John Deering by John Deering

John Deering

Comments (12) (Please sign in to comment)

  1. cjr53

    cjr53 said, about 1 year ago

    @Clark Kent

    “cheney, shrub, rumsfeld and wolfowitz belong in the international criminal court being tried for their massive war crimes.
    While we’re at it, try the thieves of wall street in federal court for their massive financial crimes that nearly destroyed the USA.”
    .
    Sorry Clark, the rich are allowed to do anything they want.

  2. Michael wme

    Michael wme said, about 1 year ago

    Silly sign. If Mr Deering would read the New York Times he’d know that most of the columnists—Slaughter, Kristof, and Cohen—say the US must send materiel, planes, drones, and naval cruise missiles to topple the Syrian regime before the US even thinks about Iraq.


    Although there is some support for droning ISIS in Iraq to get them to go back to Syria where they belong. It is evil of ISIS to overthrow the good head of state installed by the US, and good of ISIS to remove the evil head of state that all the BFFs of the US—Saudi Arabia, the UK, France, and Turkey—have insisted that the US must get rid of so they can pocket the pieces after the state is decapitated the same way they are doing in Libya.

  3. Robert Landers

    Robert Landers said, about 1 year ago

    @Michael wme

    Perhaps it might just be better if we stayed entirely away from the insanity of the Middle East. And spent more of the vast sums we spend for our military on good old fashioned police work to keep us safe from their terrorists? Or am I being too rational again?


    We could also spend some of that money on our infrastructure (if the do nothing Congress would allow it). After all the terrorists quite probably do not have to expend any effort at all on the destruction of our infrastructure, all they have to do is wait for it to fall apart on its own!!

  4. Baslim the beggar says, "The past is the enemy of the future."

    Baslim the beggar says, "The past is the enemy of the future." GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    @NeoconMan

    America’s side of course!

    Not that you’ll find a lot of agreement on what America’s side is….

  5. bueller

    bueller said, about 1 year ago

    @Michael wme

    “He” pays good money to subscribe to the Times, so i’m fairly certain " He" reads it.
    Of course, what we should be doing doesn’t
    equate with what we likely WILL do to one degree or another.
    Did we just send over 300 military advisers to Syria ?

  6. omQ R

    omQ R said, about 1 year ago

    Every Which Way… Lose.

  7. The Wolf In Your Midst

    The Wolf In Your Midst said, about 1 year ago

    @NeoconMan

    Whoever will sell us the oil for cheaper.
    .
    That is, and always has been, this country’s only concern.

  8. denis1112

    denis1112 said, about 1 year ago

    @Clark Kent

    Bbbbut Bush!!!
    The Wall Street crowd gives too much money to the Democrats to ever be prosecuted.
    They have fund raiser’s at $40,000 a plate in a very rich part of town in a nearby city 2 or 3 times a year.
    The traffic from the airport where Obama lands when he comes to pickup the money is screwed up for 20 miles.

  9. zippy06

    zippy06 said, about 1 year ago

    @Clark Kent

    The problem with pro/lib/commie/NAZI defeatocrats is they don’t want to do a good job. Or even finish a job.
    To do this right. You have to go back to Roosevelt and Winston Churchill. Winston drew the lines of the Middle East in 1921.
    And start with the commies in the State Dept., Congress, and most of the US Govt.
    Let’s say 1945 to 2014.
    Yep. How many Congressmen? how many Senators?, How many SCOTUS ?
    You forget ALL US SENATORS VOTED TO INVADED IRAQ. With UN Approval.
    Even Barry Soetoro voted for war……..

  10. Jase99

    Jase99 GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    @zippy06

    1) It’s hard to take your post seriously due to the childish name calling.
    2) The Bush Administration presented falsified evidence to support his efforts and falsely linked Iraq to the 9/11 attacks.
    3) While most Democrats allowed themselves to be suckered and/or bullied into voting to invade, many Democrats voted against the invasion. A hand full of Republicans also voted against invading and a few abstained from voting.
    4) The Bush Administration did not have UN approval for the invasion. U.N. Secretary General Kofi Annan later described the invasion of Iraq as “not in conformity with the UN charter…from the charter point of view, it was illegal.”

  11. Rad-ish

    Rad-ish GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    One of the concerns the IAMB raised repeatedly was that the CPA had repaired the well-heads and pipelines for transporting Iraq’s oil, but they had stalled on repairing the meters that were necessary to document the shipment of Iraqi oil, so it could be demonstrated that none of it was being smuggled.

    .

    The IAMB was also informed by the CPA that contrary to earlier representations the award of metering contracts have been delayed and continues to urge the expeditious resolution of this critical issue.
    .
    The CPA has acknowledged that the failure to meter the oil shipments resulted in some oil smuggling—an avoidable loss of Iraq’s oil that was Bremer’s responsibility. Neither Bremer nor any of his staff has offered an explanation for their failure to repair the meters.
    .
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Bremer
    .
    The Bush admin in 2003 did not repair the meters on Iraq oil and gas so they could steal as much as possible.

  12. dtroutma

    dtroutma GoComics PRO Member said, about 1 year ago

    All roads lead to BUSH, father and son, and their “friends”, period.

  13. Refresh Comments.