Lalo Alcaraz by Lalo Alcaraz

Lalo Alcaraz

Comments (33) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. ARodney

    ARodney said, almost 4 years ago

    Our point exACTly, Redneck. Twenty innocent school children shouldn’t suffer for the need of a few manhood-challenged chickenhawks to own their own mass-killing instruments. If we can outlaw shoulder-mounted surface-to-air missiles near airports, we can outlaw assault guns in society. They have one sole purpose. Rapid mass killing. We should never be surpised to see them used as designed. Ban them.

  2. pirate227

    pirate227 said, almost 4 years ago

    I don’t own an AR-15 but, I remain armed with my Glock 19.

  3. cdward

    cdward said, almost 4 years ago

    As if your pitiful weapons could put a dent in an invading army.

  4. midaswelby

    midaswelby said, almost 4 years ago

    Yes. The number of applications for Concealed Carry permits is on the increase, and the NRA teaches the required courses.
    Have they stepped up their advertising? Of course not. That would be insensitive, wouldn’t it?
    Take some of their courses, and you’ll have the proof you claim to seek.

  5. Jase99

    Jase99 GoComics PRO Member said, almost 4 years ago

    “What abour personal responsibility??? Everyone else should not suffer because of a few!!”

    Suffer? Seriously? How does not being allowed to own high capacity semi-automatic weapons constitute suffering?

  6. apfelzra

    apfelzra GoComics PRO Member said, almost 4 years ago


    Exactly my viewpoint. No one suffers when such weapons are removed from society — not sportsmen, not anyone concerned about the proliferation of “weapons of mass destruction”, as these guns certainly are in a civil society. Gun sellers might suffer, but there will still be plenty of pistols and rifles to sell (restrictions on those are more problematic, and best left alone at this time, IMHO). There are many individuals, nearly all law-abiding, who enjoy firing semiautomatic assault rifles at shooting ranges, but I frankly have little sympathy for their enthusiasm. I’m sure I’d enjoy firing mortar rounds and field artillery for a while, but all these things are best left to the military.

  7. Joe boyle

    Joe boyle said, almost 4 years ago


    I always wonder why these guys think their puny weapons will stop the black helicopters…and since they won’t, why bother to own them?

  8. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, almost 4 years ago

    M -60, M-79 (my personal favorite), mortars, and 105 howitzers ARE “fun” to fire on occasion, but like AR-15s with large magazines,or MAC 10’s on automatic, don’t need to be in "civilian’ hands. There is a difference between “respect” for weapons, as tools, and “reverence” for them as idols of some warped religious tenet; thus the difference between “gun owner”, and “gun nut”.

  9. cjr53

    cjr53 said, almost 4 years ago

    Ah, yes. Another fun & expensive program inherited from shrubster & cheney.

  10. kamwick

    kamwick said, almost 4 years ago

    Love how the pretenders think these weapons are going to help them "rise up against Obama’s "tyranny"", LOL.

  11. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, almost 4 years ago

    mdavis: found four sites the other day selling FULL AUTO MAC -10s, WITH suppresors! Interesting that most were “sale pending” or “sold”, even though still listed. BTW, my nephew owns one, legally.

  12. Bruce4671

    Bruce4671 said, almost 4 years ago

    Stepped up? The NRA includes a membership to the NRA and advertizement of their classes in most every box that has a gun in it for sale.

    You don’t see them on TV? Well maybe you should remember that the Media is against gun ownership and – for the most part – doesn’t accept ads from the NRA. ADs demonizing members? Oh yeah. But that is their right.

    Every person that is interested in gun ownership has crossed paths with NRA advertizing. Go online and research.

    No you lot just have an agenda and the fact that in 2010 (and it has only gone up) roughly 45% of households in the US had at lest one gun in it indicates that as mush as you don’t like it your neighbor probably has a gun. Over 4 million of those are NRA members.

    Here is an interesting article. I like the graphs. You are free to discount it as a pro-gun site and therefore lying if you wish.

  13. Bruce4671

    Bruce4671 said, almost 4 years ago


    Well, that may be farfetched BUT when the prison start letting the criminals go because the money isn’t there to keep them locked up, I’ll be happy that I have something to protect my family. Just sayin…..LOL

  14. sw10mm

    sw10mm said, almost 4 years ago

    You really need to look at Illinois and Feinstein.

  15. sw10mm

    sw10mm said, almost 4 years ago


    Senator Dianne Feinstein,

    I will not register my weapons should this bill be passed, as I do not believe it is the government’s right to know what I own. Nor do I think it prudent to tell you what I own so that it may be taken from me by a group of people who enjoy armed protection yet decry me having the same a crime. You ma’am have overstepped a line that is not your domain. I am a Marine Corps Veteran of 8 years, and I will not have some woman who proclaims the evil of an inanimate object, yet carries one, tell me I may not have one.

    I am not your subject. I am the man who keeps you free. I am not your servant. I am the person whom you serve. I am not your peasant. I am the flesh and blood of America.

    I am the man who fought for my country. I am the man who learned. I am an American. You will not tell me that I must register my semi-automatic AR-15 because of the actions of some evil man.

    I will not be disarmed to suit the fear that has been established by the media and your misinformation campaign against the American public.

    We, the people, deserve better than you.

    Respectfully Submitted,
    Joshua Boston
    Cpl, United States Marine Corps

  16. Load the rest of the comments (18).