Lalo Alcaraz by Lalo Alcaraz

Lalo Alcaraz

Recommended

Comments (56) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. ahab

    ahab said, 6 months ago

    One Nation, Under Gun… with Bloodshed, and Death for All.

  2. Molon Labe

    Molon Labe said, 6 months ago

    Fascists, communists and other would be dictators prefer unarmed victims.

  3. masterskrain

    masterskrain said, 6 months ago

    As I asked…Has the N.R.A. stepped up advertising Gun Safety courses after Newtown?
    Have they increased the number of proper gun use training sessions nationwide?
    They say they are the world’s biggest safe gun advocates, so how about they prove it?

  4. ARodney

    ARodney said, 6 months ago

    Our point exACTly, Redneck. Twenty innocent school children shouldn’t suffer for the need of a few manhood-challenged chickenhawks to own their own mass-killing instruments. If we can outlaw shoulder-mounted surface-to-air missiles near airports, we can outlaw assault guns in society. They have one sole purpose. Rapid mass killing. We should never be surpised to see them used as designed. Ban them.

  5. D-squared

    D-squared said, 6 months ago

    @masterskrain

    Excellent point

  6. pirate227

    pirate227 said, 6 months ago

    @Molon Labe

    I don’t own an AR-15 but, I remain armed with my Glock 19.

  7. cdward

    cdward said, 6 months ago

    @Molon Labe

    As if your pitiful weapons could put a dent in an invading army.

  8. Eryx

    Eryx said, 6 months ago

    @pirate227

    Some folks have watched “Red Dawn” a few dozen times too many.

  9. midaswelby

    midaswelby said, 6 months ago

    @masterskrain

    Yes. The number of applications for Concealed Carry permits is on the increase, and the NRA teaches the required courses.
    Have they stepped up their advertising? Of course not. That would be insensitive, wouldn’t it?
    Take some of their courses, and you’ll have the proof you claim to seek.

  10. DrCanuck

    DrCanuck said, 6 months ago

    @Redneck .45

    Redneck .45 said, “What abour personal responsibility?”


    What ABOUT personal responsibility?


    We ALL here agree that Lanza was personally responsible. No argument at all. So what’s your point?

  11. Jase99

    Jase99 said, 6 months ago

    @Redneck .45

    “What abour personal responsibility??? Everyone else should not suffer because of a few!!”

    Suffer? Seriously? How does not being allowed to own high capacity semi-automatic weapons constitute suffering?

  12. Radish

    Radish said, 6 months ago

    A few people misuse drugs so they become illegal for everyone.
    Limits are suggested on some assualt rifles and large clips and the nuts scream like a three year old afraid of having all their toys away.
    One bad apple can spoil the barrel.

  13. apfelzra

    apfelzra said, 6 months ago

    @Jase99

    Exactly my viewpoint. No one suffers when such weapons are removed from society — not sportsmen, not anyone concerned about the proliferation of “weapons of mass destruction”, as these guns certainly are in a civil society. Gun sellers might suffer, but there will still be plenty of pistols and rifles to sell (restrictions on those are more problematic, and best left alone at this time, IMHO). There are many individuals, nearly all law-abiding, who enjoy firing semiautomatic assault rifles at shooting ranges, but I frankly have little sympathy for their enthusiasm. I’m sure I’d enjoy firing mortar rounds and field artillery for a while, but all these things are best left to the military.

  14. Eryx

    Eryx said, 6 months ago

    @apfelzra

    You are perhaps too sane to be posting on this thread. Or not.

  15. ahab

    ahab said, 6 months ago

    @Redneck .45

    20 dead children! Gun worshipers suck!

  16. Load 15 more comments. | Load the rest (41).