Comments (11) (Please sign in to comment)

1. 

   Richard S. Russell said, 4 months ago

   Actually sounds like a pretty good deal.
    
   Of course, if they DID propose that, and Obama went for it, they’d immediately denounce it as a gay-agenda / Kenyan / socialist plot.
2. 

   pschearer said, 4 months ago

   They can bring our weapons back with them from Mexico.
3. 

   dbig 1oohh said, 4 months ago

   I’ll vote for it,but I bet the Moral Majority & the NRA will vote against it.
4. 

   peachyanddanny said, 4 months ago

   Well, the NRA already said terriss have the right to bear arms.
5. 

   Harleyquinn said, 4 months ago

   Why? Holder already tried that to gin up the gun debate. It only cost the life of a boarder guard. and just what is a “assault” weapon? Please? let me guess by a loony lib ideal it is the scary looking ones right?
6. 

   Night-Gaunt49 said, 4 months ago

   Since they don’t have selective fire capacity they are only called “assault weapons” due to their looks alone.
7. 

   flake-67121 said, 4 months ago

   “immigration reform”? that’s what you call the abandonment of national security?
   you people must be insane. It’s just not possible to be smart enough to work a keyboard and also stupid enough to believe in leftists.
8. 

   SkepticCal said, 4 months ago

   @Richard S. Russell

   And, why would that not be a correct conclusion?
9. 

   peachyanddanny said, 4 months ago

   Somebody figure out a way to make Louie Gohmert and Sherriff Joe self-deport. And Says Flake, how does it feel living life in constant fear of Muslims disguised as Mescans? Fracking tool.
10. 

    Night-Gaunt49 said, 4 months ago

    @flake-67121

    You mean unlike those who are fanatical and follow the antihumanist Reich wing? They aren’t crazy or stupid, they are evil.
11. 

    armindo gonzalez said, 4 months ago

    lol
12. Refresh Comments.