Lalo Alcaraz by Lalo Alcaraz
- June 09, 2009
- From Beginning
- Previous feature
- Show Calendar
- Next feature
- Current
Register for a FREE GoComics account and get this plus any other comic strip delivered to your Personalized Comic Page, Daily. With a free account you will be able to build a Comic Page filled with the Comics you want to see each day.
With the largest collection of Comics and Editorial Cartoons online there is plenty to choose from. Upgrade to a Comic Genius account (Only $.99/Month) and have unlimited archive access to decades of comics.
Register for a FREE GoComics account and get this or any other comic strip daily emailed daily. Comics and Editorial Cartoons are updated everyday so there is always something new.
With a free account you will receive one comic from your Personalized Comic Page daily. Upgrade to a Comic Genius account (Only $.99/Month) and get all of your comics emailed daily plus receive unlimited archive access to decades of comics.
Lalo Alcaraz -- award-winning editorial cartoonist and Latino journalist -- captures the essence of the country’s changing cultural and political landscape. Alcaraz has produced editorial cartoons for LA Weekly since 1992 and also creates cartoons in Spanish for La Opinion, the United States’ oldest Spanish-language newspaper. His work has appeared in The New York Times, The Village Voice, Los Angeles Times, Variety, Hispanic Magazine, Latina magazine, La Jornada in Mexico City, BUNTE, (Germany’s People magazine) and many other publications. Add instant variety to your Web site’s news and opinion offerings with Alcaraz’s intelligent, youthful and thought-provoking perspective.
© 2009 Universal Press Syndicate - All Rights Reserved.
Copyright © 2009. UCLICK LLC, All rights reserved. Terms & Conditions - Privacy Policy


Comments (29) Jump to Comments Form
churchillwasright said, 5 months ago
This cartoon is stupid and a lie, and the artist shouldn’t be allowed to do it. /sarc off
I just thought I’d try typing something like some of those here do when a cartoonist on the right uses dramatic license. It didn’t really do anything for me. I wonder why they do it.
You are now free to pat each other on the back as you say how funny and accurate this is.
fennec said, 5 months ago
First off, church, when we criticize a ‘toonist, we don’t say s/he shouldn’t be allowed to do it. If I find someone being stupid or blatantly disingenuous, I’ll say so. I have that right, just as they have to say stuff I find stupid etc. Secondly, frankly, this is not one of Alcaraz’s best. In fact, it’s sort of dumb, and I’d be amazed if any of the liberals in the group really like it.
dtroutma said, 5 months ago
Having just watched replays of Rush’s comments on her, I’d be tempted, but she has too much class. If she was really the “liberal” that Rush proclaims, she’d be suing the airport authority by now.
Robert Peters
said,
5 months ago
@ churchie: I see what you’re trying to do here, but you really picked a lame panel to do it on. All artists fall short of their usual every now and then.
Ben Sargent did an awsome job of skewering one of the sacred cows of the extremist right with his cartoon of the same day. I would recommend trying again there. You might have better luck there unless you meant to pick on a lame cartoon.
Dale Hopson
said,
5 months ago
It’s a lame cartoon ( was that a pun? ).
churchillwasright said, 5 months ago
ROBERT: What can I say. I start with “A” and work my way through.
FENNEC: Sorry, but I have read posts here that said a ‘toonist had no right to say the incorrect things they were saying.
believecommonsense
said,
5 months ago
churchill, I agree with fennec, this is not one of the best toons on the subject, and it’s kind of lame, because it’s not something Sotomayor would do, nor probably any nominee to the Supreme Court.
Now if I were to meet Llimblahblah that would be another story …. just kidding, I don’t advocae physical violence.
futuredwight
said,
5 months ago
gotta say that i’m tired of the Rush is “fat” jokes. he’s lost a good amount of weight if you’ve seen recent pictures of him (http://marklevinshow.com/Article.asp?id=1361449&spid=32364) i’d almost have to say that he’s thinner than Sotomayor (http://d.yimg.com/a/p/rids/20090608/i/r4128464888.jpg?x=255&y=345&q=85&sig=JED04bVwHxP94dMOy6mWQA–;)
fennec said, 5 months ago
church, what I was responding to in your post was what I perceived as a tendency to say most or all of us liberals do this (unstated subtext being “aren’t they hypocritical”). If I’m wrong, I apologize, but was I really wrong?
Right_On said, 5 months ago
There’s Rush and the pills again. Now why don’t we ever see Barry with his crack pipe? Or was it a coke mirrior? Coke? Dat was wen he had da dough to blow, yo - chronic was cheap and gots ya a good high!!
churchillwasright said, 5 months ago
FENNEC: See Bob Gorrell 6/9: Lalas wrote:
“Gorrell shouldn’t even be allowed to print this crap.
/snark”
Now I’m not sure what the snark off means, but that’s the type of stuff I see here all the time. That’s the point of my post.
On a side note, I have noticed that the first comment on a toon often sets the tone for the comments that follow. In this regard, I would contend that without my initial comment, libs here would have been gushing about how funny this is, and about oxycontin addicted Rush, etc. Of course I can’t prove my theory now, because of my post. So I guess I ruined happy time for a bunch of posters!
senorbullwinkle
said,
5 months ago
CHURCH, Of course rush would never have felt it (the kick) his @ss is much too fat, and being soooo high, he would never have remembered, ether.
.Church, good enough ? “It’s funny, cause It’s so true”, Homer Simson.
She’s lucky she got her foot back.
Or, Watch out for his anal cyst, if you dont want any on ya !
.
Dale, Sotomayer broke her foot. I didn’t hear how she did it, only she’s on crutches. And rush has been calling her a racist
believecommonsense
said,
5 months ago
churchill, I understand the point you made, but I can tell you without a doubt that when I saw the toon, and had not yet read the comment, i thought exactly what I wrote, not really funny because sotomayor would never do it . From what I’ve seen of her since being nominated, she’s comported herself with grace and dignity
believecommonsense
said,
5 months ago
Write_off, oh really cute that comment about “barry” and his crack pipe; you think you’re clever to make up cr@p because you don’t like Obama just for being Obama?
you’ve just made yourself someone that should be soundly ignored
Right_On said, 5 months ago
bcs, I’m clearly trying to show the hypocrisy of poking at Rush for his Rx addiction when our President was disbarred for not revealing his prior drug use, which he talked about in detail in his book.
Hate me for telling the truth, but you can’t have it both ways.
fennec said, 5 months ago
Well, church, I guess I wasn’t wrong. You did mean to indicate that we liberals are hypocrites. Some of us are and some of us aren’t. That’s life. Applies to your side too, you know.
twieliczka
said,
5 months ago
The kick is up … and … it is Good!!
danielsangeo said, 5 months ago
“There’s Rush and the pills again. Now why don’t we ever see Barry with his crack pipe?”
Because Obama didn’t repeatedly attack those that did drugs and Limbaugh did?
PUPPYSAURUS
said,
5 months ago
Well, racist seems to be a relative term nowadays. She’s a “Brown-supremacist”. Shouldn’t lefties be against bigotry of all types? In the end Black and brown-supremacists only hurt themselves when they reject philosophy and cultural-paradigms that work.
Here is a candidate for the Supreme Court and the lefties are gushing all over her, here and elsewhere - even after Churchill’s pre-emptive strike:
4.Even “moderate” lefties are bizarre. Consider how her college thesis supported Peurto Rican independence.
But,
7.Libs are hypocrites.
senorbullwinkle
said,
5 months ago
..
.
.
7 HYPOCRITES ? HUH ? Do we have to guess as to which seven ?
senorbullwinkle
said,
5 months ago
CHURCH, You were right, you did control the conversation.
churchillwasright said, 5 months ago
^ The burden kept me up all night.
believecommonsense
said,
5 months ago
Write-Off said: ”I’m clearly trying to show the hypocrisy of poking at Rush for his Rx addiction when our President was disbarred for not revealing his prior drug use, which he talked about in detail in his book.”
say what? our President was disbarred? what are you talking about?
Dale Hopson
said,
5 months ago
Right_On said “There’s Rush and the pills again. Now why don’t we ever see Barry with his crack pipe?”
Maybe because DC Mayor Marion Barry and his crack pipe is old news?
danielsangeo said, 5 months ago
“She’s a “Brown-supremacist”.”
No. She isn’t.
richgrise said, 5 months ago
Apparently only white people can be racists.
When a Mexican says, “Mexicans are better than
white people”, it’s racist. But since the non-whites
are such poor unfortunate victims, they get away
with incredible racism.
The only question a Judge should have to answer is:
“Will you rule in accordance with the Constitution?”
danielsangeo said, 5 months ago
Sotomayor isn’t Mexican. And she never said that one race was better than another.
LLeRay
said,
4 months ago
Once again I see the right-wingers using slander, misrepresentation, and misdirection to try to muddy the waters because this is a fight they cannot win on the merits. Sotomayor will be confirmed; delaying that is only part of the wingnuts’ objective.
The ‘nuts want to delay the hearing because it is a great fund-raising opportunity, but the broader goal is to hold back the inexorable progress this nation is making toward justice. They’re afraid their little anthill of power is being kicked down, but they don’t realize that the new edifice will be much grander and with a better foundation. When all people are held in respect and show respect in return, it won’t matter so much about outward appearances. Sotomayor’s confirmation will advance that future another step, despite the best efforts of the troglodytes.
nomad2112 said, 4 months ago
It’s just Sotomayer’s fave dream.