Comments (10) (Please sign in to comment)

1. 

   dtroutma said, 6 months ago

   The Republican appointments to the Intelligence committees have proven they don’t know the difference between the words “intelligence” and “psychosis”.
2. 

   Harleyquinn said, 6 months ago

   Well you see you hold something over a guys head to get him to do what you want. Then that secrete gets out and guess what. He gets to tell the world he did tell you it was a terrorist attack!
3. 

   mickey1339 said, 6 months ago

   @

   Second term presidents get very concerned about their legacy. They want to be “fondly” remembered by history…
4. 

   Harleyquinn said, 6 months ago

   But why would you care Obama? You won.
5. 

   ahab said, 6 months ago

   The Republic be damned, Republicans want to discuss sensitive issues for political gain despite National Security risks.
6. 

   Tigger said, 6 months ago

   @dtroutma

   Who failed to replace Petraeus?

   President Obama, proof he’s a Republican
7. 

   Ms. Ima said, 6 months ago

   Petraeus has nothing to lie about or cover up anymore. The real story of Benghazi will come out.
8. 

   charliekane said, 6 months ago

   @Ms. Ima

   It did.
   You lose.
9. 

   oldrellek99 said, 6 months ago

   @Ms. Ima

   Boo Hoo
10. 

    ansonia said, 6 months ago

    @ahab

    So all the Democrats in Congress knew there were security risks and none of the Republicans did? And the Democrats didn’t tell the Republicans that the reason they didn’t want to give out any information was for security? They just stood back and allowed Republicans to risk national security?
11. Refresh Comments.