
Register for a FREE GoComics account and get this plus any other comic strip delivered to your Personalized Comic Page, Daily. With a free account you will be able to build a Comic Page filled with the Comics you want to see each day.
With the largest collection of Comics and Editorial Cartoons online there is plenty to choose from. Upgrade to a GoComics Pro account (Only $.99/Month) and have unlimited archive access to decades of comics.
Customize Homepage
Daily Comics Email
Comment, share, interact with other comic fans
© Lalo Alcaraz - All Rights Reserved.
Copyright © 2013. Universal Uclick, All rights reserved. Terms & Conditions - Privacy Policy

Comments (12) (Please sign in to comment)
Trilobyte said, 4 months ago
I had a few teachers who may have made use of their firearms on me. I was taking out my anger on them with passive aggressive behaviour. Glad they didn’t have guns… An apology here to all teachers who had to deal with my stuff. Guns at school, what a concept.
Uncle Joe said, 4 months ago
Arming teachers & staff is about the dumbest idea I’ve ever heard. It’s “giving a 3 year old an X-acto knife” stupid. Leave it to the NRA to propose an armed, amateur police force in our schools.
Does the NRA think there is no liability in allowing untrained teachers to carry personal firearms? Anyone with half a lick of sense knows that we’ll see about 10,000 ‘accidents’ for every teacher who stops a mass killer.
joe waskiewicz
said, 4 months ago
Again all “gun free zones” do are to provide a easy target to the nut cases out there. I agree that the odds are extremely low for your school to be hit. The question you need to ask is, do I want to save the money that would provide a trained Policeman at the school or take that risk. Getting gun bans unfortunetly will not prevent the nut cases and criminals from haveing them, all you have to do is look at the gang violence in Chicago, which has strict gun laws.
ailurophile17 said, 4 months ago
I’ve always thought that Vero was pretty disarming anyway…
cipactli77 said, 4 months ago
@joe waskiewicz
Fort Hood is not a “gun free zone”.
Night-Gaunt49 said, 4 months ago
Many teachers are saying they would rather have the guards armed instead of themselves.
Bob
said, 4 months ago
@cipactli77
But you don’t run around Fort Hood with loaded weapons either.
DCAVALLARO said, 4 months ago
make sure everybody who is sane has a gun on them at all times. And teach a class of politness. if your stupid enough to be an a##hole in an armed society there will be fewer a##holes.
flake-67121 said, 4 months ago
getting back to it would certainly not be painless, but the loss of polite society happened BECAUSE you have fostered and encouraged fear and loathing of firearms. When people learned early and well to use guns, they became better people.
mdavis4183
said, 4 months ago
ALLOWING TEACHERS WITH CONCEALED CARRY PERMITS TO CARRY AT SCHOOL IS NOT ARMING TEACHERS.
Uncle Joe said, 4 months ago
@joe waskiewicz
The whole “gun free zone” thing is a smoke screen. Mass shooters pick targets based on a whole range of things. Emotional causes generally outweigh any rational ones.
Local gun laws like Chicago had were useless, because it was very easy to buy guns out of state where loopholes abound. Those guns were easily transported back to Chicago & sold to criminals at a nice profit.
Talking about gangs undermines the idea that concealed carry is a deterrent. Everyone knows gang-bangers often carry guns, yet that doesn’t stop them from indiscriminately opening fire on one another.
Uncle Joe said, 4 months ago
@mdavis4183
“ALLOWING TEACHERS WITH CONCEALED CARRY PERMITS TO CARRY AT SCHOOL IS NOT ARMING TEACHERS.”
Can we use our indoor voices, please?The same people who complain about incompetent, “union thug” teachers now want them to carry guns in the classroom…. what a laugh.
Who is responsible if a teacher mistakenly shoots someone she thinks is a threat? (Hint: the answer starts with “tax” & ends with “payers”).