Comments (19) (Please sign in to comment)

1. 

   mrbribery said, 8 months ago

   Women are a special interest group, and you know the GOP will never give in to special interest groups.
2. 

   simpsonfan2 said, 8 months ago

   As long as the Christian Taliban is around, I doubt it.
3. 

   gladlythecrosseyedbear said, 8 months ago

   Only women who ride dressage are persons
4. 

   David said, 8 months ago

   Go, Cuco!
5. 

   underwriter said, 8 months ago

   @mrbribery

   Delightful! On so many levels.
6. 

   Night-Gaunt49 said, 8 months ago

   Cogent, to the point, and most of all true.
7. 

   spyderred said, 8 months ago

   Excellent and so true. The GOP is interested only in women as machines for producing more males.
8. 

   SkepticCal said, 8 months ago

   Personhood for women?
   .
   Ask Ted, The Swimmer, Kennedy. Oops, he can’t answer.
   .
   Ask John, Two Americas, Edwards. Oops, he won’t answer.
   .
   Ask Bill, The Energizer Bunny, Clinton. Oops, he just left with a campaign aide.
9. 

   TheEtruscan said, 8 months ago

   yup, pro-life and the death penalty.
10. 

    dramac333 said, 8 months ago

    @SkepticCal

    Both parties have had their fair share of men who couldn’t control their zippers. For every Democratic Edwards there’s a Republican Sanford. For every Democratic Clinton there’s a Republican Ensign. Men being controlled by their second brain is quite bipartisan. Which has zip to do with Republicans (and certainly not all of them) who want to take away a woman’s right to control her own body.
11. 

    cdward said, 8 months ago

    @spyderred

    and votes.
12. 

    cdward said, 8 months ago

    @SkepticCal

    Excuse me, but what on earth does that have to do with the topic? Are you suggesting that because three politicians (and a whole lot more on both sides, I imagine) are lecherous, this therefore makes the personhood of women an irrelevant point?
13. 

    Anonny said, 8 months ago

    maybe when democrats agree to personhood for the unborn
14. 

    SkepticCal said, 8 months ago

    @cdward

    The word “lecherous” is far too kind for accurate description of the actions toward women for the three individuals named.
    .
    However, the addition of “on both sides” is appropiate.
15. 

    ReFlex-76 said, 8 months ago

    @SkepticCal

    “Personhood for women? . Ask Ted, The Swimmer, Kennedy. Oops, he can’t answer. .”
    Ummm, because he died of brain cancer. Stay classy!
16. Load the rest of the comments (4).