Lalo Alcaraz by Lalo Alcaraz

Lalo Alcaraz

Comments (52) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. ahab

    ahab GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    The NRA loves the gun sales.

  2. ODon

    ODon said, over 1 year ago

    @ansonia

    No but they receive major funding from gun manufacturing, hence they love gun sales.

  3. ahab

    ahab GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    @ansonia

    Bushmaster executives are on the NRA board of directors, as well as other gun, and assault/tactical weapons maker executives.

  4. Rad-ish

    Rad-ish GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    guns photo postermoreguns_zps5741cb71.jpg

  5. ahab

    ahab GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    @ansonia

    Follow the money$=NRA-Congress-Gun manufacturers!

  6. mdavis4183

    mdavis4183 GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    Alexis killed most of the people with guns he took off armed guards he killed. The Navy knew he was mentally ill. They didn’t inform the NICS. The VA knew he was mentally ill. They didn’t inform the NICS. That’s TWO government agencies who did not do their jobs. But left fringer MORONS blame the NRA. The NRA helped design the NICS. We have the Brady Bill background checks BECAUSE of the NRA.

  7. ahab

    ahab GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    @mdavis4183

    The NRA opposed the Brady Act. Wow, you are full of it!

  8. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    ^You, never mind, well, you’re just to ignorant and bigoted, but we’ll just again write it off that your I.Q. is a bit less than your “number”.


    Just for once, put aside your vile nature: you need to express an apology to all my Democratic friends on “The Wall”, and in Arlington after Iraq and Afghanistan.

  9. Anthony 2816

    Anthony 2816 GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    @Billy Sargent

    Billy, why do you keep spamming this, and then running away with your tail between your legs instead of answering replies?

    From what you write, the only conclusion possible is that you feel that we should all just accept shooting rampages and not attempt to do anything about them because:

    1) Some people abuse cigarettes, alcohol and food.

    2) Some people are killed by modes of transportation…modes that are ironically heavily regulated to prevent far more deaths…yet you feel any attempts to do the same to guns means the end of our Constitution.

    Tell me I’m wrong, and you actually have a more rational point?

    Do you also feel we should do away with driver’s licenses, road rules, car safety requirements? After all, people die from obesity, so why try to reduce car deaths?

  10. Bruce4671

    Bruce4671 said, over 1 year ago

    @Anthony 2816

    There you go again. Remember that we are sort of, kind of friends as I say this please.

    No one – including Billy please reread his comment – said anything about doing away with the current regulations on any of the items mentioned. The comparison was to the “death total” and which activity resulted in the highest number of casualties. By far, the heath related and transportation related deaths win the contest. Do you dis agree with that fact?

    Now, yes the analogy is a tad lame comparing self inflicted health issues and running a ton of steel around while putting on makeup or texting or changing the station on the boom box to a person who is mentally deranged getting a firearm and shooting others.

    However, the regulations and laws currently on the books are sufficient to insure that those of us who will read, comprehend and observe said laws and regulations do not shoot innocent people.

    So rather than berate poor Billy for having an opinion – regardless of what YOU think about it – why don’t you just think about the suggested scenario and answer the implied question?

    Do you think that an action plan with the proper training and equipment supplied – and this on a military base for Pete’s sake – would have prevented some of the deaths?

    Then think about this as well. In every one of the situations observed, health, cars, guns, what would the effect of prohibition be?

    You can look into the prohibition era for some ideas about what happens.

  11. Anthony 2816

    Anthony 2816 GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    @Bruce4671

    “Do you dis agree with that fact?”

    I disagree with his contention that the fact more people die from other things means we should ignore this problem. Should doctors refuse to treat anything but heart disease, since that’s the leading cause of death? According to Sargent’s “logic” that’s how it should be.

    “Now, yes the analogy is a tad lame”

    I’d say it’s well beyond a tad lame.

    Otherwise, you seem to be under the impression that I am for a prohibition of guns, which, being untrue, makes it difficult to respond to your post. But as far as the “proper training and equipment supplied”…that sounds like another of your rhetorical questions…like in the Tony Auth thread you abandoned 4 days ago.

  12. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    Keeping track of over 300 million people’s private lives is both unconstitutional, and “difficult”.


    There ARE more cars than guns in America, every one is registered somewhere, and if the owner hasn’t done anything illegal with it, the state has no interest in seizing it. Every new car IS registered and licensed, guns can be tracked as well. If the license number of a vehicle is obtained leaving a robbery, it can be traced, and may,or, if stolen, may not be the actual perp, but gives a place for police to start to track the bad guys.


    btw, “58”, I meant of course “liberals” who actually think regarding their world, and not just “Democrats”, who have died, or sacrificed, defending this nation. That of course doesn’t mean chickenhawks with five deferments, or going AWOL and deserting, or just otherwise planning wars that will kill other folks, and only bring them profits, and/or power.

  13. Anthony 2816

    Anthony 2816 GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    @onguard

    “The US should never have drafted and sent into combat Liberal bed wetters.”

    You honestly want military eligibility to be based on political affiliation??? How would you check for that?

    Or are you just trying to lower the average IQ of the military?

  14. ThePupUnbound!

    ThePupUnbound! said, over 1 year ago

    We now know conclusively that liberalism causes MORE, not less, gun deaths- just look at Chicago and other urban-war zones and the fact that all except for two killings with multiple gun victims in the last 50 years have occured in actual or de facto gun-free zones. Shall we ban the Democrats and their un-intended consequences?

  15. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, over 1 year ago

    Hmm, that would include the dozens of draftee “bedwetters” who received the Medal of Honor, right, onguard?

  16. Load 15 more comments. | Load the rest (37).