Lisa Benson by Lisa Benson

?fh=86b42f4bcff6a8736e494933fed0282b

Comments (49) Jump to Comments Form

  1. toasteroven

    toasteroven said, 2 months ago

    Dear lord this is stupid.

    Listen. I can draw stick figures. I’m quite adept at slapping labels on things that need no labels. And, as a bonus, I’m completely clueless.

    So, I’m going to become a political cartoonist. I mean, if these people are published, I shouldn’t have a problem, right?

  2. HUMPHRIES

    HUMPHRIESGenius_badge said, 2 months ago

    Benson must have a glass stomach to see where she’s going. W ‘s watch “viglance” !! More like letting uncle Dick round up the votes.

  3. harleyquinn

    harleyquinnGenius_badge said, 2 months ago

    Of course we don’t have to be vigilant anymore. Obama renamed the bad guys so as to not offend anyone. If they do blow up something it will be a man made bad thing. Wouldn’t want anyone to get the wrong idea that there are countries that would love to see us burn. Wouldn’t want to stir up any bad feeling about the war we are not fighting.
    The world loves us now that we have the big O in power……
    and if you drink this in I have more for ya………

  4. Buzzy-One

    Buzzy-One said, 2 months ago

    hq, come in from the cold, uncle Dick can’t bite you anymore.

  5. harleyquinn

    harleyquinnGenius_badge said, 2 months ago

    This just in…recruitment for the fine men and women of the CIA who put their buts on the line protecting our great country of ours is up. right..way to lead there big O…
    It is up as much as new Doctors entering school and Obama approval ratings…I feel safer all ready…

  6. spicecakes69

    spicecakes69 said, 2 months ago

    I guess all the torture apologists are o.k. with us having NO moral standing in the world to speak to ANY country about their human rights abuses.

    We are now abusers too and have no voice in this matter.

    Thanks George, Thanks DICK …. and thanks to all of you sheeple that still believe it is o.k. to torture.

  7. iamthelorax

    iamthelorax said, 2 months ago

    Democrats don’t actually care if the CIA tortured people, they’re just trying to deflect the bad press about their medical reform and other money-wasting projects.

    When Bush needed better poll number, he would try to raise the security level threats, and now Obama’s trick is to pull up stuff Bush did…..and the next President is going to bring up Obama’s misdeeds or something else when he or she needs to deflect bad press too.

  8. charliekane

    charliekane said, 2 months ago

    The learning curve is tough for some. Ineffective, bad policy, and just kinda wrong, don’t you think?

  9. WestTex13

    WestTex13 said, 2 months ago

    Iamthelorax - Nailed the issue on the head..

    Misdirect the outrage so you can keep doing business as usual..

    Of course if we compare Taliban torture to CIA torture then we might as well be taking them to Disney Land.. On the bright side we’re being humane enough to not cut anyone’s head off when we’re done..

  10. padagge

    padagge said, 2 months ago

    All ya’all!

    I know it’s fun to bash the folks with opposing views with your cheap shots and one-liners but in reality you are either preaching to the choir or trying to open a closed mind… why bother?… don’t waste your energy…

  11. av8tor

    av8torGenius_badge said, 2 months ago

    If your child was kidnapped by two homicidal men and the police caught one..would you ask the police to use all interrogation methods at their disposal or just be nice to the kidnapper?
    I guess they would just have to be nice so they wouldn’t get indicted later for speaking loudly, having sleep deprivation of the suspect, or tricking him into thinking he was going to die. They don’t find the body of your child until it is discovered months later three blocks from your house tied to a tree in the woods dead.
    This is all political..Obama could stop the witch hunt..They are trying to draw attention away from their failed policies.
    Good job Lisa, keep up the good work exposing these america haters.

  12. dtroutma

    dtroutma said, 2 months ago

    Revenge for perceived attack on “daddy”, is not “vigilance”.

  13. cjkinsey

    cjkinsey said, 2 months ago

    Where was the vigilance on 9/11?

  14. tpenna

    tpennaGenius_badge said, 2 months ago

    Fact check, iamthelorax: Obama actually wanted to leave the question of torture behind us. Attorney General Holder made the decision of his own volition to appoint a special prosecutor. Bush is the one who used the Justice Department for partisan purposes, not Obama.

  15. tpenna

    tpennaGenius_badge said, 2 months ago

    bobreid, you’re right, because being nice is the only alternative to torture, right? Listen, I’ve got a friend in the Marines (doing intelligence work) with whom I disagree on absolutely everything except this. He’s more conservative than most any one of you folks on this board. And he maintains that torture is the absolute worst way to gain intelligence.

    I was actually shocked when he made a comment on my Facebook page agreeing with me on the topic.

  16. WestTex13

    WestTex13 said, 2 months ago

    Torture being the worst way to gain intelligence is a moralistic philosophical quandry..

    In the not so nice world sometimes things have to be done to achieve certain ends.. Its not pretty but I have no qualms about people using whatever means are necessary to stop bombing rampages and protect our people.. There are means of interrogation that are harsh but reasonable, the question is.. Where as a nation are we willing to draw the line and will that line still allow us to get the job done?

  17. iamthelorax

    iamthelorax said, 2 months ago

    offtopic:tpenna, how do you get things in bold? I can do italics, but can’t do bold.

    ontopic:tpenna, Obama says he doesn’t want to look backwards on camera, but that’s what politicians do, it’s called CYA. Once the cameras are off, reporters are gone, forget about it.

    I don’t doubt one bit Bush did it too, but to say Obama wouldn’t do it? Don’t bet the farm on that one.

    I mean seriously, the news was bombarded with people furious at Obama and all of a sudden this comes up? I don’t think so. It’s all politics.

  18. tpenna

    tpennaGenius_badge said, 2 months ago

    offtopic: iamthelorax, I get bold type by entering two underscores before and after the text I want formatted. By entering three underscores, you can get bold italics. Enjoy!

    ontopic: WestTex13, believe me, this buddy of mine in the Marines doesn’t let morals get in the way of his determination that torture is ineffective. This guy loves watching things (and enemies) get blown up. I once got sick listening to him go on and on about killing people.

    Besides that, are you advocating setting aside moral concerns? Surely not. I would imagine that your determination that torture is warranted is based on a moral argument, albeit a utilitarian one. I’m simply pointing out that, even on utilitarian grounds, torture is wrong because it is ineffective.

    And iamthelorax, political interference with Justice Department investigations is illegal. I am not putting it past Obama. I am just pointing out that a lot of people here are making a lot of noise without really knowing quite what they are accusing the President of doing. Because things occur concurrently does not mean there is causation. This hasn’t just sprung up all of the sudden. Holder’s been working on this for several months now.

  19. HUMPHRIES

    HUMPHRIESGenius_badge said, 2 months ago

    Howiee, crawl in to the mud with them … then what seperates us from them?

  20. av8tor

    av8torGenius_badge said, 2 months ago

    You are not answering my question..will you try and save the child by using en electric drill on the perps head or sit back and let the kid die.?

  21. tpenna

    tpennaGenius_badge said, 2 months ago

    bobreid, I did answer your question by pointing out the fact that it is a false bifurcation. Those are not the only two options.

  22. av8tor

    av8torGenius_badge said, 2 months ago

    tpenna, what are the other options? and how would they get the child from the kidnapers?

  23. WestTex13

    WestTex13 said, 2 months ago

    tpenna I am not an advocate of many forms of torture. I also do not consider some forms of harsh interogation torture. I would not condone sliding sliver of bamboo under finger nails, amputation, insertion of salt into lacerations or other forms of torture. I am hesitant to classify waterboarding as torture over interrogation. (Mental break drown without impacting boldily harm versus destruction of the tissue) As America we must lead by example. It is our duty as a global power.. Where the line should be drawn is not something I can do in a post and I would prefer indepth conversation prior to making a knee jerk reaction in regards to such a serious topic.

    I believe that the effectiveness of torture is relevant to the individual.. Somethings I can tolerate would break some people.. Things that would break me would be sluffed off by others.. If there is a proven more effective means that is expedient then it should be used but we would have to devise certain means and then classify them less enemy forces be indoctinated to effective resist such administrations. The classification itself could be harmful because sometimes what is done behind closed doors is sicking to most individuals..

    Tough topic truth be told.. I appreciate your feedback and discussion its been pleasant..

    PS thanks for the code for bolding..

  24. av8tor

    av8torGenius_badge said, 2 months ago

    WesTex Well said but still leaves the question unanswered. Remember whatever answer the perp in custody would give can be verified right away..so giving false information would not be an option for him. So what to do? what to do?

  25. DrCanuck

    DrCanuck said, 2 months ago

    bobreid, just a question: Reciprocity being the essence of the rule of law, would you also defend al Qaeda’s use of torture on a captured American airman if they thought his knowledge might save Afghanistani lives?

  26. Howard McFann

    Howard McFannGenius_badge said, 2 months ago

    These “eye for an eye” folks are probably right up front in Cnurch. We are supposed to be more civilized. Furthermore, in the shady world of the CIA, it is not above reason to suspect that many of those tortured were fingered just to further some guys career.

  27. Howard McFann

    Howard McFannGenius_badge said, 2 months ago

    These “eye for an eye” folks are probably right up front in Church. We are supposed to be more civilized. Furthermore, in the shady world of the CIA, it is not above reason to suspect that many of those tortured were fingered just to further some guy’s career.

  28. av8tor

    av8torGenius_badge said, 2 months ago

    DrCanucK defend al Qaeda’s use of torture on a captured American airman? They will torture no matter the world thinks. If I were an Al Qaeda..I would defend using torture to get the Intel. But I am not an Al Qaeda. I am of the Opinion they should all be killed in the womb as their goal is to kill all of the non-believers and that includes you and me.
    But my question still remains unanswered by this readership. So I will answer it myself. I believe I would use any means possible to save the child and that would include drilling holes in the perps head to get answers if I had to. Whose life and liberty is more important? the child or the homicidal killer?

  29. deadheadzan

    deadheadzanGenius_badge said, 2 months ago

    bobreid you are a big 24 fan- am I right? You should learn to distinguish between fiction and reality.

  30. DrCanuck

    DrCanuck said, 2 months ago

    bobreid: let’s continue. If al Qaeda “suspected” you had their child (just as you suspected some kidnapper had yours), is it also ok if they torture you?

    (al Qaeda would torture regardless of what the world thinks? Apparently, so does the USA.)

  31. av8tor

    av8torGenius_badge said, 2 months ago

    GUYS I don’t watch 24. If you define torture as actual physical harm to include drawing blood..It happens overseas and in the field but not under confinement conditions. I have only been tortured by my ex-wife. Believe me I really know the difference between fiction and reality.

  32. nomad2112

    nomad2112 said, 2 months ago

    Spot on Benson ! ! !

  33. dtroutma

    dtroutma said, 2 months ago

    It should be noted that CIA in Yemen HAD good information on 9/11 BEFORE the attack, that was ignored by “Mr Vigilant” and his staff. The information was secured by means both legal and effective.

    There are folks out there that a drill won’t get the information out of, they are fanatics. There are other techniques that might work. In the classic “excuse” for torture - Torture = dead kid.

  34. DrCanuck

    DrCanuck said, 2 months ago

    I’m not questioning your ability to distinguish fiction and reality, just between the rule of law and the rule of the tribe.

  35. cjr53

    cjr53 said, 2 months ago

    Not sure how anyone can equate the worst attack on American soil with vigilance.

    He just sat there when the attack was first reported. Almost as if he already knew, or really is slow.

  36. av8tor

    av8torGenius_badge said, 2 months ago

    when in rome do as the romans do..the rest take your kool-aid break.
    and
    when it comes to terrorists..we win, they lose..
    to borrow a line from RR.

  37. ReFlex-76

    ReFlex-76Genius_badge said, 2 months ago

    Keeping it simple:

    Torture does not work.
    Torture does not work.
    Torture does not work.

    Torture is illegal.
    Torture is illegal.
    Torture is illegal.

    Arrest the torturers.
    Arrest the torturers.
    Arrest the torturers.

    Keep coming up with all those ticking time-bomb, kidnapped child scenarios; if you’re guilty, you’ll still end up in the working end of a noose.

    In the meantime, we’ll still get the terrorists; both theirs and ours.

  38. nospam4me

    nospam4me said, 2 months ago

    Sums it up pretty well. Democrats are cuckoo!

  39. Buzzy-One

    Buzzy-One said, 2 months ago

    nospam4me … only the Democrats, my, my what a rosey world you live in.

  40. 4uk4ata

    4uk4ata said, 2 months ago

    “Sums it up pretty well. Democrats are cuckoo!”

    Or the Republicans still try to pretend it’s 9/11?

    I have to admit though, the GOP has one heck of a marketing machine. They sold the president on whose so-called “watch” 9/11 happened as the guy who was best equipped to deal with terrorism. The guy who could keep America safe. Riiight.

    Then again, Bush in 2000 ran on promises to restore honor and integrity to the White House and not to engage in nation-building, so what else is new?

  41. av8tor

    av8torGenius_badge said, 2 months ago

    Edgar the guilty dog barks first..you obviously hate america as you don’t want to take all steps to defend her.
    lay off the kool aid edgar.

  42. tpenna

    tpennaGenius_badge said, 2 months ago

    “take all steps to defend her”? bobreid, do you not realize how silly that sounds to us?

    What we’re asserting is that torture does not work. We assert this because virtually the entire intelligence community tells us this.

    In essence, what we are saying is torturing to defend America is as effective as drinking beer to defend America. There is a disconnect. One does not lead to the other.

    Yet you accuse us of being negligent because we refuse to drink beer to defend America. Perhaps you can work to convince us that torture is effective somehow.

  43. DrCanuck

    DrCanuck said, 2 months ago

    bobreid: have you always made outlandish statements without having the ability to back them up? And then resorted to insults?

  44. tpenna

    tpennaGenius_badge said, 2 months ago

    Well, okay. Ad hominem attacks. I guess that’s one way to counter a reasonable argument. Doesn’t win you much respect, bobreid, but it certainly makes all the other fourteen year old kids laugh right along with you.

  45. WestTex13

    WestTex13 said, 2 months ago

    Reflex Now the problem is this.. Define torture.. To some mere incarceration is henous.. To others it is physical harm.. To others not getting their lunch at 11:30 instead of 12 is inhumane..

    Is physical harm torture? Yes.. Is Mental Harm torture? Maybe Is Social harm torture? Perhaps.. Its difficult to define unless we have a clear line where the difference between interrogation and torture is..

    If water boarding was not classified as torture then water boarding should be effective per research, but if it is torture then it is ineffective.. because we haven’t clearly defined ineffective torture versus effective interrogation we have a problem..

    If we do define it then we set guidelines for operatives to be trained to resist.. Where is the margin out error out of the gray and into the black..

  46. ReFlex-76

    ReFlex-76Genius_badge said, 2 months ago

    We all know what torture is, weak attempts to redefine it won’t change that.

  47. WestTex13

    WestTex13 said, 2 months ago

    Then if we all know what torture is then define it please in simple terms.. What is torture and what isn’t.. and see how many people disagree with you..

  48. ReFlex-76

    ReFlex-76Genius_badge said, 2 months ago

    Kinda like porn: you know it when you see it.

    If you really want to lawyer your way out of a conviction, as the saying goes, “tell it to the judge.” If those charged really can’t explain what they did properly, the noose awaits.

  49. WestTex13

    WestTex13 said, 2 months ago

    So torture is only as you see it based on your feelings and emotion vestment in the situation at hand? That seems very loose for such an inhumane crime.. So basically.. Torture is merely opinion and there are no credentials or defining basis?