of Global Cooling! LOL.

    Glad I don’t hang my future expectations on fallible human imagination… Bible tells me what is to come on Planet Earth…(smiley face)…Have a good snow day!

  13. Gypsy8

    Gypsy8 said, almost 6 years ago

    It’s a very complex issue I know nothing about.

    So do I go with Rush and the Righties who seem to have a profit / anti-knowledge agenda; or do I go with the scientists who study the complex body of data?

    It’s an important question. If wrong, and you do nothing, it can mean the destruction of the environment and society for future generations.

    I think I’ll go with the scientists.

  14. iamthelorax

    iamthelorax said, almost 6 years ago

    The “corporate greed fake science” argument is especially annoying to hear, considering the gobs of money made from the “green industry”.

    But the most annoying thing is how they’ve taken an important issue like air pollution and turned it into a giant load of anti-capitalist BS that people are getting tired of hearing about.

  15. HabaneroBuck

    HabaneroBuck said, almost 6 years ago

    Canbag, it won’t take much of a Google search or even wikipedia search “global warming skeptics” or “global warming controversy” to find thousands of reputable scientists who oppose the current proganda for one reason or another.

    Rush and the Righties are not scientists, this is correct. They oppose those who have an anti-liberty, One-World agenda couched in the verbiage of science.

    I will post it again because it always bears repeating, if anyone who is anyone is REALLY concerned about CO2, the immediate implementation of millions of acres of industrial hemp being grown radically addresses our energy and environmental concerns overnight. I have not heard a single senator push for this to take place. CO2 is not their concern…control is.

  16. Load the rest of the comments (15).